4 stories credited to Patriot Journal
Latest story Apr 13, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for Patriot Journal
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 2 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to Patriot Journal, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from Patriot Journal
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| March 2026 | 1 | 296 |
| April 2026 | 3 | 4,538 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 1,320 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Ethics/Corruption3
75% of 4 stories · 58% across all outlets
- Defense/Military2
50% of 4 stories · 25% across all outlets
- Foreign Policy2
50% of 4 stories · 29% across all outlets
- Budget/Spending1
25% of 4 stories · 31% across all outlets
- Criminal Justice1
25% of 4 stories · 19% across all outlets
- Immigration1
25% of 4 stories · 13% across all outlets
- Infrastructure1
25% of 4 stories · 8% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 5 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 6 story–official pairs, from 4 stories.
- Democrat67% · 4 pairs
- Republican33% · 2 pairs
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 4 stories.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not Patriot Journal’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 4 stories.
- Good Look
- 0 (0%)
- Mixed
- 2 (50%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 2 (50%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from thepatriotjournal.com
6
Eric Swalwell Suspends California Gubernatorial Campaign Amid Sexual Misconduct Allegations
In Washington D.C., you learn pretty quickly that character isn’t just an optional accessory; it’s supposed to be the entire foundation. The trust we give our elected officials is a sacred pact, built on the simple idea that they have a moral compass that points somewhere other than their own ambition. It’s a standard that requires integrity, personal responsibility, and a basic respect for the very laws they create. When that foundation cracks, the whole rotten structure of modern politics starts to look even shakier. For years, we’ve had to listen to lectures from the Left about their monopoly on moral virtue, especially when it came to the #MeToo movement. They turned it into a high-tech political weapon, demanding scalps and scorched-earth justice. But funny enough, when the man in the spotlight is one of their own, the outrage machine sputters and stalls. Now, with a top-tier Democrat’s career going up in flames, that hypocrisy is burning bright enough for everyone to see. The politician at the center of this dumpster fire, California Rep. Eric Swalwell, recently tried to douse the flames by stepping back from his race for governor. From ‘The Post Millennial’: In a post on X Sunday night, he said “I am suspending my campaign for Governor. To my family, staff,friends, and supporters, I am deeply sorry for mistakes in judgment I’ve made in my past. I will fight the serious, false allegations that have been made — but that’s my fight, not a campaign’s.” You almost have to admire the nerve. That statement is a masterwork of political deflection, a calculated retreat masquerading as accountability. “Suspending” a campaign is a temporary fix for a permanent character problem, and Swalwell has made it crystal clear he has no intention of giving up his cozy seat in Congress. This isn’t a man taking responsibility; it’s a politician clinging to power while hoping everyone gets distracted by the next shiny object. A Suspension Is Not Accountability There’s a good reason Swalwell’s political support vanished faster than a balanced budget. According to Axios, all 21 of his House and Senate Democratic colleagues yanked their endorsements. They know he’s radioactive. Yet, Swalwell seems to believe he can ride this out from his D.C. office, cashing a taxpayer-funded paycheck while fighting accusations that make him fundamentally unfit for any public role. Running for governor is a choice. Serving in the United States Congress is a public trust. By refusing to resign, Swalwell is broadcasting to his constituents and the entire nation that his power is more important than the integrity of the institution he supposedly serves. A Disturbing Pattern of Conduct Let’s be clear: the allegations against Swalwell aren’t some minor political stumble. They are stomach-turning. Reports from CNN and the San Francisco Chronicle detail an accusation of sexual assault from a former staffer, who told reporters, “I was pushing him off of me, saying no… He didn’t stop.” More than 50 of his own former staffers signed a letter calling the allegations “serious” and “credible,” and flatly stated, “We believe her.” As if that weren’t damning enough, this scandal comes with a side of federal investigation. The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly looking into Swalwell for hiring a Brazilian nanny without proper work authorization. This isn’t just sloppy paperwork; it’s the kind of breathtaking arrogance that screams, “The rules are for other people.” This is a pattern, and it points to a man who sees his office as a license for personal entitlement. Bipartisan Condemnation The growing call for Swalwell to get out of public life isn’t some right-wing conspiracy. Of course, Republicans like Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) are demanding his expulsion. But his own Democratic colleagues are running for the exits, too. Rep. Eugene Vindman (D-VA) put it bluntly: “Representative Eric Swalwell needs to go.” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) has also signaled it’s time for him to leave. When both parties agree that a politician has disqualified himself from service, it’s no longer about politics. It’s about basic decency. Eric Swalwell’s career isn’t the victim of a smear campaign; it’s a casualty of his own actions. His vague apology for “mistakes in judgment” is a pathetic insult to everyone’s intelligence. Suspending his gubernatorial run was a desperate, cynical move to save his skin. For the sake of his constituents, the dignity of Congress, and the simple standard of character we must demand, Eric Swalwell needs to resign. Now. Key Takeaways Swalwell’s scandal reveals the Left’s glaring double standard on #MeToo allegations. Suspending a campaign is a political dodge; true accountability means resigning from Congress. A pattern of serious misconduct proves Swalwell is fundamentally unfit for public office. Bipartisan calls for his removal show this is about decency, not just politics. Sources: The Post Millennial, Axios The post Eric Swalwell Suspends California Gubernatorial Campaign Amid Sexual Misconduct Allegations appeared first on Patriot Journal.

