9 stories credited to The Nerd Stash
Latest story Sep 20, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for The Nerd Stash
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 7 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to The Nerd Stash, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from The Nerd Stash
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| April 2026 | 8 | 4,464 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 1 | 1,320 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Ethics/Corruption5
56% of 9 stories · 58% across all outlets
- Economy4
44% of 9 stories · 26% across all outlets
- Environment/Climate3
33% of 9 stories · 5% across all outlets
- Foreign Policy3
33% of 9 stories · 29% across all outlets
- Budget/Spending2
22% of 9 stories · 31% across all outlets
- Defense/Military2
22% of 9 stories · 25% across all outlets
- Healthcare2
22% of 9 stories · 8% across all outlets
- Education1
11% of 9 stories · 3% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 11 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 12 story–official pairs, from 9 stories.
- Democrat58% · 7 pairs
- Republican42% · 5 pairs
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 9 stories.
- 1John BarrassoR2 stories · 22%
- 2Amy KlobucharD1 story · 11%
- 3Cynthia LummisR1 story · 11%
- 4Donald TrumpR1 story · 11%
- 5John FettermanD1 story · 11%
- 6Lauren UnderwoodD1 story · 11%
- 7Pramila JayapalD1 story · 11%
- 8Robert F. Kennedy Jr.R1 story · 11%
- 9Seth MagazinerD1 story · 11%
- 10Summer LeeD1 story · 11%
+ 1 other official (1 story–official pair)
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not The Nerd Stash’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 9 stories.
- Good Look
- 0 (0%)
- Mixed
- 5 (56%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 4 (44%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from thenerdstash.com
12
Illinois Rep. Lauren Underwood Introduces 2 Bills as House Leaves Washington Early: 'We're Not Done Legislating'
Rep. Lauren Underwood of Illinois highlighted two bills she introduced as House lawmakers left Washington earlier than originally scheduled ahead of the November midterms. Underwood used the moment to promote legislation addressing veterans' suicide prevention and the nursing workforce, while criti
Wyoming Citizens Upset After Senator Lummis Said She’s ‘Worried’ about Subsidized Meals: ‘She Doesn’t Care About the Working Class’
We all know that politicians almost always tend to say things that make other people raise their eyebrows in doubt, and one of these political figures who is under the wrong spotlight is none other than Senator Cynthia Lummis from Wyoming. During a recent interview, the Senator expressed her concern for people turning to subsidized food programs. However, despite her attempt to show concern and worry, Redditors and several Wyoming residents didn’t buy it, which turned the situation on Lummis. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY): We had record distributions in my county in Wyoming of Meals on Wheels, which is an indication that more and more people are turning to subsidized food opportunities.So I’m worried, and I admit that. But for now, I have patience. byu/Conscious-Quarter423 inwyoming The interview comes from Scott MacFarlane News, who shared a clip of Sen. Cynthia Lummis discussing her concern about record distributions of Meals on Wheels. We had record distributions in my county in Wyoming of Meals on Wheels, which is an indication that more and more people are turning to subsidized food opportunities. So I’m worried, and I admit that. But for now, I have patience. While Senator Lummis admits she’s worried about people turning to Meals on Wheels, Redditors, and Wyoming residents didn’t buy her comments, as many believe she’s just posing to look good and doesn’t care about citizens at all. Wyoming Residents Are Not Buying Senator Lummis’ Latest Comments Even if her comments might have had a good intention, people saw it the other way, turning this seemingly positive situation into something negative for this Wyoming representative. As you can see in some Reddit comments, people quickly turned on the Senator and shared a few unfriendly opinions about her. “She’s not worried. She doesn’t care about the working class.“ “Taking a page out of Susan Collins’s book, I see.