Watch
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE VIDEO · 3:31:53Pick a point on the bar to jump thereTap the bar to jump3:31:53
Why this hearing
On the record: 4 witnesses, all from business and trade groups.
Real oversight or theater?
Did this hearing get real answers, or was it mostly speeches?
NO RATINGS YET
What each witness said
The main points of each witness’s written statement.
Terranova Ranch, Inc.Vice President and General Manager · Don Cameron
- Argues a full range of crop protection tools, including pesticides, is essential to reliably produce appealing, high-quality fresh food.
- Asks Congress to increase USDA research and IR-4 funding, revive biopesticide grants, and support EPA staffing and coordination with California regulators.
“a full range of innovative crop protection tools, including pesticides, is essential to ensure the reliable production of appealing, high-quality fresh produce.”
Council of Producers and Distributors of Agrotechnology (CPDA)Chairman · Terry Abbott
- Reports more than half a billion dollars in member products are awaiting EPA review and says delays limit access to crop-protection tools.
- Asks Congress to fund OPP at PRIA V's $166 million annual minimum and update NRCS standards to recognize adjuvant technologies.
“CPDA strongly supports full funding for the Office of Pesticide Programs, including the $166 million annual minimum authorized under PRIA V.”
NutrienDirector of Agronomy · Dr. Karl Wyant
- Describes plant biostimulants as tools that can improve nutrient uptake, stress tolerance, and plant and soil health.
- Asks Congress to support the Plant Biostimulant Act of 2025 and include it in the Farm Bill for a clear federal framework.
“I strongly urge the Committee to support the Plant Biostimulant Act of 2025 and include it in the Farm Bill.”
Agragene, Inc.Chief Executive Officer · Bryan Witherbee
- Asks Congress to update federal authority and create risk-proportionate pathways, coordinated reviews, and field validation for gene-edited pest controls.
- Describes pgSIT as producing healthy, competitive sterile males that suppress target pests without harming non-target species or leaving residues.
“When released into the environment, they mate with wild females, leading to population suppression without harming non-target species or leaving behind any residues.”
- Argues a full range of crop protection tools, including pesticides, is essential to reliably produce appealing, high-quality fresh food.
- Asks Congress to increase USDA research and IR-4 funding, revive biopesticide grants, and support EPA staffing and coordination with California regulators.
“a full range of innovative crop protection tools, including pesticides, is essential to ensure the reliable production of appealing, high-quality fresh produce.”
- Reports more than half a billion dollars in member products are awaiting EPA review and says delays limit access to crop-protection tools.
- Asks Congress to fund OPP at PRIA V's $166 million annual minimum and update NRCS standards to recognize adjuvant technologies.
“CPDA strongly supports full funding for the Office of Pesticide Programs, including the $166 million annual minimum authorized under PRIA V.”
- Describes plant biostimulants as tools that can improve nutrient uptake, stress tolerance, and plant and soil health.
- Asks Congress to support the Plant Biostimulant Act of 2025 and include it in the Farm Bill for a clear federal framework.
“I strongly urge the Committee to support the Plant Biostimulant Act of 2025 and include it in the Farm Bill.”
- Asks Congress to update federal authority and create risk-proportionate pathways, coordinated reviews, and field validation for gene-edited pest controls.
- Describes pgSIT as producing healthy, competitive sterile males that suppress target pests without harming non-target species or leaving residues.
“When released into the environment, they mate with wild females, leading to population suppression without harming non-target species or leaving behind any residues.”
Who asked what
We haven’t logged who asked questions at this hearing yet.
Question logs come from the committee’s official video.
The committee
54 members · 29 Republicans, 25 Democrats
- Glenn ThompsonR-PA-15 · CHAIR
- Austin ScottR-GA-8 · VICE CHAIR
- Don BaconR-NE-2
- James R. BairdR-IN-4
- Mike BostR-IL-12
- Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr.R-PA-8
- Kat CammackR-FL-3
- Rick CrawfordR-AR-1
- Monica De La CruzR-TX-15
- Scott DesJarlaisR-TN-4
- Randy FeenstraR-IA-4
- Brad FinstadR-MN-1
- Mark HarrisR-NC-8
- Ronny JacksonR-TX-13
- Dusty JohnsonR-SD-AL
- Trent KellyR-MS-1
- Frank D. LucasR-OK-3
- Tracey MannR-KS-1
- Mark B. MessmerR-IN-8
- Mary E. MillerR-IL-15
- Barry MooreR-AL-1
- Dan NewhouseR-WA-4
- Zachary NunnR-IA-3
- Derrick Van OrdenR-WI-3
- John W. RoseR-TN-6
- David RouzerR-NC-7
- David J. TaylorR-OH-2
- David G. ValadaoR-CA-22
- Tony WiedR-WI-8
- Angie CraigD-MN-2 · RANKING
- Alma S. AdamsD-NC-12
- Shontel M. BrownD-OH-11
- Nikki BudzinskiD-IL-13
- Salud O. CarbajalD-CA-24
- Jim CostaD-CA-21
- Sharice DavidsD-KS-3
- Donald G. DavisD-NC-1
- April McClain DelaneyD-MD-6
- Shomari FiguresD-AL-2
- Adam GrayD-CA-13
- Jahana HayesD-CT-5
- Jonathan L. JacksonD-IL-1
- John W. MannionD-NY-22
- Jim McGovernD-MA-2
- Chellie PingreeD-ME-1
- Josh RileyD-NY-19
- Kristen McDonald RivetD-MI-8
- Andrea SalinasD-OR-6
- David ScottD-GA-13
- Eric SorensenD-IL-17
- Shri ThanedarD-MI-13
- Jill N. TokudaD-HI-2
- Gabe VasquezD-NM-2
- Eugene Simon VindmanD-VA-7
Witnesses
- Don CameronVice President and General Manager, Terranova Ranch, Inc.WITNESS TYPENon-governmentalTHIS CONGRESSFirst appearance
- Terry AbbottChairman, Council of Producers and Distributors of Agrotechnology (CPDA)WITNESS TYPENon-governmentalTHIS CONGRESSFirst appearance
- Dr. Karl WyantDirector of Agronomy, NutrienWITNESS TYPENon-governmentalTHIS CONGRESSFirst appearance
- Bryan WitherbeeChief Executive Officer, Agragene, Inc.WITNESS TYPENon-governmentalTHIS CONGRESSFirst appearance
In the news
No news coverage of this hearing yet.
Timeline & documents
- Hearing noticed (done)
- Held (done)JUL 22, 2025 · 10:00 AM – 1:48 PM
- Video posted (done)JUL 22, 2025 · 1:48 PM
- Written testimony posted (done)JUL 22, 2025 · 9:07 AM
- Questions for the record (not yet)NOT POSTED YET
- Printed transcript (not yet)USUALLY ABOUT 5 MONTHS AFTER THE HEARING
- Written testimony (4)PAGE (opens the committee’s file)
- Statements for the recordPDF (opens the committee’s file)
- Questions for the recordPENDING
- TranscriptPDF (opens the committee’s file)
- Printed transcriptPENDING
Written follow-up questions from members, answered after the hearing. aren’t posted yet. The printed transcript usually comes out about 5 months after the hearing (of hearings printed so far).