Vote to Censure Democrat Stacey Plaskett over Epstein Relationship Fails
The House rejected a censure measure targeting Plaskett over her communications with Jeffrey Epstein.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYBreitbart is an established but strongly partisan outlet, and this page is categorized as opinion. The article identifies its author and includes opposing lawmakers’ statements, but offers limited independent sourcing beyond the document description and attributed claims.
- Source type — Opinion-category material from a strongly partisan outlet.
- Source diversity — Quotes lawmakers on opposing sides, but relies mainly on their claims.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
- Transparency — The article identifies the documents and committee release it discusses, with limited detail on independent verification.
The article provides the vote tally and quotes lawmakers on opposing sides, but does not include Plaskett's response or independent analysis of the documents and the allegations. Its description of the communications is brief and partly evaluative.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents the censure sponsor's case and a substantial response from a Democratic opponent, and reports the vote tally. It does not include Plaskett's own response or further independent context about the communications.
- Counterarguments presented — Raskin directly disputes the ethical basis and motivation for the censure.
- Source diversity — Two lawmakers on opposing sides are quoted; Plaskett is not quoted.
- Loaded language — The article calls the communications “shocking” and describes the replies as friendly.
- Omitted context — It offers little independent examination of the messages or the allegations.
The account frames the communications negatively, using descriptions such as “shocking” and emphasizing Plaskett’s “friendly replies,” while also including Raskin’s rebuttal. The overall selection and framing lean right.
- Language tone — Uses charged descriptions of the documents and emphasizes the alleged cordial relationship.
- Framing — Centers the censure and the allegations against Plaskett.
- Source selection — Includes arguments from both the censure's sponsor and its Democratic opponent.
The House vote to censure Delegate Stacey Plaskett over her communications with Jeffrey Epstein failed, 209-214. Supporters said the messages raised concerns about her conduct during a hearing; Democrats argued the censure was unjustified.
The article reports that the House vote to censure Plaskett failed 209-214, with three Republicans voting against it and three voting present. The proposed censure also sought to remove her from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. The article says released documents showed Epstein texting Plaskett during her questioning of Michael Cohen, and characterizes their replies as friendly.
Rep. Ralph Norman, who introduced the censure, said the documents showed Plaskett coordinated her questioning with a convicted sex offender. Rep. Jamie Raskin countered that the measure was a distraction and argued that Plaskett had taken a call from a constituent without evidence of an ethical or legal transgression.
Community verdict
10 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 32
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 25% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Republican representative who introduced the censure
Democratic representative who opposed the censure
Part of a bigger story
23 OUTLETSOutlets on multiple sides report that released messages showed Plaskett exchanging texts with Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing. They also report that the House rejected a resolution to censure her over the exchanges. Left-leaning outlets frame the story around Plaskett's floor clash with Republicans and emphasize supportive reactions. Center outlets largely pair the failed censure effort with Plaskett's explanation, while some also report Republicans' claims of a related deal. Right-leaning outlets more often cast the texts as troubling conduct and stress the failed censure effort, with some also amplifying claims of a deal.
- ARTICLES
- 32
- OUTLETS
- 23
- AVG CRED
- 53
- Washington Examiner · Epstein files will 'boomerang' on Democrats, not Trump: Joe Concha
- Atlanta Black Star · 'It's Lowkey Insane': Congressional Hearing Erupts Into Chaos After Democrat Hits Trump With The F-Word, Triggering The Most Dramatic GOP Outrage Yet
- Blaze Media · Epstein files backfire as Democrats get pulled into their own trap
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