“ Beyond that, others are heavily criticizing Lummis, claiming that she is not doing her job well lately, noting that some of these issues could be resolved faster if she did things differently instead of just worrying about what is happening in the state. “She’s given up even responding to emails and calls without multiple follow-ups, and even then, she just parrots the White House, well, all three of our senators, and representatives do.“ “It is good to have patience. Having the patience to endure things you can help change is stupidity. Almost all of the problems Americans are experiencing are unnecessary.“ Related: ‘Leave Wyoming Out of This’: Locals Afraid as Microsoft Intends to Triple Its Cheyenne Data Center Footprint As you can see, things aren’t looking great for Senator Lummis, and, according to many, this last interview didn’t help her at all. Furthermore, several residents believe she’s giving up, as “being patient” isn’t the same as taking action, and people would love for the Senator and other representatives to do more of the latter. The post Wyoming Citizens Upset After Senator Lummis Said She’s ‘Worried’ about Subsidized Meals: ‘She Doesn’t Care About the Working Class’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal Faces Backlash After Saying Immigrants Built the U.S.: ‘Democrats Are Trying to Rewrite Our History’
Washington representative Pramila Jayapal is facing backlash online after remarks in which she said that immigrants built the United States, sparking debate and strong reactions across social media. Jayapal’s statement came during an interview discussing immigration policy and comments about the Trump administration’s stance toward the Somali immigrant community in Minnesota. Pramila Jayapal is known for her pro-immigration position and advocacy for immigrant rights. She has consistently supported expanding legal protections for immigrants in the United States, including undocumented individuals, and often emphasizes that immigrants should be treated with dignity, fairness, and access to legal protections. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D): "USA was built by Somalis, Indians, Latinos, Africans" pic.twitter.com/vhQjnlK9dB — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) April 18, 2026 In the interview, Jayapal said that many Americans, regardless of political affiliation, recognize that immigrants from all over the world have built the United States. She referenced communities including Somalis, Indians, Latinos, and Africans as examples. “Immigrants have built this country and make this country what it is today,” she added. The video is gaining attention due to remarks made by Pramila Jayapal during an interview discussing immigration and national identity in the United States. The comments have sparked debate online about the role of immigrants in the country’s development, differing interpretations of American history, and broader political disagreements over immigration policy and rhetoric. Outrage At Washington Representative Pramila Jayapal’s Statement The video sparked reactions online. Many viewers reacted strongly to the comments made by Washington Representative Pramila Jayapal during the interview, with some accusing her of misrepresenting U.S. history. “Democrats are trying to rewrite our history. She left out 1 word. ‘USA “Invasion” was built by Somalis, Indians, Latinos, Africans,’” one person wrote. Another commenter made a harsher statement, saying, “Somalis are only good at scamming and stealing. This country was built by white men with vision. That’s why everybody wants to come here.” Related: Colorado Angry As New Law Cuts Immigrants Off From SNAP Benefits ‘Don’t want my taxes supporting illegals’ Many viewers continued criticizing the remarks made by Jayapal, with some posting strongly worded responses online. “Pramila needs to be deported for her stupidity alone,” one person wrote. Another commenter added, “Nah, there aren’t any 2nd or 3rd worlders included in the history of building our country. They didn’t build anything. They just take from what we’ve built. Western European settlers, our ancestors, found undeveloped land and built what we have today.” The video featuring Pramila Jayapal was controversial to many viewers and sparked significant backlash online, with strong disagreement over her comments and wider debate about immigration and American history. The post Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal Faces Backlash After Saying Immigrants Built the U.S.: ‘Democrats Are Trying to Rewrite Our History’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee Confronts RFK Jr. at D.C. Hearing: ‘How We Could Solve The Black Maternal Mortality Crisis If We Can’t Say Black?’
