Skip to main content
4 min read
◆ Mixed look for CruzForeign PolicyDefense / Military

A decade after mocking Trump, Ted Cruz now backs taking Greenland

Cruz now supports seeking U.S. control of Greenland, while advocating diplomacy and negotiations with Denmark.

A decade after mocking Trump, Ted Cruz now backs taking Greenland
Image · Austin American-Statesman

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityAustin American-Statesman77/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 11, 2026
tl;dr

Ted Cruz, who once warned that Donald Trump might “nuke” Denmark, now supports seeking U.S. control of Greenland through diplomacy. Trump has renewed his push for the island and said the United States could take it “the hard way.”

Community verdict

23 VOTES
How does this story look for
Ted Cruz R · TX · SEN

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 26

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Ted Cruz
R · TX · SEN

Senator supporting efforts to bring Greenland under U.S. control

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President pressing for U.S. control of Greenland

Trump's version of this story ↗
ALSO MENTIONED  Frederik X, King of Denmark; George H.W. Bush, Former U.S. president cited as historical context; George W. Bush, Former U.S. president cited as historical context; Margrethe II, Former queen of Denmark; Osama bin Laden, Former al-Qaeda leader cited in historical context; Peter Boysen, Leader of the Danish army; Saddam Hussein, Former Iraqi leader cited in historical comparisons

Part of a bigger story

6 OUTLETS
Ted Cruz Says U.S. Should Acquire Greenland

Ted Cruz backed President Donald Trump's effort to acquire Greenland, citing U.S. economic and national-security interests. Left-leaning outlets portray his backing as uncritical support for Trump and condemn the proposal. Center outlets focus on Cruz's stated economic and security case, while also reporting objections and, in one article, his earlier criticism of Trump.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…