Themorningsun
Three candidates are vying for John Moolenaar's spot, here's what to know
Hill’s profile describes their background and campaign positions, including healthcare and LGBTQ+ rights.
ElectionsINFORMATIONAL
FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · MI-2 (D)FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · MI-2 (D)
Jamie Hill
Jamie Hill ran in the August 4, 2026 Democratic primary for Michigan’s 2nd district and did not advance.
- Party
- Democrat
- Ran for
- U.S. House · MI-2 (2026)
- Result
- Lost primary (42.3%)
- Raised
- $16K
- LAST RAN
- 2026
- RAISED
- $16K
TAP A TAB FOR ELECTION, MONEY & MORE
Jamie Hill at a glance
NET READER RATING
COVERAGE MIX · 1 STORY
Click a row to open that column below.TOP TOPICS
STORIES2026 election: Michigan’s 2nd District
THE 2026 RACE
John R. MoolenaarREPIncumbent · $1.7M raised
Benjamin AmbroseDEM$85K raised
Charlotte MagoonGREEN
Richard SillsNATURAL LAW
Jamie Hill’s campaign fundraising and spending
- RAISED · 2025–26 CYCLE
- $16K
- CASH ON HAND
- $7K
- SPENT
- $8K
- DEBT
- $4K
WHERE THE MONEY CAME FROM
- Individuals
- $10K · 62.9%
- Self-funding
- $6K · 37.1%
AIPAC · 2025–26
AIPAC TRACKER →HOW WE COUNT →TOP DONORS
A Page, PatriciaNot Employed · NOT EMPLOYED$2K
Opal, LizPace · AID$1K
Anonymous Cash Donations, N/AN/A · N/A$1K
Ortiz, MaryIndividual$1K
Cash Donations, AnonymousUnknown · UNKNOWN$440
Opal, StanN/A · RETIRED$400
Oudsema, EmilyState Of Michigan · CPS WORKER$300
Fiebig, KathyRetired · RETIRED$300
Forbes, MarionIndividual$225
Reaser, JodiNot Employed · NOT EMPLOYED$200
Totals by donor name from itemized FEC receipts: individuals and committees that gave over $200.CAMPAIGN SPENDING
Other$6K
Advertising$1K
Coverage
1 STORY · CLICK A COLUMN TO FOCUS IT ·
No stories in this column yet.
No stories in this column yet.
Themorningsun · 4 MIN READ
Three candidates are vying for John Moolenaar's spot, here's what to know
Hill’s profile describes their background and campaign positions, including healthcare and LGBTQ+ rights.
ChamberLight is not an official government source. Reader ratings reflect public reception, not editorial judgment.