A heated exchange between Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at a recent congressional hearing is making the rounds online. The core of their back-and-forth is a question that sounds simple but actually explores a complicated debate in federal health policy: How do you tackle a crisis that impacts a specific group when the government won’t let you even name that group in official language? Democratic House Rep. Summer Lee grills RFK Jr: "Do you have an idea of how we could solve the Black maternal mortality crisis if we can't say 'Black?’” byu/mlg1981 inFauxmoi The incident took place on April 16, 2026, when Kennedy showed up before the House Ways and Means Committee. That hearing was already making headlines, with Democrats grilling the HHS Secretary about the administration’s proposed 12.5% budget cut to the department, $5 billion of that from the NIH alone. Summer Lee, representing Pennsylvania’s 12th district and known for speaking out on racial health disparities, used her time to spotlight Black maternal mortality. That crisis, based on data several lawmakers brought up, means Black women in the U.S. are dying from pregnancy-related causes at nearly three times the rate of white women. Pennsylvania Rep. Lee’s post and official press release make it clear: The Trump administration told federal programs to strip around 200 words and phrases, including “Black”, from funding applications. Against that backdrop, Lee asked a pointed question: “Do you have an idea of how we could solve the Black maternal mortality crisis if we can’t say Black?” Kennedy shifted the conversation back to the anti-DEI agenda. He said President Trump wants to end division, not create it, and blamed DEI programs for dividing and polarizing people over the last four years. Lee pushed back right away, reminding him they were talking about healthcare, not an ideological debate. Kennedy stuck with his DEI argument. So Lee pressed further: How can you target spending, research, or intervention toward a population facing disproportionate harm if you won’t even name them? Kennedy insisted the government was meeting its responsibility for maternal health, but Lee shot back bluntly: “We are not.” Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee’s Tense Exchange With RFK Jr. Gets People Talking Reactions online were pointed and largely one-sided in their frustration with Kennedy’s responses. “Bless her for that immense professionalism and patience she has. I loudly protested in my own car to his answers,” one person wrote on Reddit. Some used dark humor to underscore the absurdity they saw in the administration’s priorities. “Sorry, no time for healthcare funding. There are raccoon *expletive* that need capturing,” one user wrote, while another added: “Research that involves the chainsawing of whale heads also cannot be ignored at this critical time.” Others widened the lens on the problem beyond Black women. “It’s not just black, bro. You can’t even say women, you can’t say fetus, you can’t say ANYTHING that alludes to anyone that isn’t white. It’s nuts,” a user commented. Some connected Kennedy’s responses to broader patterns in his record. “RFK Jr perpetuates the racist lie that black people have a higher threshold for pain than white people, but then wants to close any avenue of studies for health aimed at people of color. He’s a racist, full stop,” one person wrote. Others framed the moment through the lens of Kennedy’s own family history. “I still cannot get over that he’s JFK’s nephew and RFK’s son. It makes me want to believe in an afterlife so they give him an *expletive* whooping for what he’s done to the American people and the Kennedy legacy,” a user commented. Related: Shocking Confrontation As Pennsylvania Musician Targeted Over Amp: ‘What an Insufferable Person’ The clip stands out because it doesn’t get lost in the usual chaos of a hearing. It hits a question you can’t answer honestly without admitting either a flaw in the administration’s logic or defending a policy choice that a lot of people just can’t swallow. The post Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee Confronts RFK Jr. at D.C. Hearing: ‘How We Could Solve The Black Maternal Mortality Crisis If We Can’t Say Black?’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee Confronts RFK Jr. at D.C. Hearing: ‘How We Could Solve The Black Maternal Mortality Crisis If We Can’t Say Black?’
A heated exchange between Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at a recent congressional hearing is making the rounds online. The core of their back-and-forth is a question that sounds simple but actually explores a complicated debate in federal health policy: How do you tackle a crisis that impacts a specific group when the government won’t let you even name that group in official language? Democratic House Rep. Summer Lee grills RFK Jr: "Do you have an idea of how we could solve the Black maternal mortality crisis if we can't say 'Black?’” byu/mlg1981 inFauxmoi The incident took place on April 16, 2026, when Kennedy showed up before the House Ways and Means Committee. That hearing was already making headlines, with Democrats grilling the HHS Secretary about the administration’s proposed 12.5% budget cut to the department, $5 billion of that from the NIH alone. Summer Lee, representing Pennsylvania’s 12th district and known for speaking out on racial health disparities, used her time to spotlight Black maternal mortality. That crisis, based on data several lawmakers brought up, means Black women in the U.S. are dying from pregnancy-related causes at nearly three times the rate of white women. Pennsylvania Rep. Lee’s post and official press release make it clear: The Trump administration told federal