Skip to main content

Search

Search people, articles, bills, and more

News-Talk 1480 WHBC logo

News-Talk 1480 WHBC

whbc.com

Local NewsProvenance not yet reviewed

2 stories credited to News-Talk 1480 WHBC

Latest story Apr 15, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026

A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.

Scores for News-Talk 1480 WHBC

Credibility

Not enough stories yet: 2 of 10.

How this is measured

Political lean

Not enough stories yet: 2 of 10.

How this is measured

Originality

Not enough stories yet: 2 of 10.

How this is measured

Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 2 of 10. How it is measured

Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Stories credited to News-Talk 1480 WHBC, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

  • Stories from News-Talk 1480 WHBC
  • Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
MonthStoriesAll outlets
April 202622,921
May 20260none collected
June 20260none collected
July 20260none collected
August 202601 (collection gap)
September 202601,320

Top topics

Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

  • Ethics/Corruption2

    100% of 2 stories · 58% across all outlets

  • Criminal Justice1

    50% of 2 stories · 19% across all outlets

  • Defense/Military1

    50% of 2 stories · 25% across all outlets

  • Foreign Policy1

    50% of 2 stories · 29% across all outlets

The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 6 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 6 story–official pairs, from 2 stories.

  • Democrat67% · 4 pairs
  • Republican33% · 2 pairs

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not News-Talk 1480 WHBC’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 2 stories.

Good Look
1 (50%)
Mixed
1 (50%)
Informational
0 (0%)
Bad Look
0 (0%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from whbc.com

6

Senate Republicans Again Reject Effort To Halt Iran Conflict

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-led Senate on Wednesday rejected the latest Democratic attempt to halt President Donald Trump’s conflict in Iran, turning aside a resolution that would require the U.S. to withdraw forces from the conflict until Congress authorizes further action. The 47-52 vote was the fourth time this year that the Senate has voted to cede its war powers to the president in a conflict that Democrats say is illegal and unjustified. Republicans say they will keep faith in Trump’s wartime leadership, for now, citing Iran’s nuclear capabilities and the high stakes of withdrawal. But GOP lawmakers are also anxious for the conflict to end — and they may not defer to the executive branch indefinitely. Some Republicans have already made clear that they are eyeing future votes that could become an important test for the president if the conflict drags on. Under the War Powers Act of 1973, Congress must declare war or authorize use of force within 60 days of its start — a deadline that will arrive at the end of this month. The law provides for a potential 30-day extension of that deadline, but lawmakers have made clear that they want the administration to soon lay out a plan for the end of the conflict. After the 60-day or 90-day deadline, “it’s time to fish or cut bait,” said Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina. “I think that the administration would be wise to put together what would look like a well-founded authorization of military force and a funding strategy,” Tillis said. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has been talking to colleagues about putting together a resolution that would authorize the war beyond that time period. Republican Sens. John Curtis of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine have also said they would like to see congressional action.

Apr 15, 20267 votes

Senate Republicans Again Reject Effort To Halt Iran Conflict

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-led Senate on Wednesday rejected the latest Democratic attempt to halt President Donald Trump’s conflict in Iran, turning aside a resolution that would require the U.S. to withdraw forces from the conflict until Congress authorizes further action. The 47-52 vote was the fourth time this year that the Senate has voted to cede its war powers to the president in a conflict that Democrats say is illegal and unjustified. Republicans say they will keep faith in Trump’s wartime leadership, for now, citing Iran’s nuclear capabilities and the high stakes of withdrawal. But GOP lawmakers are also anxious for the conflict to end — and they may not defer to the executive branch indefinitely. Some Republicans have already made clear that they are eyeing future votes that could become an important test for the president if the conflict drags on. Under the War Powers Act of 1973, Congress must declare war or authorize use of force within 60 days of its start — a deadline that will arrive at the end of this month. The law provides for a potential 30-day extension of that deadline, but lawmakers have made clear that they want the administration to soon lay out a plan for the end of the conflict. After the 60-day or 90-day deadline, “it’s time to fish or cut bait,” said Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina. “I think that the administration would be wise to put together what would look like a well-founded authorization of military force and a funding strategy,” Tillis said. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has been talking to colleagues about putting together a resolution that would authorize the war beyond that time period. Republican Sens. John Curtis of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine have also said they would like to see congressional action.

Apr 15, 202620 votes

Oregon Congresswomen Call For Swalwell To Go

UNDATED – Three members of Oregon’s congressional delegation are calling for California Congressman Eric Swalwell to resign following recent allegations of sexual assault made by multiple women. The lawmakers are responding to reports that have resulted in no legal actions but have sparked renewed scrutiny and political pressure in Washington, D.C. Salinas: Allegations are “serious” and require accountability Andrea Salinas said the allegations against Swalwell are “serious” and should be addressed through immediate accountability measures. In a statement, Salinas emphasized that while due process is important, members of Congress are held to a high ethical standard and must be prepared to face consequences when serious accusations arise. Hoyle calls for expedited review Val Hoyle weighed in on social media, saying she plans to request an expedited review of the allegations. Hoyle did not elaborate on the specifics of what such a review would entail, but her comments add to growing pressure for House leadership and ethics officials to act quickly. Dexter: “Must resign immediately” Maxine Dexter took the strongest position among the Oregon delegation, calling for Swalwell’s immediate resignation from Congress. Dexter also said she would vote to expel him if he does not step down voluntarily, signaling support for the most severe congressional disciplinary action available. Members of Congress can be disciplined in several ways, including censure, removal from committee assignments, or expulsion. Expulsion requires a two-thirds majority vote in the House of Representatives, making it a rare and significant action. Any formal action would typically follow a review by the House Ethics Committee or other investigative bodies, depending on how leadership chooses to proceed. The allegations against Swalwell have not been resolved in court, and no formal findings of wrongdoing have been announced by congressional investigators. Swalwell has not been criminally charged in connection with the claims referenced by lawmakers in their statements.