Sen. Fetterman Breaks with Democrats, Accuses American Media of ‘Carrying Water for Iran’
Let’s be honest: in today’s political hurricane, finding a moment of pure, unvarnished clarity is practically a miracle. The D.C. establishment and its allies in the legacy media have become masters of illusion, spinning narratives so twisted that it’s a full-time job just figuring out which way is up. For years, patriots have watched as a bizarre instinct has taken hold in Washington: when America is threatened, the first impulse is not to defend her, but to attack the leader who dares to stand tall. This reflex to hamstring our own leaders, to apologize for American strength, and to view our adversaries with baffling sympathy has become the party line for the Left. It’s a predictable and utterly exhausting routine. But every once in a while, the truth erupts from the most unlikely source, cutting through the static like a lightning bolt and exposing the entire charade. From ‘Breitbart’: I can’t speak for my other Democrats, but the American media has, essentially, become — carrying water for Iran. And they’re describing the kinds of circumstances, then they forget the way Iran has behaved. And why can’t we just call what Iran has been — and what it continues to do, those things? America is the force of good in the world, and holding Iran accountable, what they’ve done, is important. Read that again. Those aren’t the words of a talk radio host or a Republican senator. That was Senator John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat, speaking a truth so potent it has become forbidden in his own party. In one stunning moment, he put his finger on the sickness that’s infected our entire political class: the media’s pathological need to play public defender for terrorist regimes while treating a duly elected American president as the real enemy. The Hysteria Fetterman Exposed Fetterman’s comment didn’t just come out of nowhere. He’s had a front-row seat to the very madness he described. As President Trump took decisive action to neutralize the threat from Iran—a strategy that, by the way, forced the mullahs into a ceasefire—Fetterman’s Democratic colleagues completely lost their minds. Instead of uniting behind the commander-in-chief, they saw a political opening. Senator Chris Murphy started screeching about the 25th Amendment, accusing the President of threatening to “eradicate an entire civilization.” Party bosses like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries worked overtime to pass resolutions to strip the president of his war powers, trying to tie his hands while he was in a staredown with a terrorist state. Their enemy wasn’t in Tehran; it was in the Oval Office. This is the textbook definition of “carrying water for Iran.” A Pattern of Common Sense For Fetterman, this clear-eyed view on national security is nothing new. While the rest of his party was clutching their pearls over President Trump’s earlier strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Fetterman broke from the pack, calling the move “entirely appropriate.” He was the only Democrat to vote against a war powers resolution designed to weaken the presidency, showing a rare flash of principle. He understands a simple concept that seems to fly over the heads of his colleagues: when a hostile regime sponsors terror and chants “Death to America,” you take them at their word. Frankly, he’s a walking fossil from an age when Democrats could still be patriots first and partisans second. His willingness to state the obvious makes him an alien in a party that’s become hopelessly captive to a radical, anti-American ideology. Strength, Not Surrender, Brings Peace The ultimate proof that Fetterman is right—and that Trump’s strategy works—is in the results. The Left and their media cheerleaders swore that Trump’s tough talk would ignite World War III. Instead, his strength and resolve produced a ceasefire. This outcome is a powerful reminder of the timeless conservative principle of peace through strength. Weakness and apology tours only invite aggression. A confident, powerful America, on the other hand, can secure its interests without endless war. It’s the same doctrine that enabled President Trump to forge a historic peace plan in the Middle East. Look, we’re not about to endorse Fetterman for anything, but you have to give credit where it’s due. That moment of honesty was priceless. He provided an insider’s confirmation of what conservatives have known all along: the modern Left and its media mouthpieces are fundamentally broken. They’ve let their seething hatred for one man completely eclipse their love of country. Fetterman just had the guts to say it out loud. Key Takeaways A top Democrat admitted the media shills for America’s enemies, like Iran. The Left’s hysterical reaction to Trump’s Iran policy proves Fetterman right. Conservative ‘Peace Through Strength’ gets results while the Left just panics. Common sense patriotism is now a fireable offense in the modern Democrat party. Sources: Breitbart, AOL The post Sen. Fetterman Breaks with Democrats, Accuses American Media of ‘Carrying Water for Iran’ appeared first on Patriot Journal.

