MOST RATEDPolitico
A Trump-backed Arizona candidate faces tough House primary after sex scandals
Keenan is spending heavily on advertising that highlights allegations against his primary opponent, Mark Lamb.
Ethics50%
FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · AZ-5 (R)FORMER CANDIDATE · 2026 · U.S. HOUSE · AZ-5 (R)
Daniel Keenan
Daniel Keenan ran in the July 21, 2026 Republican primary for Arizona’s 5th district and did not advance.
- Party
- Republican
- Ran for
- U.S. House · AZ-5 (2026)
- Result
- Lost primary (41.3%)
- Raised
- $1.9M
- LAST RAN
- 2026
- RAISED
- $1.9M
TAP A TAB FOR ELECTION, MONEY & MORE
Daniel Keenan at a glance
NET READER RATING
COVERAGE MIX · 1 STORY
Click a row to open that column below.SENTIMENT BY TOPIC
NET2026 election: Arizona’s 5th District
Daniel Keenan’s campaign fundraising and spending
- RAISED · 2025–26 CYCLE
- $1.9M
- CASH ON HAND
- $47K
- SPENT
- $1.8M
- DEBT
- $1.7M
WHERE THE MONEY CAME FROM
- Individuals
- $30K · 1.8%
- PACs
- $9K · 0.5%
- Self-funding
- $1.7M · 97.7%
AIPAC · 2025–26
AIPAC TRACKER →HOW WE COUNT →TOP DONORS
Keenan, JesseSemper Fi · OWNER$5K
Wood, CherylBaron Fuels INC · OWNER$4K
Keenan, LeslieHome Smart Realty · REALTOR$3K
Best, SteveRetired · RETIRED$1K
Brandon, JohnBrandon House Foundation · PRINCIPAL OFFICER$1K
Brandon, RachaelBrandon House Foundation · DIRECTOR$1K
Lozon, DorceSelf Employed · MACHINEST$1K
Drosos, DeanSelf · ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER$1K
Draayer, AndrewAndrew The Homebuyer · ANDREW THE HOMEBUYER$1K
Slade, MicahCapital Concrete · CONSTRUCTION$1K
Totals by donor name from itemized FEC receipts: individuals and committees that gave over $200.CAMPAIGN SPENDING
Other$1.8M
Advertising$52K
Transfers$391
Coverage
1 STORY · CLICK A COLUMN TO FOCUS IT ·
No stories in this column yet.
MOST RATEDNo stories in this column yet.
MOST RATEDPolitico · 7 MIN READ
A Trump-backed Arizona candidate faces tough House primary after sex scandals
Keenan is spending heavily on advertising that highlights allegations against his primary opponent, Mark Lamb.
ChamberLight is not an official government source. Reader ratings reflect public reception, not editorial judgment.