Apr 14, 20266 votes

Oregon Congresswomen Call For Swalwell To Go

UNDATED – Three members of Oregon’s congressional delegation are calling for California Congressman Eric Swalwell to resign following recent allegations of sexual assault made by multiple women. The lawmakers are responding to reports that have resulted in no legal actions but have sparked renewed scrutiny and political pressure in Washington, D.C. Salinas: Allegations are “serious” and require accountability Andrea Salinas said the allegations against Swalwell are “serious” and should be addressed through immediate accountability measures. In a statement, Salinas emphasized that while due process is important, members of Congress are held to a high ethical standard and must be prepared to face consequences when serious accusations arise. Hoyle calls for expedited review Val Hoyle weighed in on social media, saying she plans to request an expedited review of the allegations. Hoyle did not elaborate on the specifics of what such a review would entail, but her comments add to growing pressure for House leadership and ethics officials to act quickly. Dexter: “Must resign immediately” Maxine Dexter took the strongest position among the Oregon delegation, calling for Swalwell’s immediate resignation from Congress. Dexter also said she would vote to expel him if he does not step down voluntarily, signaling support for the most severe congressional disciplinary action available. Members of Congress can be disciplined in several ways, including censure, removal from committee assignments, or expulsion. Expulsion requires a two-thirds majority vote in the House of Representatives, making it a rare and significant action. Any formal action would typically follow a review by the House Ethics Committee or other investigative bodies, depending on how leadership chooses to proceed. The allegations against Swalwell have not been resolved in court, and no formal findings of wrongdoing have been announced by congressional investigators. Swalwell has not been criminally charged in connection with the claims referenced by lawmakers in their statements.

Apr 14, 20266 votes

Oregon Congresswomen Call For Swalwell To Go

UNDATED – Three members of Oregon’s congressional delegation are calling for California Congressman Eric Swalwell to resign following recent allegations of sexual assault made by multiple women. The lawmakers are responding to reports that have resulted in no legal actions but have sparked renewed scrutiny and political pressure in Washington, D.C. Salinas: Allegations are “serious” and require accountability Andrea Salinas said the allegations against Swalwell are “serious” and should be addressed through immediate accountability measures. In a statement, Salinas emphasized that while due process is important, members of Congress are held to a high ethical standard and must be prepared to face consequences when serious accusations arise. Hoyle calls for expedited review Val Hoyle weighed in on social media, saying she plans to request an expedited review of the allegations. Hoyle did not elaborate on the specifics of what such a review would entail, but her comments add to growing pressure for House leadership and ethics officials to act quickly. Dexter: “Must resign immediately” Maxine Dexter took the strongest position among the Oregon delegation, calling for Swalwell’s immediate resignation from Congress. Dexter also said she would vote to expel him if he does not step down voluntarily, signaling support for the most severe congressional disciplinary action available. Members of Congress can be disciplined in several ways, including censure, removal from committee assignments, or expulsion. Expulsion requires a two-thirds majority vote in the House of Representatives, making it a rare and significant action. Any formal action would typically follow a review by the House Ethics Committee or other investigative bodies, depending on how leadership chooses to proceed. The allegations against Swalwell have not been resolved in court, and no formal findings of wrongdoing have been announced by congressional investigators. Swalwell has not been criminally charged in connection with the claims referenced by lawmakers in their statements.

Apr 14, 20266 votes

Oregon Congresswomen Call For Swalwell To Go

UNDATED – Three members of Oregon’s congressional delegation are calling for California Congressman Eric Swalwell to resign following recent allegations of sexual assault made by multiple women. The lawmakers are responding to reports that have resulted in no legal actions but have sparked renewed scrutiny and political pressure in Washington, D.C. Salinas: Allegations are “serious” and require accountability Andrea Salinas said the allegations against Swalwell are “serious” and should be addressed through immediate accountability measures. In a statement, Salinas emphasized that while due process is important, members of Congress are held to a high ethical standard and must be prepared to face consequences when serious accusations arise. Hoyle calls for expedited review Val Hoyle weighed in on social media, saying she plans to request an expedited review of the allegations. Hoyle did not elaborate on the specifics of what such a review would entail, but her comments add to growing pressure for House leadership and ethics officials to act quickly. Dexter: “Must resign immediately” Maxine Dexter took the strongest position among the Oregon delegation, calling for Swalwell’s immediate resignation from Congress. Dexter also said she would vote to expel him if he does not step down voluntarily, signaling support for the most severe congressional disciplinary action available. Members of Congress can be disciplined in several ways, including censure, removal from committee assignments, or expulsion. Expulsion requires a two-thirds majority vote in the House of Representatives, making it a rare and significant action. Any formal action would typically follow a review by the House Ethics Committee or other investigative bodies, depending on how leadership chooses to proceed. The allegations against Swalwell have not been resolved in court, and no formal findings of wrongdoing have been announced by congressional investigators. Swalwell has not been criminally charged in connection with the claims referenced by lawmakers in their statements.

Apr 14, 202620 votes