GOP Sen. Steve Daines' last-minute withdrawal from Senate race was meant to block Democrats from fielding a top-tier recruit
Daines withdrew from the race just before the filing deadline in a move sources said was intended to limit Democrats’ options.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates CNN, which carries this article. The other scores rate the article itself. CNN's published outlet score.
Credibility rates CNN, which carries this article. The other scores rate the article itself. CNN's published outlet score.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story reports specific timing and attributes its account of Daines's motive to two sources familiar with the matter. It includes criticism from Democrats and a rival candidate, but the sources are anonymous and Daines's office had not commented.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story presents the reported rationale and includes criticism from Democrats and Bodnar, as well as Trump's praise and endorsement of Alme. However, Daines's office did not comment, and the account of his motive rests on anonymous sources.
- Source diversity — The story includes anonymous sources, political critics, a rival candidate, and Trump's public post, but no direct comment from Daines.
- Counterarguments presented — Democrats and Bodnar criticize the move, while Trump's endorsement offers a favorable response to the succession.
- Omitted context — Daines's office was contacted, but the article contains no response from him or his office.
- Loaded language — Some charged terms appear in attributed criticism rather than as the reporter's own judgment.
The article reports the alleged strategy with attribution, includes criticism from Democrats and a rival, and notes Trump's endorsement of Alme. Its wording is largely straightforward rather than overtly partisan.
- Language tone — Mostly neutral reporting language, with critical descriptions attributed to sources or political opponents.
- Source selection — The story uses anonymous sources, Democratic criticism, a rival candidate's statement, and Trump's endorsement.
- Framing — It centers the reported effort to limit Democratic recruitment while also describing the filing timeline and competing reactions.
Republished by AOL.com
Steve Daines withdrew from Montana’s Senate race minutes before the filing deadline, reportedly to prevent Democrats from recruiting a strong challenger. Kurt Alme filed to run shortly before the deadline, leaving no time for a top-tier Democrat to enter.
Two sources familiar with the matter said Daines timed his withdrawal to block Democrats from recruiting a strong candidate, including former Sen. Jon Tester or former Govs. Brian Schweitzer and Steve Bullock. Daines withdrew minutes before the filing deadline, and Alme filed to run eight minutes before it closed, according to the article. The sources said Daines had planned to seek a third term if Alme did not run.
Community verdict
22 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 44
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Senate candidate who filed shortly before the Montana deadline
Alme's version of this story ↗President who praised Daines and endorsed Alme
Former Montana governor named as a potential Democratic recruit
Former senator named as a potential Democratic recruit
Illinois representative cited as having made a similar move the prior year
Independent Senate candidate who criticized Daines's withdrawal
Part of a bigger story
23 OUTLETSDaines withdrew from his reelection bid shortly before Montana’s filing deadline. Kurt Alme entered the race around the deadline, and Daines endorsed him as his preferred successor. Left-leaning outlets focus on whether Daines’s timing and endorsement narrowed the primary or kept potential recruits out. Center outlets mainly recount the exit, Alme’s entry and endorsements, while also reporting claims about the effect on competition. Right-leaning outlets generally pair Daines’s departure with his support for Alme, though their coverage also includes criticism of the timing.
- ARTICLES
- 44
- OUTLETS
- 23
- AVG CRED
- 71
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






