Skip to main content
4 min read

Judge says Pete Hegseth is unlawfully retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly over 'illegal orders' video

Hegseth’s effort to discipline Kelly over the video was ruled unconstitutional retaliation.

Judge says Pete Hegseth is unlawfully retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly over 'illegal orders' video
Image · CNN International

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityCNN International84/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 10, 2026
tl;dr

A federal judge ruled that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth unconstitutionally retaliated against Sen. Mark Kelly over a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders. The ruling, alongside a grand jury’s refusal to approve charges against Kelly, blocks two efforts to punish him over the video.

Community verdict

12 VOTES
How does this story look for
Pete Hegseth R · Secretary of Defense

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 27

● OPEN
  • Readers of left-leaning coverage: 50% good look
  • Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Pete Hegseth
R · Secretary of Defense

Defense secretary who pursued administrative action against Kelly

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Mark Kelly
D · AZ · SEN

Arizona senator whose challenge to Hegseth’s disciplinary action was upheld by the judge

Kelly's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President whose administration was involved in the dispute and who criticized Kelly

ALSO MENTIONED  Richard Leon, Senior U.S. district judge who ruled in Kelly’s favor; George W. Bush, Former president who appointed Judge Leon; James Comey, Former FBI director mentioned in comparison with other cases; Letitia James, New York attorney general mentioned in comparison with other cases

Part of a bigger story

21 OUTLETS
Judge Blocks Pentagon Action Against Sen. Mark Kelly

A federal judge blocked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s effort to punish Sen. Mark Kelly. Left-leaning outlets frame the ruling as protecting Kelly’s First Amendment rights from retaliation; one also reports Hegseth’s planned appeal and his characterization of Kelly’s conduct as sedition.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…