programs to strip around 200 words and phrases, including “Black”, from funding applications. Against that backdrop, Lee asked a pointed question: “Do you have an idea of how we could solve the Black maternal mortality crisis if we can’t say Black?” Kennedy shifted the conversation back to the anti-DEI agenda. He said President Trump wants to end division, not create it, and blamed DEI programs for dividing and polarizing people over the last four years. Lee pushed back right away, reminding him they were talking about healthcare, not an ideological debate. Kennedy stuck with his DEI argument. So Lee pressed further: How can you target spending, research, or intervention toward a population facing disproportionate harm if you won’t even name them? Kennedy insisted the government was meeting its responsibility for maternal health, but Lee shot back bluntly: “We are not.” Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee’s Tense Exchange With RFK Jr. Gets People Talking Reactions online were pointed and largely one-sided in their frustration with Kennedy’s responses. “Bless her for that immense professionalism and patience she has. I loudly protested in my own car to his answers,” one person wrote on Reddit. Some used dark humor to underscore the absurdity they saw in the administration’s priorities. “Sorry, no time for healthcare funding. There are raccoon *expletive* that need capturing,” one user wrote, while another added: “Research that involves the chainsawing of whale heads also cannot be ignored at this critical time.” Others widened the lens on the problem beyond Black women. “It’s not just black, bro. You can’t even say women, you can’t say fetus, you can’t say ANYTHING that alludes to anyone that isn’t white. It’s nuts,” a user commented. Some connected Kennedy’s responses to broader patterns in his record. “RFK Jr perpetuates the racist lie that black people have a higher threshold for pain than white people, but then wants to close any avenue of studies for health aimed at people of color. He’s a racist, full stop,” one person wrote. Others framed the moment through the lens of Kennedy’s own family history. “I still cannot get over that he’s JFK’s nephew and RFK’s son. It makes me want to believe in an afterlife so they give him an *expletive* whooping for what he’s done to the American people and the Kennedy legacy,” a user commented. Related: Shocking Confrontation As Pennsylvania Musician Targeted Over Amp: ‘What an Insufferable Person’ The clip stands out because it doesn’t get lost in the usual chaos of a hearing. It hits a question you can’t answer honestly without admitting either a flaw in the administration’s logic or defending a policy choice that a lot of people just can’t swallow. The post Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee Confronts RFK Jr. at D.C. Hearing: ‘How We Could Solve The Black Maternal Mortality Crisis If We Can’t Say Black?’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Minnesota Boils Over as Senate Showdown Intensifies in Boundary Waters Fight: ‘Profits disguised as patriotism’
Minnesota’s long-running battle over the future of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness reached a new flashpoint this week, as Senator Tina Smith took to the Senate floor to push back against efforts to roll back federal protections tied to a proposed mining project. In a speech framed around environmental stewardship and economic skepticism, Smith argued the project would ultimately benefit foreign interests more than American workers. She warned that extracted minerals could be sent overseas for processing before being sold back on the open market, undercutting claims that the effort aligns with “America First” priorities. Smith’s message was blunt. The issue, she said, is not mining itself, but location and consequence. The Boundary Waters, one of the most protected and visited wilderness areas in the United States, represents a line she and others are unwilling to cross. She urged colleagues to reject the resolution, emphasizing that public lands should not be leveraged for what she described as limited domestic gain and significant long-term risk. Senator Amy Klobuchar followed, reinforcing concerns about the legislation’s procedural mechanism and its broader implications for public lands nationwide. Drawing on her family’s mining roots, Klobuchar framed the debate as one that requires both respect for labor history and adherence to science-based review. She questioned whether the current push reflects either. Local Reaction Boils Over Back in Minnesota, reaction has been unfiltered. In local online communities, such as the Minnesota subreddit, discussion lit up following Smith’s remarks, with many users expressing relief that the legislation is facing resistance. “Good. Foreign mining on that beautiful land. Just to buy it back from China. Why are Republicans are chuds?” wrote one commenter, capturing a sentiment that quickly gained traction. Others focused on the economic contradictions. “It’ll cost us money to mine our own stuff using a mostly automated mine that provides few jobs but kills thousands of others,” another user argued, pointing to concerns about long-term regional impact. Skepticism over who ultimately benefits from the project surfaced repeatedly. “Profits disguised as patriotism,” one post read, while another added, “This isn’t about northern Minnesota. It’s about profits for companies.” Related: Minnesota Erupts Over Impeachment Push Tied to $9B Fraud Allegations Against Gov. Walz: ‘Tim Walz Needs to Venmo Taxpayers Before He Goes to Jail’ Some residents, particularly those in northern parts of the state, voiced frustration with political representation. “It’s always nice when he says this isn’t about the place and people I’m supposed to represent,” one Ely-based commenter said, referencing remarks from Rep. Pete Stauber supporting the resolution on national security grounds. Despite the heated rhetoric, a throughline remains clear. For many Minnesotans, the Boundary Waters fight is not abstract policy. It is local, immediate, and deeply tied to identity. As the Senate vote looms, that tension between national strategy and regional consequence is only becoming more pronounced. The post Minnesota Boils Over as Senate Showdown Intensifies in Boundary Waters Fight: ‘Profits disguised as patriotism’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Minnesota Boils Over as Senate Showdown Intensifies in Boundary Waters Fight: ‘Profits disguised as patriotism’