Senator Jeff Merkley Calls for Military Leaders to Refuse President Trump’s Orders on Iran Infrastructure Strikes
Let’s get one thing straight: Peace isn’t some default setting for the world. It’s an achievement, hard-won and painstakingly maintained through strength, resolve, and the unwavering projection of American power. For years, we were told that peace in the Middle East was an impossible dream. Yet President Trump, through bold diplomacy and clear-eyed leadership, accomplished the unthinkable, securing a landmark peace plan and bringing our hostages home. This victory was a testament to what is possible when America leads with courage rather than apology. But the threats to such a fragile peace do not always come from foreign adversaries. Often, the real snakes are in our own backyard, coiled in the bitter rot of partisan hatred. There are those in Washington who cannot tolerate an American victory if it is delivered by a president they despise. In their consuming obsession to undermine him, they are willing to burn down the very institutions that keep us safe, whispering poison into the ears of those who have sworn to protect us. The latest, and perhaps most shocking, example comes from Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon. From ‘Fox News’: “President Trump’s profanity-laden Easter threat to attack Iran’s civilian infrastructure—power plants and bridges—are the words of a frustrated and immoral madman. Many experts agree that such attacks would be war crimes under international law,” Merkley wrote. “To our military leaders, remember this: You are legally required to refuse orders to commit war crimes,” he added. I don’t know about you, but I read that and my blood runs cold. Let’s call this what it is: not a policy disagreement, but an open invitation to mutiny. This is a United States Senator publicly calling for the men and women of our armed forces to break their oath, defy their Commander-in-Chief, and shatter the constitutional chain of command that has been the bedrock of our Republic for over 240 years. President Trump’s profanity-laden Easter threat to attack Iran’s civilian infrastructure—power plants and bridges—are the words of a frustrated and immoral madman. Many experts agree that such attacks would be war crimes under international law. To our military leaders, remember… — Senator Jeff Merkley (@SenJeffMerkley) April 6, 2026 A Betrayal of the Constitution Under Article II of the Constitution, the President of the United States is the sole Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy. This isn’t a suggestion; it is the law of the land. It ensures civilian control over the military, preventing the rise of warlords and ensuring that our armed forces serve the will of the people. Every soldier, sailor, airman, and Marine takes an oath to obey the lawful orders of the officers appointed over them—an unbroken chain that leads directly to the Oval Office. Since when does a senator from Oregon get to appoint himself the final arbiter of military orders? Senator Merkley’s reckless statement attempts to sever that chain. He seeks to plant a seed of doubt in the mind of every soldier, encouraging them to become a battlefield lawyer, second-guessing every command. This is a recipe for chaos, paralysis, and disaster. A military that debates its orders is a military that cannot fight and cannot win. Undermining Peace for Politics You really have to ask yourself, what’s the true motive here? It must just kill them to see President Trump succeed where so many others have failed. Why, at a time when American strength has finally brought a measure of stability to a volatile region, would a senator choose to signal such profound division to our enemies? The answer is as simple as it is ugly: partisan sabotage. For political nihilists like Merkley, the success of the Trump presidency is a greater threat than the ambitions of the Iranian regime. Rather than celebrate a historic peace, he seeks to weaken the President’s hand at a critical moment. He is telling Iran, and every other hostile nation, that America’s leadership is divided and its military’s loyalty is up for grabs. This is a profound betrayal of the national interest for the sake of petty political scoring. The Price of Division Think this political drama in D.C. doesn’t affect you? Think again. This seditious rhetoric has consequences that land right in your wallet. A nation that projects weakness and division invites aggression. When adversaries believe our President cannot command his own military, they are emboldened to test our resolve, whether by closing critical shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz or by threatening our allies. This instability directly impacts the global economy. It disrupts supply chains, creates uncertainty in the markets, and inevitably drives up the price of oil. The end result of Senator Merkley’s political gamesmanship will be higher prices at the pump for every hardworking citizen. His call for insubordination is not just a constitutional crisis; it is an economic threat to every family struggling to make ends meet. A line has been crossed. This is no longer about political disagreement. When a sitting U.S. Senator openly encourages our military to defy its constitutional commander, he forfeits his moral and legal authority to hold office. He has violated his own oath to support and defend the Constitution. For the sake of our security, our stability, and the future of the Republic, he must be removed from power. Key Takeaways A U.S. Senator is dangerously encouraging our military to defy the Constitution. Partisan hatred of President Trump is being placed above America’s national security. This radical rhetoric weakens America on the world stage and threatens our economy. Calling for insubordination is an act of sedition that disqualifies a leader from office. Sources: Fox News The post Senator Jeff Merkley Calls for Military Leaders to Refuse President Trump’s Orders on Iran Infrastructure Strikes appeared first on Patriot Journal.

