Abdul El-Sayed has a conversation to finish with Michigan Jews | Opinion - Belleville News-Democrat
Rabbi Josh Whinston says El-Sayed should explain remarks about Israel that he believes risk alienating Jewish Michiganders.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Bnd, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The page appears in an established regional newspaper, and the underlying opinion piece identifies its author and original publication. The contributor’s opinion status is clear, though this is not independent news reporting.
- Track record — Belleville News-Democrat is an established regional newspaper.
- Editorial standards — The page identifies the piece as opinion rather than presenting it as straight reporting.
- Transparency — The page names the original publication and identifies the contributor.
- Author attribution — Josh Whinston is named and identified as an op-ed contributor and senior rabbi.
The essay identifies its author and supports its argument with attributed polling and figures from named organizations. It is an explicitly personal argument rather than a report with competing viewpoints; it includes El-Sayed’s apology and some shared policy ground but does not present a fuller response from him.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is an opinion essay advancing Whinston’s case that El-Sayed’s language harms Jewish trust and safety. It acknowledges El-Sayed’s apology and shared ground, but does not provide a fuller account of El-Sayed’s response or an opposing perspective.
- Counterarguments presented — The essay notes El-Sayed’s apology and says criticism of Israel is not inherently antisemitic, but offers no fuller counterargument.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is explicitly an op-ed and argues for a particular conclusion.
- Loaded language — The author uses evaluative terms such as “beyond the pale” and “terrifying.”
- Source diversity — The argument is primarily the author’s perspective, with limited attributed polling and incident data.
The essay is rooted in the author’s self-described Democratic and liberal commitments and supports several progressive causes, while criticizing a Democratic candidate and also condemning rhetoric from a Republican campaign. Its framing is mildly left-of-center rather than strongly partisan.
- Framing — The author grounds the argument in liberal and Democratic values while insisting on standards for both parties.
- Language tone — The author uses moral language to criticize El-Sayed’s rhetoric but also criticizes Republican campaign rhetoric.
- Source selection — The piece is a first-person argument by one author, not a multi-source news report.
Republished with credit
Republished from Reuters, with credit to the original publisher.
Not rated.
Rabbi Josh Whinston argues that Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed should explain remarks about Israel that Whinston says risk alienating and endangering Jewish communities. He also notes shared policy ground with El-Sayed and says he hopes respectful dialogue can follow.
Whinston, a rabbi in Ann Arbor, says El-Sayed’s description of Israel as “bloodthirsty” echoed an antisemitic trope. He also criticizes El-Sayed’s comments after an attack on a synagogue, while acknowledging that El-Sayed later apologized for the timing and said he had not intended to justify the attack or discount Jewish pain. Whinston argues that political leaders’ language can affect how Jewish constituents are treated and whether antisemitism is condemned.
Whinston says criticism of Israel is not inherently antisemitic and describes shared ground with El-Sayed, including support for health care, economic opportunity and democracy. He says he helped launch a public petition asking political leaders to commit to protecting Jewish safety, identity and political participation, and calls for dialogue rather than agreement on every issue.
Community verdict
6 VOTES
Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 6
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 60% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Michigan Senate candidate criticized for his rhetoric about Israel and Jewish safety
Michigan senator whose leadership the author praises
Republican Michigan Senate candidate whose campaign rhetoric the author condemns
Democratic presidential candidate in 2024, mentioned in a statistic about Jewish voters
Part of a bigger story
6 OUTLETSCoverage centers on a Michigan Senate debate in which Abdul El-Sayed said Israel and Iran had both proved dangerous, without naming one as the greater threat to the U.S. Center outlets present the exchange as part of a broader dispute with Mike Rogers over Israel, Iran, military aid and diplomacy, alongside separate reporting on El-Sayed's campaign outreach. Right-leaning outlets emphasize his response to the threat question and portray it critically, including as a failure to answer directly.
- ARTICLES
- 6
- OUTLETS
- 6
- AVG CRED
- 62
- Jewish Telegraphic Agency · Is Israel or Iran a bigger threat to the US? Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed won’t say - Jewish Telegraphic Agency
- The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com · El-Sayed says Israel, Iran have both proven 'dangerous' to US in Michigan Senate debate - The Jerusalem Post
- Breitbart · Michigan U.S. Senate Debate: Abdul El-Sayed Says Israel, Iran ‘Have Proven Dangerous in Their Own Way’
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…