1 story credited to DefenseScoop
Latest story Nov 7, 2025 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for DefenseScoop
Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to DefenseScoop, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from DefenseScoop
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| November 2025 | 1 | 60 |
| December 2025 | 0 | 27 |
| January 2026 | 0 | 87 |
| February 2026 | 0 | 180 |
| March 2026 | 0 | 1,094 |
| April 2026 | 0 | 4,538 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 1,320 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Defense/Military1
100% of 1 stories · 25% across all outlets
- Foreign Policy1
100% of 1 stories · 29% across all outlets
- Technology/Privacy1
100% of 1 stories · 10% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 3 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 3 story–official pairs, from 1 story.
- Democrat33% · 1 pair
- Republican33% · 1 pair
- Party not recorded33% · 1 pair
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not DefenseScoop’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.
- Good Look
- 0 (0%)
- Mixed
- 1 (100%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 0 (0%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from defensescoop.com
3
Congress eyes whole-of-government plan to disrupt growing cooperation between US adversaries
Lawmakers in both congressional chambers are calling for the creation of a new whole-of-government plan to confront emerging national security threats associated with expanding cooperation between China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — and to ultimately help ensure the U.S. is prepared to counter concurrent challenges from multiple adversaries in the years to come. Introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., this week, the Defending International Security by Restricting Unlawful Partnerships and Tactics (DISRUPT) Act lays out a plan for multiple federal agencies to collectively disturb and derail some of the most concerning aspects of that adversarial collaboration. The House version of the DISRUPT Act was co-sponsored by Guam Del. James Moylan, a Republican. Similar legislation was also previously proposed in the Senate by Sens. Chris Coons, D-Del., and David McCormick, R-Pa., and is attached to the draft version of the fiscal 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. “The bill was introduced to demonstrate bipartisan, bicameral support in the House as it continues to move through the NDAA process,” a spokesperson for the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party told DefenseScoop. Experts have warned in recent years that authoritarian regimes in China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are working together more closely on activities to defy the U.S., including via weapons and munitions transfers, sharing other military and dual-use technologies, launching disinformation campaigns, and coordinating operations that could undermine the interests of America and its allies. The nearly 20-page DISRUPT Act spotlights a range of recent partnerships and actions the four nations have pursued with one or more of the others, which lawmakers believe could present risks to U.S. interests. For instance, their mutual efforts increase “the chances of United States conflict or tensions with any one of such adversaries drawing in another, thereby posing a greater risk that the United States will have to contend with simultaneous threats from such adversaries in one or more theaters,” the bill states. If passed, the legislation would require the secretaries of State, Defense, Commerce and the Treasury, as well as the directors of National Intelligence and the CIA, to set up task forces to investigate and address this “adversary alignment.” The bill would also direct the director of National Intelligence to issue a report on the trajectory of the nations’ alignment across the diplomatic, information, military and economic spheres. That report would include an assessment of “the risk of technology transfers dramatically increasing the military capabilities of adversaries of the [U.S.] and the impact on the relative balance of [U.S] and allied capabilities as compared to that of the adversary.” Further, leaders in the specific agencies called out would also be mandated to produce a comprehensive and coordinated government strategy to “disrupt, frustrate, constrain, and prepare for adversary cooperation during the two-year period beginning on the date of the” bill’s enactment. Notably, Congress also wants a “plan for digitizing and updating war-planning tools of the Department of Defense not later than 1 year after the date on which the report is submitted to ensure that United States war planners are better equipped to update and modify war plans in the face of rapidly evolving information on adversary cooperation.” Following its introduction, Krishnamoorthi’s bill was referred to the House Committees on Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, and Intelligence (Permanent Select). The post Congress eyes whole-of-government plan to disrupt growing cooperation between US adversaries appeared first on DefenseScoop.
