Skip to main content

Search

Search people, articles, bills, and more

hmaryles.substack.com logo

hmaryles.substack.com

NewsletterProvenance not yet reviewedIndividual writer

1 story credited to hmaryles.substack.com

Latest story Apr 12, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026 · on substack.com

Scores for hmaryles.substack.com

Credibility

An individual writer or an online community, not a news organization, so the newsroom rating does not apply.

How this is measured

Political lean

An individual writer or an online community, not a news organization, so the newsroom rating does not apply.

How this is measured

Originality

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Stories credited to hmaryles.substack.com, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

  • Stories from hmaryles.substack.com
  • Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
MonthStoriesAll outlets
April 202613,361
May 20260none collected
June 20260none collected
July 20260none collected
August 202601 (collection gap)
September 202601,320

Top topics

Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

  • Ethics/Corruption1

    100% of 1 stories · 58% across all outlets

  • Foreign Policy1

    100% of 1 stories · 29% across all outlets

  • Voting Rights1

    100% of 1 stories · 19% across all outlets

The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 1 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 1 story–official pair, from 1 story.

  • Independent100% · 1 pair

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.

  1. 1Bernard SandersI1 story · 100%

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not hmaryles.substack.com’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.

Good Look
0 (0%)
Mixed
0 (0%)
Informational
0 (0%)
Bad Look
1 (100%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from hmaryles.substack.com

1

Jewish Contributors to Antisemitism

Jewish led anti AIPAC rally in NYC Antisemitism is up in this country. No question about it. But what makes its current incarnation different from antisemitism of the past is that, in some ways, there are Jews contributing to it. Though not in the way one might think. In the past, it didn’t help matters when a few of our people - some of whom were outwardly very devout - were caught with their hands in the cookie jar. Cases of government fraud by seemingly devout Orthodox Jews have surely contributed to antisemitism, making it easier for antisemites to generalize a supposed propensity for fraud to all Jews, especially the most devout among us. While incidents of that kind of fraud seem to have decreased, antisemitism has nevertheless increased. Much of that increase is due to closet antisemites who have long lived among us but were relatively quiet about expressing their views. Since the war in Gaza and accusations of genocide, however, they seem to feel they have been given ‘permission’ to voice their true feelings. Often disguised as anti-Zionist or anti-Israel sentiment. The problem is that a growing number of Jews are now saying many of the same things. Accusations of genocide are no longer uncommon. These are often framed as criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rather than of Israel as a whole. But that framing ignores the reality that, with few exceptions on Israel’s far left, Netanyahu’s conduct of the war has been broadly supported in the Israeli Knesset. That distinction is therefore invalid. Making matters worse, prominent self-identifying Jews in high office have joined the chorus of Israel-bashing by proxy - using AIPAC as their primary target. AIPAC is a lobbying group that advocates support for Israel regardless of which political party is in power, both in the United States and in Israel. Yet it has now become increasingly toxic within the Democratic Party. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin have repudiated their connections to the group. So has Daniel Biss, the heir apparent to the congressional seat in my district, whose grandparents were Holocaust survivors. Then there is J Street, a group of progressive Jews that has become one of the most vocal critics of Israel. (In my view, its policies are both anti-Jewish and harmful to Israel. But I digress.) And we cannot ignore Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, perhaps the quintessential Jewish anti-Zionist, at least in terms of any kind of Zionism rooted in Judaism. Meanwhile, mainstream left-leaning institutions like the DNC are piling on. For example, a recent DNC resolution singled out AIPAC for condemnation over so-called ‘dark money’ in elections. Although the resolution was ultimately defeated, the fact that it was seriously considered adds fuel to the fire. So do accusations of Israeli genocide made by serious candidates for high office in several states—for example, Analilia Mejia, who is running in New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District and has been endorsed by her former rival as well as by J Street. Academia, heavily influenced by left-wing progressives, has also turned sharply against Israel—especially as Israel has moved away from its socialist beginnings toward a free-market economy, a shift many progressives view as a grave sin. Many academics now align themselves closely with Palestinians and fully accept their grievances against Israel and US support for her. Nor should we overlook Hollywood elites, whose Judaism is often defined primarily through progressive values and who frequently express strong anti-Zionist views, reserving most of their compassion for the Palestinian cause. With all of these forces at work in our culture, it should come as no surprise that antisemitism has increased in what feels like exponential terms. On the plus side, Tucker Carlson appears to have lost considerable momentum in his anti-Israel crusade. While he was once a powerful voice on the right - perhaps the most influential during his time at Fox - he now seems largely sidelined. Mainstream conservative Republicans, for the most part, still view Israel and the Jewish people in a generally positive light. The broader concern is political. Because of the war with Iran and its impact on the U.S. economy, the prospect of a Democratic return to power in the House is strong, and the Senate could be at risk as well. That would not bode well for Israel. It could cement an anti-Israel bias in Congress for the first time in decades—further fueling antisemitic trends among too many Americans. I’m not sure what can be done about all this, but I am not feeling very confident about what might happen in the next congressional election. I can only hope that the war concludes with a satisfactory outcome for all involved, restoring the American economy to where it was before. That, in turn, might give supporters of Israel a chance to maintain their majority in both houses. I hope and pray that happens. Emes Ve-Emunah is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Apr 12, 202620 votes