Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for MassieCriminal Justice

Republican says Trump DOJ's Epstein files dump 'grossly fails to comply' with his law

Massie said the Justice Department’s release failed to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Republican says Trump DOJ's Epstein files dump 'grossly fails to comply' with his law
Image · Alternet.org

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityAlternet.org45/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 12, 2026
Dec 19, 2025
tl;dr

Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna said the Justice Department’s heavily redacted release of Epstein investigation files failed to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Khanna said he and Massie were considering options including contempt proceedings or referrals for prosecution.

Community verdict

18 VOTES
How does this story look for
Thomas Massie R · KY-4

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 4

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Thomas Massie
R · KY-4

Representative criticizing the Justice Department’s release of Epstein files

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Ro Khanna
D · CA-17

Representative criticizing redactions in the Justice Department’s release

Khanna's version of this story ↗

Attorney General responsible for redaction decisions and named in criticism of the release

Todd Blanche
R · Attorney General

Deputy Attorney General tagged by Massie in criticism of the document release

Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who signed the law and whose administration is accused of violating it

Part of a bigger story

4 OUTLETS
Massie Challenges DOJ Compliance With Epstein Files Disclosure Law

Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna said the Justice Department’s redacted Epstein-files release did not comply with the disclosure law and discussed congressional action. Left-leaning outlets frame the release as a failure to comply with the law. Center outlets likewise report the compliance objection and possible congressional action, adding details including the Justice Department’s compliance claim and a restored photo.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…