Ocregister
Democrats blame the party, each other and themselves in CA-40 June primary shutout
Ramirez argued that the party’s endorsement process did not produce a unified choice in the district.
ElectionsINFORMATIONAL
FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · CA-40 (D)FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · CA-40 (D)
Lisa Ramirez
Lisa Ramirez ran in the June 2, 2026 Democratic primary for California’s 40th district and did not advance.
- Party
- Democrat
- Ran for
- U.S. House · CA-40 (2026)
- Result
- Lost primary (14.0%)
- Raised
- $519K
- LAST RAN
- 2026
- RAISED
- $519K
TAP A TAB FOR ELECTION, MONEY & MORE
Lisa Ramirez at a glance
NET READER RATING
COVERAGE MIX · 1 STORY
Click a row to open that column below.TOP TOPICS
STORIES2026 election: California’s 40th District
Lisa Ramirez’s campaign fundraising and spending
- RAISED · 2025–26 CYCLE
- $519K
- CASH ON HAND
- $0
- SPENT
- $519K
WHERE THE MONEY CAME FROM
- Individuals
- $401K · 77.5%
- PACs
- $12K · 2.2%
- Self-funding
- $105K · 20.3%
AIPAC · 2025–26
AIPAC TRACKER →HOW WE COUNT →TOP DONORS
Ramos, PhillipPhilatron · ENTREPRENUER$7K
Sergi, FrankFrank Sergi · REALTOR$7K
Rael, JacobBroadcom · ENGINEER$7K
Kramer, G. RichardNot Employed · NOT EMPLOYED$5K
Lukoschek, MonicaNot Employed · NOT EMPLOYED$5K
Ramirez, IsabellaNot Employed · NOT EMPLOYED$4K
Parvaneh, AliMadison Law · ATTORNEY$4K
Demott, BrandonIndividual$4K
Penaloza, LorenaCsu · ATTORNEY$4K
West, MichelleRobinson Calcagnie, INC. · ATTORNEY$4K
Totals by donor name from itemized FEC receipts: individuals and committees that gave over $200.CAMPAIGN SPENDING
Other$316K
Advertising$75K
Administrative$28K
Loan-Repayments$20K
Refunds$11K
Coverage
1 STORY · CLICK A COLUMN TO FOCUS IT ·
No stories in this column yet.
No stories in this column yet.
Ocregister · 6 MIN READ
Democrats blame the party, each other and themselves in CA-40 June primary shutout
Ramirez argued that the party’s endorsement process did not produce a unified choice in the district.
ChamberLight is not an official government source. Reader ratings reflect public reception, not editorial judgment.