Skip to main content

Search

Search people, articles, bills, and more

Bad Faith Times logo

Bad Faith Times

badfaithtimes.com

Provenance not yet reviewed

1 story credited to Bad Faith Times

Latest story Apr 7, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026

Scores for Bad Faith Times

Credibility

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Political lean

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Originality

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured

Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Stories credited to Bad Faith Times, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

  • Stories from Bad Faith Times
  • Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
MonthStoriesAll outlets
April 202614,161
May 20260none collected
June 20260none collected
July 20260none collected
August 202601 (collection gap)
September 202601,320

Top topics

Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

  • Ethics/Corruption1

    100% of 1 stories · 58% across all outlets

  • Immigration1

    100% of 1 stories · 13% across all outlets

  • Voting Rights1

    100% of 1 stories · 19% across all outlets

The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 1 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 1 story–official pair, from 1 story.

  • Democrat100% · 1 pair

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.

  1. 1John FettermanD1 story · 100%

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not Bad Faith Times’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.

Good Look
0 (0%)
Mixed
0 (0%)
Informational
0 (0%)
Bad Look
1 (100%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from badfaithtimes.com

1

The Worst Democrat

John Fetterman during his 2022 Senate run, and before his stroke, fooled me. He fooled me good. Fetterman back in 2022, taking on Oprah's Dr. Oz for a U.S. Senate seat, ran a campaign with which I was not familiar. Unlike every other high-profile congressional campaign of my lifetime, Fetterman – who had served as Pennsylvania's lieutenant governor before running for Senate – straight up refused to engage Oz's bad-faith political attacks. Fetterman and his campaign surrogates simply would not bite. In not taking the typical Republican bait on issues like taxes and abortion and guns, Fetterman countered Oz's bad faith with no faith at all. He pointed and laughed and moved on. He mocked and joked both online and offline and left Oz and Republicans furious and flustered. It was a nice change – a decidedly weird campaign that did not reward the right wing's bad faith. It was, I thought, a model for how to run a modern Democratic campaign. We learned again in 2024 – for a time, at least – that weird can work in opposing a radicalized Republican Party that operates (almost) exclusively in the worst possible faith. That's all a distant memory today. Fetterman, maybe or maybe not due to the stroke he suffered in 2022, is the first tried-and-true Trump Democrat, in the tradition of shameful Reagan Democrats who came to prominence in the mid-and-late 80s. Their pledge, like Fetterman's today, was that they would never try to make anything better for anyone, that they would operate exactly like Ronald Reagan – by far the most radically right-wing president in the history of western democracy as of 1980 – but have a D by their name. Though Fetterman still votes with Senate Democrats at an 80 percent clip, he lives to antagonize his liberal colleagues and seems to enjoy his role as a troll. The only time Fetterman doesn't look like a total fucking slob is when he meets Big Daddy at the White House or at the State of the Union. That's a troll move. In 2023, Fetterman voted with Republicans 2 times. In 2024, 0 times. In 2025, 18 times. He is not a working class Joe. His father was in insurance. He has 3 college degrees, in finance, business, and public policy, including one from Harvard. He was also in insurance before politics. He's b.s. — (@progressivebeat.bsky.social) 2026-03-19T14:58:25.605Z I wrote back in January 2025, as Fetterman basked in the glow of Trump's defeat of Kamala Harris, about the senator's attempts to make anti-Trump Americans feel absolutely crazy about the state of the country and their opposition to the nation's first tyrant. "They wanted the candidate who would best protect and project their version of the American way of life," Fetterman said shortly after Trump's 2024 victory. It was as unsubtle a nod to white supremacy as you'll get from an elected Democrat. It's as if Shrek was terminally online, desperate for the approval of his Trump-worshipping father, and suffering from the effects of a massive stroke. Shoutout to the surprisingly woke Connor Lamb, who very much needs to take down Shrek in 2028. Senator John Fetterman’s response to @premthakker.bsky.social when asked about the illegal US strike on an Iranian Naval ship in international waters: “I want to offer condolences to your boss [Mehdi]. I know he’s all broke up about the Ayatollah.” — Zeteo (@zeteo.com) 2026-03-04T23:35:35.220Z This guy sucks. Fetterman's latest troll maneuver was casting the deciding vote to advance the nomination of roided-out former UFC loser Markwayne Mullin to be the next head of Homeland Security after Kristi Noem's facial reconstructions no longer pleased the king. Fetterman voted for Mullin because, in his words, Mullin is still among the only coworkers who will talk to Fetterman. What went unsaid: Advancing Mullin to the full Senate would trigger the libs. And that's what Fetterman lives for today. I got mad online, as I do, about Fetterman siding with Republicans on Mullin's disastrous nomination. That prompted a back and forth with The Editorial Board's John Stoehr, a Bluesky mainstay and an excellent follow on the only legitimate microblogging site. Eventually we did a Q&A on Fetterman, that fascist collaborator, and John (Stoehr, not Fetterman) published it on his site. Check it out and let me know if you, like me, were tricked by Fetterman's working class schtick and his refusal to play by the normal, stale Democratic Party rules during his run for Senate. Follow Denny Carter on BlueSky at @dennycarter.bsky.social.

Apr 7, 202616 votes