Minnesota’s long-running battle over the future of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness reached a new flashpoint this week, as Senator Tina Smith took to the Senate floor to push back against efforts to roll back federal protections tied to a proposed mining project. In a speech framed around environmental stewardship and economic skepticism, Smith argued the project would ultimately benefit foreign interests more than American workers. She warned that extracted minerals could be sent overseas for processing before being sold back on the open market, undercutting claims that the effort aligns with “America First” priorities. Smith’s message was blunt. The issue, she said, is not mining itself, but location and consequence. The Boundary Waters, one of the most protected and visited wilderness areas in the United States, represents a line she and others are unwilling to cross. She urged colleagues to reject the resolution, emphasizing that public lands should not be leveraged for what she described as limited domestic gain and significant long-term risk. Senator Amy Klobuchar followed, reinforcing concerns about the legislation’s procedural mechanism and its broader implications for public lands nationwide. Drawing on her family’s mining roots, Klobuchar framed the debate as one that requires both respect for labor history and adherence to science-based review. She questioned whether the current push reflects either. Local Reaction Boils Over Back in Minnesota, reaction has been unfiltered. In local online communities, such as the Minnesota subreddit, discussion lit up following Smith’s remarks, with many users expressing relief that the legislation is facing resistance. “Good. Foreign mining on that beautiful land. Just to buy it back from China. Why are Republicans are chuds?” wrote one commenter, capturing a sentiment that quickly gained traction. Others focused on the economic contradictions. “It’ll cost us money to mine our own stuff using a mostly automated mine that provides few jobs but kills thousands of others,” another user argued, pointing to concerns about long-term regional impact. Skepticism over who ultimately benefits from the project surfaced repeatedly. “Profits disguised as patriotism,” one post read, while another added, “This isn’t about northern Minnesota. It’s about profits for companies.” Related: Minnesota Erupts Over Impeachment Push Tied to $9B Fraud Allegations Against Gov. Walz: ‘Tim Walz Needs to Venmo Taxpayers Before He Goes to Jail’ Some residents, particularly those in northern parts of the state, voiced frustration with political representation. “It’s always nice when he says this isn’t about the place and people I’m supposed to represent,” one Ely-based commenter said, referencing remarks from Rep. Pete Stauber supporting the resolution on national security grounds. Despite the heated rhetoric, a throughline remains clear. For many Minnesotans, the Boundary Waters fight is not abstract policy. It is local, immediate, and deeply tied to identity. As the Senate vote looms, that tension between national strategy and regional consequence is only becoming more pronounced. The post Minnesota Boils Over as Senate Showdown Intensifies in Boundary Waters Fight: ‘Profits disguised as patriotism’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Wyoming Shocked after Senator Barrasco Claims Democrats ‘Like’ the High Gas Prices: ‘You’re Not a Very Good Liar, John’
Many of us have grown accustomed to what politicians always say, yet there are still a few instances where some of their claims shock us and leave us wondering if they have their facts straight. This is precisely what happened to many residents in Wyoming, as Senator John Barrasco said today, a few questionable things during an interview. According to the Senator, Democrats are okay with high gas prices because of their “radical climate agenda.” As you can imagine, this comment shocked several people, making them wonder where the Senator got this information from. asked about high gas prices on Fox News, Sen. John Barrasso claims "Democrats like high gas prices because of their radical climate agenda. So people understand what the president is doing and agree with him" byu/EvolvingCyborg inwyoming The interview took place today with the crew at Fox News, and while we’re focusing on one particular clip, here’s the full interview for those who want to watch it all. The clip shared on the Wyoming subreddit quickly caught the attention of many. During the interview, he was asked whether gas prices were on people’s minds in Wyoming, to which he replied the following. Yeah. Gas prices are on their minds as they always are. They also understand that what the president is doing in an effort to provide stability will have good long-term impacts in terms of energy prices. However, people noticed something strange as Senator John Barrasco continued talking about the prices, yet said something that caught