Skip to main content

Search

Search people, articles, bills, and more

Fight for the Future logo

Fight for the Future

fightforthefuture.org

Provenance not yet reviewed

1 story credited to Fight for the Future

Latest story Apr 14, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026

Scores for Fight for the Future

Credibility

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Political lean

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Originality

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured

Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Stories credited to Fight for the Future, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

  • Stories from Fight for the Future
  • Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
MonthStoriesAll outlets
April 202612,921
May 20260none collected
June 20260none collected
July 20260none collected
August 202601 (collection gap)
September 202601,320

Top topics

Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

  • Defense/Military1

    100% of 1 stories · 25% across all outlets

  • Ethics/Corruption1

    100% of 1 stories · 58% across all outlets

  • Technology/Privacy1

    100% of 1 stories · 10% across all outlets

The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 1 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 1 story–official pair, from 1 story.

  • Democrat100% · 1 pair

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.

  1. 1Gregory MeeksD1 story · 100%

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not Fight for the Future’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.

Good Look
0 (0%)
Mixed
0 (0%)
Informational
0 (0%)
Bad Look
1 (100%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from fightforthefuture.org

1

Statement: Rep. Meeks voting for a clean FISA reauthorization is disrespectful & dangerous

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 14, 2026 Email: press@fightforthefuture.org Phone: 978-852-6457 As Rep. Meeks (D-NY) stands up for a clean FISA reauthorization to preserve the data broker loophole that allows warrantless spying on everyone in the US’s digital communications, Fight for the Future, STOP Spying NYC, and Access Now have issued the following joint statement: “If the heat of the glares aimed at Rep. Meeks right now could melt him, he’d be dripping like a snowman on the pavement in July. No one in Queens wants everybody in the federal government to have total access to the intimate details of their lives with the tap of a mouse. Yet, Rep. Meeks has said as recently as Monday that he wants no restrictions on FISA enabling the build-out of the Trump administration’s blanket panopticon, which the admin is using not only for mass deportations, but also to create lists of enemies. Activists across the country are being added to threat lists based on AI analysis of their social media posts, their movements, what they read, who they follow, and their private communications—lists that may have prompted ICE to shoot one woman five times. Data brokers are selling ICE the facial recognition and home address data to show up the homes of legal observers and intimidate them for engaging in constitutionally protected activity. The data available without a warrant includes our everyday movements: our commute routes, when we are home alone, who we spend time with, when our children get home from school. More, FISA’s Section 702 also allows the government to collect communications between Americans and foreigners located abroad, without requiring a warrant or any due process. It is a total betrayal of the fourth amendment and the dignity of everyday people in this country to treat us all as if we are guilty until Big Brother Trump proves us innocent by watching our every move. And worse—it’s impossible to predict how these troves of records may be weaponized in the future against racial justice activists, trans and queer families, abortion patients and providers, anti-war activists, or anyone who acts out of step with MAGA. It’s supposed to be the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, not the Forever Indiscriminate Surveillance Act. Rep. Meeks’ colleagues are proposing real safeguards to protect people against this indiscriminate government surveillance. Rep. Meeks is not only rejecting these safeguards, he’s convincing his colleagues to give Trump and spy agencies blanket permission to violate the Fourth Amendment. He is not only failing his constituency, he is disrespecting them and putting them in danger. It’s not too late for Rep. Meeks to get on the right side of history.”

Apr 14, 20269 votes