OPINIONChicago Tribune
Editorial: Tribune endorsements for U.S. Congress in 13th, 14th, 15th, 17th districts
The editorial board endorsed Bowlby, praising her emphasis on agriculture, economic issues and building bridges.
ElectionsINFORMATIONAL
FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · IL-15 (R)FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · IL-15 (R)
Judy Bowlby
Judy Bowlby ran in the March 17, 2026 Republican primary for Illinois’s 15th district and did not advance.
- Party
- Republican
- Ran for
- U.S. House · IL-15 (2026)
- Result
- Lost primary (11.6%)
- Raised
- $38K
- LAST RAN
- 2026
- RAISED
- $38K
TAP A TAB FOR ELECTION, MONEY & MORE
Judy Bowlby at a glance
NET READER RATING
COVERAGE MIX · 1 STORY
Click a row to open that column below.TOP TOPICS
STORIES2026 election: Illinois’s 15th District
Judy Bowlby’s campaign fundraising and spending
- RAISED · 2025–26 CYCLE
- $38K
- CASH ON HAND
- $0
- SPENT
- $38K
- DEBT
- $24K
WHERE THE MONEY CAME FROM
- Individuals
- $14K · 36.9%
- Self-funding
- $24K · 63.1%
AIPAC · 2025–26
AIPAC TRACKER →HOW WE COUNT →TOP DONORS
Simpson, RogerRetired · RETIRED$3K
Dively, JoeFirst Mid Bank & Trust · CEO$1K
Piatt, KathleenRetired · RETIRED$1K
Groniger, JeromeRetired · RETIRED$1K
Donnell, ThomasFarmer · FARMER$1K
Juodis, TonyRetired · RETIRED$1K
Webber, RogerState Of Il · JUDGE$1K
Varner, PatriciaRetired · RETIRED$1K
Todd, JackRetired · RETIRED$1K
Rauschenberger, SteveR-P Consultants · CONSULTANT$1K
Totals by donor name from itemized FEC receipts: individuals and committees that gave over $200.CAMPAIGN SPENDING
Other$28K
Administrative$8K
Materials$1K
Loan-Repayments$12
Coverage
1 STORY · CLICK A COLUMN TO FOCUS IT ·
No story about Bowlby reads as a good look yet.
No story about Bowlby reads as a bad look yet.
OPINIONChicago Tribune · 7 MIN READ
Editorial: Tribune endorsements for U.S. Congress in 13th, 14th, 15th, 17th districts
The editorial board endorsed Bowlby, praising her emphasis on agriculture, economic issues and building bridges.
ChamberLight is not an official government source. Reader ratings reflect public reception, not editorial judgment.