FORMER U.S. REPRESENTATIVE (R-MO) · 2009–2025FORMER U.S. REPRESENTATIVE (R-MO) · 2009–2025
Blaine Luetkemeyer
Blaine Luetkemeyer represented Missouri in the U.S. House from 2009 to 2025.
Luetkemeyer served in the Missouri House of Representatives from 1999 to 2005 before entering the U.S. House in 2009.
Luetkemeyer earned a Bachelor of Arts from Lincoln University in 1974. Luetkemeyer served in the Missouri House of Representatives from 1999 to 2005, then represented Missouri in the U.S. House from 2009 to 2025, first in the 9th district and later in the 3rd district.Source: Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0
- In House
- 2009–2025
- Age
- 74
- IN HOUSE
- 2009–25
- AGE
- 74
TAP A TAB FOR CAREER, ELECTION, MONEY & MORE
Blaine Luetkemeyer at a glance
NET READER RATING
COVERAGE
No stories about Blaine Luetkemeyer yet.LATEST ACTIVITY
No recent activity on record.Blaine Luetkemeyer’s career and background
PUBLIC SERVICE · 1999 – 2025
OFFICE
Missouri House of Representatives 1999–05U.S. House · MO-3/9 2009–25
- 2009 – 25U.S. House · MO-3/9
- 1999 – 05Missouri House of Representatives
- BORN
- May 7, 1952 · Jefferson City, Missouri
- EDUCATION
- Bachelor of Arts, Lincoln University, 1974
2022 election: Missouri’s 3rd District
THE 2022 RACE
Bethany MannDEM$27K raised
PAST RESULTS
2022U.S. House · MO-365.1%
2020U.S. House · MO-369.4%
2018U.S. House · MO-365.1%
RESULTS SINCE 20182022 MO-3 HOUSE RACE →Blaine Luetkemeyer’s campaign fundraising and spending
- RAISED · 2023–24 CYCLE
- —
AIPAC · 2023–24
AIPAC TRACKER →HOW WE COUNT →- THROUGH AIPAC PAC
- $8K
- Earmarked gifts · 2 donors
- $3K
- From the PAC itself
- $5K
AIPAC-BACKED SUPER PAC (UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT)
- SUPPORTING
- —
- OPPOSING
- —
SINCE DEC 2021 $18K through AIPAC PAC
Earmarked gifts are part of Individuals above. AIPAC PAC filings through Aug 31.DONORS AND OUTSIDE SPENDING
No itemized donors or outside spending are on record for this cycle.Coverage
NO STORIES YET
COVERAGENo stories about Blaine Luetkemeyer yet.
ChamberLight is not an official government source. Reader ratings reflect public reception, not editorial judgment.