Congress eyes whole-of-government plan to disrupt growing cooperation between US adversaries
Lawmakers in both congressional chambers are calling for the creation of a new whole-of-government plan to confront emerging national security threats associated with expanding cooperation between China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — and to ultimately help ensure the U.S. is prepared to counter concurrent challenges from multiple adversaries in the years to come. Introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., this week, the Defending International Security by Restricting Unlawful Partnerships and Tactics (DISRUPT) Act lays out a plan for multiple federal agencies to collectively disturb and derail some of the most concerning aspects of that adversarial collaboration. The House version of the DISRUPT Act was co-sponsored by Guam Del. James Moylan, a Republican. Similar legislation was also previously proposed in the Senate by Sens. Chris Coons, D-Del., and David McCormick, R-Pa., and is attached to the draft version of the fiscal 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. “The bill was introduced to demonstrate bipartisan, bicameral support in the House as it continues to move through the NDAA process,” a spokesperson for the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party told DefenseScoop. Experts have warned in recent years that authoritarian regimes in China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are working together more closely on activities to defy the U.S., including via weapons and munitions transfers, sharing other military and dual-use technologies, launching disinformation campaigns, and coordinating operations that could undermine the interests of America and its allies. The nearly 20-page DISRUPT Act spotlights a range of recent partnerships and actions the four nations have pursued with one or more of the others, which lawmakers believe could present risks to U.S. interests. For instance, their mutual efforts increase “the chances of United States conflict or tensions with any one of such adversaries drawing in another, thereby posing a greater risk that the United States will have to contend with simultaneous threats from such adversaries in one or more theaters,” the bill states. If passed, the legislation would require the secretaries of State, Defense, Commerce and the Treasury, as well as the directors of National Intelligence and the CIA, to set up task forces to investigate and address this “adversary alignment.” The bill would also direct the director of National Intelligence to issue a report on the trajectory of the nations’ alignment across the diplomatic, information, military and economic spheres. That report would include an assessment of “the risk of technology transfers dramatically increasing the military capabilities of adversaries of the [U.S.] and the impact on the relative balance of [U.S] and allied capabilities as compared to that of the adversary.” Further, leaders in the specific agencies called out would also be mandated to produce a comprehensive and coordinated government strategy to “disrupt, frustrate, constrain, and prepare for adversary cooperation during the two-year period beginning on the date of the” bill’s enactment. Notably, Congress also wants a “plan for digitizing and updating war-planning tools of the Department of Defense not later than 1 year after the date on which the report is submitted to ensure that United States war planners are better equipped to update and modify war plans in the face of rapidly evolving information on adversary cooperation.” Following its introduction, Krishnamoorthi’s bill was referred to the House Committees on Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, and Intelligence (Permanent Select). The post Congress eyes whole-of-government plan to disrupt growing cooperation between US adversaries appeared first on DefenseScoop.
Congress eyes whole-of-government plan to disrupt growing cooperation between US adversaries
Lawmakers in both congressional chambers are calling for the creation of a new whole-of-government plan to confront emerging national security threats associated with expanding cooperation between China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — and to ultimately help ensure the U.S. is prepared to counter concurrent challenges from multiple adversaries in the years to come. Introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., this week, the Defending International Security by Restricting Unlawful Partnerships and Tactics (DISRUPT) Act lays out a plan for multiple federal agencies to collectively disturb and derail some of the most concerning aspects of that adversarial collaboration. The House version of the DISRUPT Act was co-sponsored by Guam Del. James Moylan, a Republican. Similar legislation was also previously proposed in the Senate by Sens. Chris Coons, D-Del., and David McCormick, R-Pa., and is attached to the draft version of the fiscal 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. “The bill was introduced to demonstrate bipartisan, bicameral support in the House as it continues to move through the NDAA process,” a spokesperson for the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party told DefenseScoop. Experts have warned in recent years that authoritarian regimes in China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are working together more closely on activities to defy the U.S., including via weapons and munitions transfers, sharing other military and dual-use technologies, launching disinformation campaigns, and coordinating operations that could undermine the interests of America and its allies. The nearly 20-page DISRUPT Act spotlights a range of recent partnerships and actions the four nations have pursued with one or more of the others, which lawmakers believe could present risks to U.S. interests. For instance, their mutual efforts increase “the chances of United States conflict or tensions with any one of such adversaries drawing in another, thereby posing a greater risk that the United States will have to contend with simultaneous threats from such adversaries in one or more theaters,” the bill states. If passed, the legislation would require the secretaries of State, Defense, Commerce and the Treasury, as well as the directors of National Intelligence and the CIA, to set up task forces to investigate and address this “adversary alignment.” The bill would also direct the director of National Intelligence to issue a report on the trajectory of the nations’ alignment across the diplomatic, information, military and economic spheres. That report would include an assessment of “the risk of technology transfers dramatically increasing the military capabilities of adversaries of the [U.S.] and the impact on the relative balance of [U.S] and allied capabilities as compared to that of the adversary.” Further, leaders in the specific agencies called out would also be mandated to produce a comprehensive and coordinated government strategy to “disrupt, frustrate, constrain, and prepare for adversary cooperation during the two-year period beginning on the date of the” bill’s enactment. Notably, Congress also wants a “plan for digitizing and updating war-planning tools of the Department of Defense not later than 1 year after the date on which the report is submitted to ensure that United States war planners are better equipped to update and modify war plans in the face of rapidly evolving information on adversary cooperation.” Following its introduction, Krishnamoorthi’s bill was referred to the House Committees on Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, and Intelligence (Permanent Select). The post Congress eyes whole-of-government plan to disrupt growing cooperation between US adversaries appeared first on DefenseScoop.