the attention of many. They also understand republicans are the party of energy dominance. Democrats like high gas prices because of their radical climate agenda. This last comment turned a lot of people’s heads, as they wondered where he got the information. According to some Redditors, many disagree with Barrasco’s statements, as the country has been complaining about increasingly high gas prices lately. Wyoming Citizens Disagree With Senator Barrasco’s Latest Claims It didn’t take long for people to question Barrasco’s latest statement, and many quickly shared their thoughts on how wrong the Senator was by claiming Democrats like expensive gas prices. “I can accept that some politicians will have different views. What I cannot accept is that he doesn’t even try to make sense. Democrats like high gas prices, so the president is raising gas prices to…hurt Democrats? What?“ “Why would Democrats like high gas prices?“ Several other Redditors criticized Senator Barrasco in the comments, saying his claims were unfounded and looked bad, especially coming from someone representing Wyoming. “I do love my Senators putting their party before Wyoming.“ “You’re not a very good liar, John.“ Related: ‘Classic Entitled Boomer’: Cruel Wyoming Husband Feeds Wife ‘Expired or Rotten’ Food Because He ‘Doesn’t Believe in Expiration Dates’ In the end, as we’ve seen in several other places across the country, people are unhappy with gas prices, and even more so because there have been warnings that prices will go up while the war is still going on. The post Wyoming Shocked after Senator Barrasco Claims Democrats ‘Like’ the High Gas Prices: ‘You’re Not a Very Good Liar, John’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Wyoming Senator John Barrasso Accuses Democrats of ‘Liking’ High Gas Prices: ‘Not a Good Liar’
Comments from Wyoming Senator John Barrasso are drawing attention after remarks he made during a recent interview about gas prices and climate policy. In the exchange, Barrasso suggested that Democrats are comfortable with higher gas prices due to what he described as a “radical climate agenda,” prompting reactions from viewers online. asked about high gas prices on Fox News, Sen. John Barrasso claims "Democrats like high gas prices because of their radical climate agenda. So people understand what the president is doing and agree with him" byu/EvolvingCyborg inwyoming The interview took place today with the crew at Fox News, and while we’re focusing on one particular clip, here’s the full interview for those who want to watch it all. The clip shared on the Wyoming subreddit quickly caught the attention of many. During the interview, he was asked whether gas prices were on people’s minds in Wyoming, to which he replied the following. Yeah. Gas prices are on their minds as they always are. They also understand that what the president is doing in an effort to provide stability will have good long-term impacts in terms of energy prices. However, people noticed something strange as Senator John Barrasco continued talking about the prices, yet said something that caught the attention of many. They also understand republicans are the party of energy dominance. Democrats like high gas prices because of their radical climate agenda. This last comment turned a lot of people’s heads, as they wondered where he got the information. According to some Redditors, many disagree with Barrasco’s statements, as the country has been complaining about increasingly high gas prices lately. Wyoming Citizens Disagree With Senator Barrasco’s Latest Claims It didn’t take long for people to question Barrasco’s latest statement, and many quickly shared their thoughts on how wrong the Senator was by claiming Democrats like expensive gas prices. “I can accept that some politicians will have different views. What I cannot accept is that he doesn’t even try to make sense. Democrats like high gas prices, so the president is raising gas prices to…hurt Democrats? What?“ “Why would Democrats like high gas prices?“ Several other Redditors criticized Senator Barrasco in the comments, saying his claims were unfounded and looked bad, especially coming from someone representing Wyoming. “I do love my Senators putting their party before Wyoming.“ “You’re not a very good liar, John.“ Related: ‘Classic Entitled Boomer’: Cruel Wyoming Husband Feeds Wife ‘Expired or Rotten’ Food Because He ‘Doesn’t Believe in Expiration Dates’ In the end, as we’ve seen in several other places across the country, people are unhappy with gas prices, and even more so because there have been warnings that prices will go up while the war is still going on. The post Wyoming Senator John Barrasso Accuses Democrats of ‘Liking’ High Gas Prices: ‘Not a Good Liar’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Pennsylvania Erupts After Sen. Fetterman Breaks With Democrats on Iran Vote: ‘He Is Not the Man We Voted For’
Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman is once again breaking with members of his own party, confirming he will vote against a renewed war powers resolution aimed at halting U.S. military action against Iran. Speaking on Fox News, the Pennsylvania Democrat said he would oppose the measure expected to reach the Senate floor next week, arguing the military must be allowed to complete its objectives under the ongoing operation in Iran. “We have to stand with our military,” Fetterman said, framing the strikes as necessary while reiterating his long-standing support for Israel. The move places him at odds with prominent Democrats, including Sens. Tim Kaine, Cory Booker, and Chris Murphy, who have pushed for congressional oversight of military engagement. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has also backed efforts to reassert Congress’s authority to declare war, particularly amid concerns about escalating rhetoric from former President Donald Trump. Fetterman has been the lone Democrat to consistently oppose such measures, aligning instead with a more hawkish stance that has drawn increasing scrutiny back home. “Not the Man We Voted For” Across Pennsylvania, reaction has largely been critical, with many voters questioning both the decision and the senator himself. Over on a popular Reddit thread in Pennsylvania’s community subreddit discussing the news, frustration has turned personal. One upvoted comment read, “He is not the man I voted for. I was expecting common sense.” Others were far more direct in questioning his judgment. “Once again I’d like to remind everyone that this man literally got brain damage and now he is voting with Republicans,” one user wrote, echoing a sentiment repeated throughout the discussion. Another added, “It’s either that or he just played everyone.” The criticism certainly reflects an erosion of trust among some Pennsylvania voters who once viewed Fetterman as a progressive outsider. Several commenters pointed to a perceived shift in his political identity since taking office, particularly on foreign policy and immigration. “Regardless of the reason, he became someone I will vote against,” one user wrote, summing up a common refrain. While online discourse often skews harsh, the consistency of the response highlights a growing divide between Fetterman and parts of his base. For critics, the issue is not just the Iran vote, but what they see as a pattern of decisions that feel increasingly out of step. As Congress prepares for another vote on war powers, the political fallout in Pennsylvania suggests the debate is no longer confined to Washington. The post Pennsylvania Erupts After Sen. Fetterman Breaks With Democrats on Iran Vote: ‘He Is Not the Man We Voted For’ appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Rhode Island Congressman Slams Trump For Admitting Tax Payer Money Is Being Spent on Wars, Not Daycare
President Donald Trump stirred up a storm during the White House Easter lunch when he laid out his reasons for cutting federal funding for daycare. He didn’t mince words: “We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare.” That comment spread across social media, especially after Rhode Island Congressman Seth Magaziner posted the clip and weighed in on X. Now, users are arguing about how the government spends its money, whether it puts military needs above basic services, and what it really owes to everyday Americans. So he admits that he is spending our tax money on endless wars instead of childcare, Medicare, and Medicaid. It doesn’t have to be this way. https://t.co/qcdxCFOJQA — Congressman Seth Magaziner (@Rep_Magaziner) April 2, 2026 The comments came at a private Easter lunch in the White House East Room, with over 100 faith leaders in the room. The White House actually put the video on YouTube at first, then made it private. However, Newsweek and plenty of people on social media had already shared it. Rep. Magaziner from Rhode Island’s 2nd District, who has been outspoken against Medicaid cuts, posted the clip with a sharp message: “So he admits that he’s using our tax money for endless wars instead of childcare, Medicare, and Medicaid. It doesn’t have to be this way.” Meanwhile, Trump told the room he had given OMB Director Russell Vought a clear order: “Don’t send any money for daycare because the United States can’t take care of daycare.” He kept going: “We can’t take care of daycare. We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people. We’re fighting wars. You got to let a state take care of daycare, and they should pay for it, too. They’ll have to raise their taxes, but they should pay for it.” Internet Reacts to Rhode Island Congressman’s Comments About Trump Reactions were divided sharply along political lines. Some commenters pushed back on the framing of federal involvement in childcare altogether. “I understand that many think the federal government should stick its nose in everything. But there is absolutely no reason for the federal government to be involved in daycare,” one person wrote. Another took a harder line: “Childcare? Why should my tax dollars fund others’ childcare when I paid for mine. We are NOT a socialist country. If you want a socialist country then move to one.” Others turned the criticism back on Democrats. “Under Biden you had the majority in the house and senate — what did you spend our money on?” one commenter asked. Some responses focused squarely on the defense budget angle. “He literally said we have to spend all our money on defense. I guess $1 trillion per year isn’t enough,” one user wrote. Another kept it brief: “It’s a joke — healthcare should have been free long time ago.” Related: Rhode Island Mayor Brett Smiley Faces Backlash Over Removal of Iryna Zarutska Mural: ‘Art Shouldn’t Be Silenced’ The clip stands out because Trump didn’t hide behind technical jargon or paperwork. He just told everyone, straight up, that the military comes first, even if that means less money for childcare or healthcare for seniors and people struggling to get by. That’s a sharp turn from what he said earlier in the year, and a lot of folks, including the Rhode Island congressman, saw it as him backtracking instead of shifting gears. With tensions in Iran dragging on and the bills piling up, people feel the tug-of-war between spending on the military and cutting domestic programs. This moment just made that tradeoff painfully clear. The post Rhode Island Congressman Slams Trump For Admitting Tax Payer Money Is Being Spent on Wars, Not Daycare appeared first on The Nerd Stash.
