FORMER U.S. REPRESENTATIVE (D-RI) · 2011–2023FORMER U.S. REPRESENTATIVE (D-RI) · 2011–2023
David N. Cicilline
David N. Cicilline represented Rhode Island’s 1st district in the U.S. House from 2011 to 2023.
Cicilline served in the Rhode Island House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003 and as mayor of Providence from 2003 to 2011.
Cicilline earned a bachelor’s degree from Brown University in 1983 and a Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center in 1986. A lawyer, Cicilline served in the Rhode Island House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003, as mayor of Providence from 2003 to 2011, and in the U.S. House from 2011 to 2023.Source: Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0
- In House
- 2011–2023
- Age
- 65
- IN HOUSE
- 2011–23
- AGE
- 65
TAP A TAB FOR CAREER, ELECTION, MONEY & MORE
David N. Cicilline at a glance
NET READER RATING
COVERAGE
No stories about David N. Cicilline yet.LATEST ACTIVITY
No recent activity on record.David N. Cicilline’s career and background
PUBLIC SERVICE · 1995 – 2023
OFFICE
Rhode Island House of Representatives 1995–03Mayor 2003–11U.S. House · RI-1 2011–23
- 2011 – 23U.S. House · RI-1
- 2003 – 11Mayor
- 1995 – 03Rhode Island House of Representatives
- BORN
- July 15, 1961 · Providence, Rhode Island
- EDUCATION
- Bachelor of Arts, Brown University, 1983 · Juris Doctor, Georgetown University Law Center, 1986
2022 election: Rhode Island’s 1st District
LAST RESULT · NOV 2020 GENERAL
D+55.4David N. CicillineDEM71.3%
Frederick WysockiIND15.9%
THE 2022 RACE
Allen WatersREP
PAST RESULTS
2022U.S. House · RI-164.2%
2020U.S. House · RI-171.3%
2018U.S. House · RI-166.9%
RESULTS SINCE 20182022 RI-1 HOUSE RACE →David N. Cicilline’s campaign fundraising and spending
- RAISED · 2025–26 CYCLE
- $8K
- CASH ON HAND
- $452K
- SPENT
- $48K
AIPAC · 2025–26
AIPAC TRACKER →HOW WE COUNT →TOP DONORS
No itemized donors on record for this cycle.CAMPAIGN SPENDING
Other$48K
Contributions$13K
Coverage
NO STORIES YET
COVERAGENo stories about David N. Cicilline yet.
ChamberLight is not an official government source. Reader ratings reflect public reception, not editorial judgment.