Senator Jeff Merkley Calls for Military Leaders to Refuse President Trump’s Orders on Iran Infrastructure Strikes
Let’s get one thing straight: Peace isn’t some default setting for the world. It’s an achievement, hard-won and painstakingly maintained through strength, resolve, and the unwavering projection of American power. For years, we were told that peace in the Middle East was an impossible dream. Yet President Trump, through bold diplomacy and clear-eyed leadership, accomplished the unthinkable, securing a landmark peace plan and bringing our hostages home. This victory was a testament to what is possible when America leads with courage rather than apology. But the threats to such a fragile peace do not always come from foreign adversaries. Often, the real snakes are in our own backyard, coiled in the bitter rot of partisan hatred. There are those in Washington who cannot tolerate an American victory if it is delivered by a president they despise. In their consuming obsession to undermine him, they are willing to burn down the very institutions that keep us safe, whispering poison into the ears of those who have sworn to protect us. The latest, and perhaps most shocking, example comes from Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon. From ‘Fox News’: “President Trump’s profanity-laden Easter threat to attack Iran’s civilian infrastructure—power plants and bridges—are the words of a frustrated and immoral madman. Many experts agree that such attacks would be war crimes under international law,” Merkley wrote. “To our military leaders, remember this: You are legally required to refuse orders to commit war crimes,” he added. I don’t know about you, but I read that and my blood runs cold. Let’s call this what it is: not a policy disagreement, but an open invitation to mutiny. This is a United States Senator publicly calling for the men and women of our armed forces to break their oath, defy their Commander-in-Chief, and shatter the constitutional chain of command that has been the bedrock of our Republic for over 240 years. President Trump’s profanity-laden Easter threat to attack Iran’s civilian infrastructure—power plants and bridges—are the words of a frustrated and immoral madman. Many experts agree that such attacks would be war crimes under international law. To our military leaders, remember… — Senator Jeff Merkley (@SenJeffMerkley) April 6, 2026 A Betrayal of the Constitution Under Article II of the Constitution, the President of the United States is the sole Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy. This isn’t a suggestion; it is the law of the land. It ensures civilian control over the military, preventing the rise of warlords and ensuring that our armed forces serve the will of the people. Every soldier, sailor, airman, and Marine takes an oath to obey the lawful orders of the officers appointed over them—an unbroken chain that leads directly to the Oval Office. Since when does a senator from Oregon get to appoint himself the final arbiter of military orders? Senator Merkley’s reckless statement attempts to sever that chain. He seeks to plant a seed of doubt in the mind of every soldier, encouraging them to become a battlefield lawyer, second-guessing every command. This is a recipe for chaos, paralysis, and disaster. A military that debates its orders is a military that cannot fight and cannot win. Undermining Peace for Politics You really have to ask yourself, what’s the true motive here? It must just kill them to see President Trump succeed where so many others have failed. Why, at a time when American strength has finally brought a measure of stability to a volatile region, would a senator choose to signal such profound division to our enemies? The answer is as simple as it is ugly: partisan sabotage. For political nihilists like Merkley, the success of the Trump presidency is a greater threat than the ambitions of the Iranian regime. Rather than celebrate a historic peace, he seeks to weaken the President’s hand at a critical moment. He is telling Iran, and every other hostile nation, that America’s leadership is divided and its military’s loyalty is up for grabs. This is a profound betrayal of the national interest for the sake of petty political scoring. The Price of Division Think this political drama in D.C. doesn’t affect you? Think again. This seditious rhetoric has consequences that land right in your wallet. A nation that projects weakness and division invites aggression. When adversaries believe our President cannot command his own military, they are emboldened to test our resolve, whether by closing critical shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz or by threatening our allies. This instability directly impacts the global economy. It disrupts supply chains, creates uncertainty in the markets, and inevitably drives up the price of oil. The end result of Senator Merkley’s political gamesmanship will be higher prices at the pump for every hardworking citizen. His call for insubordination is not just a constitutional crisis; it is an economic threat to every family struggling to make ends meet. A line has been crossed. This is no longer about political disagreement. When a sitting U.S. Senator openly encourages our military to defy its constitutional commander, he forfeits his moral and legal authority to hold office. He has violated his own oath to support and defend the Constitution. For the sake of our security, our stability, and the future of the Republic, he must be removed from power. Key Takeaways A U.S. Senator is dangerously encouraging our military to defy the Constitution. Partisan hatred of President Trump is being placed above America’s national security. This radical rhetoric weakens America on the world stage and threatens our economy. Calling for insubordination is an act of sedition that disqualifies a leader from office. Sources: Fox News The post Senator Jeff Merkley Calls for Military Leaders to Refuse President Trump’s Orders on Iran Infrastructure Strikes appeared first on Patriot Journal.

