https://www.wsaw.com
A local outlet rated high on credibility, with a lean close to the center. None of the stories it hosts is a confirmed repost.A local outlet rated high on credibility, with a lean close to center. None of its stories here are confirmed reposts.
- CREDIBILITY
- 73High
- LEAN
- 50Center
- ORIGINALITY
- 100%
- STORIES
- 11none this week
- REPRINTED
- 0times
Credibility 10 stories · 95% range 71–76 · updated Oct 10, 2026Lean 10 stories · 95% range 46–54 · updated Oct 10, 2026Originality 11 hosted stories · updated Oct 10, 2026
https://www.wsaw.com at a glance
SCORECARD
Ticks mark the local news average; on the lean bar, its own lean.STORIES · 12 MONTHS
11Busiest month: March, 5 stories, 4 of them on Elections/Campaigns and 1 on Foreign Policy.
Hatched: Nov–Jan, when ChamberLight collected few or no stories from any outlet, so a gap there is not the outlet’s.
LATEST ACTIVITY
- BLINDSPOTSkipped: Thomas Massie Files Impeachment Articles Against Pete Hegseth 77 outlets covered it
https://www.wsaw.com’s scores: credibility, lean and originality
CREDIBILITY
The combined AI rating of its own stories, 0 to 100, for the outlet’s transparency, standards, corrections and original reporting. The same as the local news average (73).
POLITICAL LEAN
Where its news stories sit from 0 (left) to 100 (right). Opinion pieces are left out, and its stories reposted on other sites count toward it.
ORIGINALITY
The share of stories it hosts that are not confirmed copies of another outlet’s article. A copy counts here once its original publisher is known.
SCORE HISTORY · 12 MONTHSHISTORY · 12 MO
Dotted where ChamberLight collected few or no stories (Nov–Jan). The dashed line is the local news average (73). How score history works
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
What https://www.wsaw.com covers: topics and people
TOP TOPICS · SHARE OF ITS STORIESTOP TOPICS
TICK = ALL OUTLETSTICK = ALL- Elections/Campaigns46%+5 PTS against 40% of all outlets’ stories
- Healthcare9%+6 PTS against 3% of all outlets’ stories
- Housing9%+9 PTS against 1% of all outlets’ stories
- Social Security/Medicare9%+9 PTS against 0% of all outlets’ stories
- Technology/Privacy9%+6 PTS against 3% of all outlets’ stories
WHO THEY COVER · 10 STORY–PERSON PAIRS · 10 PAIRS
- 1Fred Clark (Democrat)3 stories
- 2Tammy Baldwin (Democrat)3 stories
- 3Michael Alfonso (Republican)2 stories
- 4Derrick Van Orden (Republican)1 stories
- 5Rebecca Cooke (Democrat)1 stories
How https://www.wsaw.com framed shared stories, and what it skipped
WHAT IT SKIPPED · BLINDSPOTS
Stories that 8 or more news outlets covered in the last 30 days and https://www.wsaw.com did not.
https://www.wsaw.com’s owner, reprints and similar outlets
OWNERSHIP
WHO REPRINTS IT
MOST SIMILAR OUTLETS
- Cbs2iowaCredibility 73Lean 50
- News8000.comCredibility 73Lean 50
- KtivCredibility 73Lean 50
- tahoedailytribune.comCredibility 73Lean 50
- Hindustan TimesCredibility 73Lean 50
- KVIACredibility 73Lean 50
Compare https://www.wsaw.com with other outlets
Best value in each row is highlighted. Tone is the share of stories positive toward a party minus the share negative, from −100 to +100. No story in the last 90 days was covered by all four.
- https://www.wsaw.comTHIS SOURCE
- Cbs2iowa
- News8000.com
- Ktiv
CREDIBILITY
LEAN (50 = CENTER)
ORIGINALITY
STORIES
ELECTIONS/CAMPAIGNS COVERAGE
TONE TOWARD GOP
TONE TOWARD DEMS
Best value in each row is highlighted. Tone is the share of stories positive toward a party minus the share negative, from −100 to +100. No story in the last 90 days was covered by all four.