Rhode Island Congressman Slams Trump For Admitting Tax Payer Money Is Being Spent on Wars, Not Daycare
President Donald Trump stirred up a storm during the White House Easter lunch when he laid out his reasons for cutting federal funding for daycare. He didn’t mince words: “We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare.” That comment spread across social media, especially after Rhode Island Congressman Seth Magaziner posted the clip and weighed in on X. Now, users are arguing about how the government spends its money, whether it puts military needs above basic services, and what it really owes to everyday Americans. So he admits that he is spending our tax money on endless wars instead of childcare, Medicare, and Medicaid. It doesn’t have to be this way. https://t.co/qcdxCFOJQA — Congressman Seth Magaziner (@Rep_Magaziner) April 2, 2026 The comments came at a private Easter lunch in the White House East Room, with over 100 faith leaders in the room. The White House actually put the video on YouTube at first, then made it private. However, Newsweek and plenty of people on social media had already shared it. Rep. Magaziner from Rhode Island’s 2nd District, who has been outspoken against Medicaid cuts, posted the clip with a sharp message: “So he admits that he’s using our tax money for endless wars instead of childcare, Medicare, and Medicaid. It doesn’t have to be this way.” Meanwhile, Trump told the room he had given OMB Director Russell Vought a clear order: “Don’t send any money for daycare because the United States can’t take care of daycare.” He kept going: “We can’t take care of daycare. We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people. We’re fighting wars. You got to let a state take care of daycare, and they should pay for it, too. They’ll have to raise their taxes, but they should pay for it.” Internet Reacts to Rhode Island Congressman’s Comments About Trump Reactions were divided sharply along political lines. Some commenters pushed back on the framing of federal involvement in childcare altogether. “I understand that many think the federal government should stick its nose in everything. But there is absolutely no reason for the federal government to be involved in daycare,” one person wrote. Another took a harder line: “Childcare? Why should my tax dollars fund others’ childcare when I paid for mine. We are NOT a socialist country. If you want a socialist country then move to one.” Others turned the criticism back on Democrats. “Under Biden you had the majority in the house and senate — what did you spend our money on?” one commenter asked. Some responses focused squarely on the defense budget angle. “He literally said we have to spend all our money on defense. I guess $1 trillion per year isn’t enough,” one user wrote. Another kept it brief: “It’s a joke — healthcare should have been free long time ago.” Related: Rhode Island Mayor Brett Smiley Faces Backlash Over Removal of Iryna Zarutska Mural: ‘Art Shouldn’t Be Silenced’ The clip stands out because Trump didn’t hide behind technical jargon or paperwork. He just told everyone, straight up, that the military comes first, even if that means less money for childcare or healthcare for seniors and people struggling to get by. That’s a sharp turn from what he said earlier in the year, and a lot of folks, including the Rhode Island congressman, saw it as him backtracking instead of shifting gears. With tensions in Iran dragging on and the bills piling up, people feel the tug-of-war between spending on the military and cutting domestic programs. This moment just made that tradeoff painfully clear. The post Rhode Island Congressman Slams Trump For Admitting Tax Payer Money Is Being Spent on Wars, Not Daycare appeared first on The Nerd Stash.