Search people, articles, bills, and more
This bill requires the U.S. military to stop any fighting against Iran that hasn't been officially approved by Congress, while still allowing troops to defend themselves and help allies stop incoming missiles.AI-written
Orders the President to stop unauthorized military action against Iran while preserving the right to self-defense and helping allies intercept incoming attacks.
The U.S. Constitution splits the power of war: the President is the Commander in Chief, but only Congress can 'declare war.' This bill is an attempt by Congress to take back that power after years of what some lawmakers see as 'executive overreach' in the Middle East. If this becomes law, it forces a public debate and a vote before the U.S. can enter a full-scale conflict with Iran.
Without this bill, a President could potentially engage in long-term fighting against Iran by calling it a 'defensive action' or 'limited strike' without ever getting a formal okay from the people's representatives. This matters to anyone who worries about the U.S. being drawn into another major war without a clear plan or public support.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
This bill requires the U.S. military to stop any fighting against Iran that hasn't been officially approved by Congress, while still allowing troops to defend themselves and help allies stop incoming missiles.AI-written
Orders the President to stop unauthorized military action against Iran while preserving the right to self-defense and helping allies intercept incoming attacks.
The U.S. Constitution splits the power of war: the President is the Commander in Chief, but only Congress can 'declare war.' This bill is an attempt by Congress to take back that power after years of what some lawmakers see as 'executive overreach' in the Middle East. If this becomes law, it forces a public debate and a vote before the U.S. can enter a full-scale conflict with Iran.
Without this bill, a President could potentially engage in long-term fighting against Iran by calling it a 'defensive action' or 'limited strike' without ever getting a formal okay from the people's representatives. This matters to anyone who worries about the U.S. being drawn into another major war without a clear plan or public support.
On the Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 163
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Re...
A joint resolution to direct removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republ...