Trump Signs Order Directing DHS To Pay TSA Workers Amid Airport Chaos Standoff With Democrats
You’ve seen this script a thousand times. The political theater in Washington gets louder, but nothing actually gets done. It’s a swamp of endless bickering and cynical power plays, all while hardworking Americans are left to deal with the fallout. Our so-called leaders seem to have forgotten who they work for, creating gridlock that spills out of the D.C. bubble and into our daily lives. And this week, that dysfunction landed squarely in our nation’s airports—just in time for spring break, of course. Families looking for a well-deserved vacation were instead greeted by pure bedlam: colossal lines, canceled flights, and a security system teetering on the edge of collapse. The system designed to protect us was grinding to a halt, not because of a national disaster, but because of a political game. While Americans were left stranded, President Donald J. Trump made it crystal clear who is to blame—and what he was going to do about it. From ‘The Post Millennial’: The Radical Left Democrats, and their ‘Leader,’ Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, have made it very clear where they stand, and that is, ON THE SIDE OF CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS, AND NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. They are refusing to fund Immigration Enforcement unless the Republicans agree to their Open Border Policies, which will never, ever happen again. Classic. While Democrats were busy grandstanding, President Trump was actually governing. He saw a crisis his opponents deliberately engineered and, unlike them, refused to let the American people be collateral damage. This isn’t the move of a typical D.C. creature; it’s the mark of a leader. On Thursday, he announced he was signing an executive order instructing the Department of Homeland Security to immediately pay our hardworking TSA agents. In the end, it wasn’t necessary, because it forced the Senate’s hand to finally end the shutdown and fund the TSA. Democrats Hold Security Hostage So why the meltdown? You can’t make this stuff up. Democrats in the Senate decided that hamstringing our immigration laws was more important than paying the very people who keep our airports safe. For weeks, they refused to pass a funding bill for DHS, causing TSA agents to miss paychecks. Predictably, agents started quitting or calling out sick, leading directly to the chaos. Their demand was as cynical as it gets: no funding for DHS unless Republicans agreed to gut ICE. They were willing to sacrifice the safety and security of American travelers to cripple the agency responsible for enforcing our immigration laws. This wasn’t a negotiation; it was political extortion, with the livelihoods of federal agents as their bargaining chip. Putting Americans First The contrast in priorities is staggering. While the Left tried to dismantle our national security apparatus, Republicans in the Senate tried to find a solution. Republicans practically begged them to come to the table. As Wyoming Senator John Barrasso noted, the GOP left a funding vote open for five hours, waiting for a negotiation that never came. The Democrats weren’t interested in a deal; they were interested in a fight. When it became obvious that good-faith negotiation was impossible, President Trump stepped in. In his statement, he didn’t just solve the problem—he stood firmly with the men and women on the front lines. “I want to thank our hardworking TSA Agents and also, ICE, for the incredible help they have given us at the Airports,” he declared. At a time when the Left vilifies law enforcement, President Trump offers his unwavering support. The turmoil at our airports was never about a budget dispute. It was a calculated move by the radical Left to create chaos and advance an agenda that puts illegal immigrants ahead of American citizens. His decisive action is a powerful reminder of the difference between a statesman and a political arsonist. One builds up the country, while the other is happy to watch it burn for a few poll points. When it comes to putting America first, the choice has never been clearer. Key Takeaways President Trump took decisive action to end the airport chaos created by Democrats. Democrats held national security hostage to push their radical open-borders agenda. True leadership means solving problems, not manufacturing crises for political gain. Supporting our law enforcement is a non-negotiable part of keeping America safe. Sources: The Post Millennial, POLITICO The post Trump Signs Order Directing DHS To Pay TSA Workers Amid Airport Chaos Standoff With Democrats appeared first on Patriot Journal.

Trump Signs Order Directing DHS To Pay TSA Workers Amid Airport Chaos Standoff With Democrats
You’ve seen this script a thousand times. The political theater in Washington gets louder, but nothing actually gets done. It’s a swamp of endless bickering and cynical power plays, all while hardworking Americans are left to deal with the fallout. Our so-called leaders seem to have forgotten who they work for, creating gridlock that spills out of the D.C. bubble and into our daily lives. And this week, that dysfunction landed squarely in our nation’s airports—just in time for spring break, of course. Families looking for a well-deserved vacation were instead greeted by pure bedlam: colossal lines, canceled flights, and a security system teetering on the edge of collapse. The system designed to protect us was grinding to a halt, not because of a national disaster, but because of a political game. While Americans were left stranded, President Donald J. Trump made it crystal clear who is to blame—and what he was going to do about it. From ‘The Post Millennial’: The Radical Left Democrats, and their ‘Leader,’ Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, have made it very clear where they stand, and that is, ON THE SIDE OF CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS, AND NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. They are refusing to fund Immigration Enforcement unless the Republicans agree to their Open Border Policies, which will never, ever happen again. Classic. While Democrats were busy grandstanding, President Trump was actually governing. He saw a crisis his opponents deliberately engineered and, unlike them, refused to let the American people be collateral damage. This isn’t the move of a typical D.C. creature; it’s the mark of a leader. On Thursday, he announced he was signing an executive order instructing the Department of Homeland Security to immediately pay our hardworking TSA agents. In the end, it wasn’t necessary, because it forced the Senate’s hand to finally end the shutdown and fund the TSA. Democrats Hold Security Hostage So why the meltdown? You can’t make this stuff up. Democrats in the Senate decided that hamstringing our immigration laws was more important than paying the very people who keep our airports safe. For weeks, they refused to pass a funding bill for DHS, causing TSA agents to miss paychecks. Predictably, agents started quitting or calling out sick, leading directly to the chaos. Their demand was as cynical as it gets: no funding for DHS unless Republicans agreed to gut ICE. They were willing to sacrifice the safety and security of American travelers to cripple the agency responsible for enforcing our immigration laws. This wasn’t a negotiation; it was political extortion, with the livelihoods of federal agents as their bargaining chip. Putting Americans First The contrast in priorities is staggering. While the Left tried to dismantle our national security apparatus, Republicans in the Senate tried to find a solution. Republicans practically begged them to come to the table. As Wyoming Senator John Barrasso noted, the GOP left a funding vote open for five hours, waiting for a negotiation that never came. The Democrats weren’t interested in a deal; they were interested in a fight. When it became obvious that good-faith negotiation was impossible, President Trump stepped in. In his statement, he didn’t just solve the problem—he stood firmly with the men and women on the front lines. “I want to thank our hardworking TSA Agents and also, ICE, for the incredible help they have given us at the Airports,” he declared. At a time when the Left vilifies law enforcement, President Trump offers his unwavering support. The turmoil at our airports was never about a budget dispute. It was a calculated move by the radical Left to create chaos and advance an agenda that puts illegal immigrants ahead of American citizens. His decisive action is a powerful reminder of the difference between a statesman and a political arsonist. One builds up the country, while the other is happy to watch it burn for a few poll points. When it comes to putting America first, the choice has never been clearer. Key Takeaways President Trump took decisive action to end the airport chaos created by Democrats. Democrats held national security hostage to push their radical open-borders agenda. True leadership means solving problems, not manufacturing crises for political gain. Supporting our law enforcement is a non-negotiable part of keeping America safe. Sources: The Post Millennial, POLITICO The post Trump Signs Order Directing DHS To Pay TSA Workers Amid Airport Chaos Standoff With Democrats appeared first on Patriot Journal.