Skip to main content
LAST ACTION SEP 24, 2026  UPDATED OCT 7
S. 5551SENATE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119TH

Critical Mineral Executive Coordination Act of 2026

Requires supply-chain training for certain Foreign Service Economic Officers and recommends a White House critical-minerals coordinator.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the Senate Foreign Relations Committee since Sept. 24, 2026, 14 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROSEP 24, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. SENATESENATE—
  4. HOUSEHOUSE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 7 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

Critical minerals and energy supplies are important to industries, technology and national security, and diplomats may work on issues involving those supply chains. The bill would require certain Foreign Service Economic Officers to take supply-chain and critical-mineral training before specified assignments. It also says there should be a White House advisor to coordinate critical-mineral and supply-chain policy.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 4 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN SENATE
  1. Require supply-chain coursework

    The Secretary of State would create a program on global supply chains and strategic competition. It would be mandatory for entry-level Foreign Service Officers identified as Economic Officers by the end of their second Department tour, and for Economic Officers before deployment to an overseas mission billet focused mainly on critical minerals or energy.

  2. Add training for critical-mineral posts

    Economic Officers would have to complete specialized critical-mineral training before deployment to U.S. presence posts in countries that produce, process, refine or export significant quantities of critical minerals, host strategically important reserves, or play a significant supply-chain role. Officers assigned to posts in countries with heightened supply-disruption risks, resource conflict or strategic resource vulnerabilities would also receive training on risk assessment and mitigation.

  3. Recommend a White House coordinator

    The bill states that there should be a Special Advisor to the President for Critical Minerals and Supply Chains within the National Security Council staff, at a level equivalent to a Deputy National Security Advisor. The advisor would coordinate agencies, recommend policy, and serve as a liaison to Congress, relevant private-sector industries and the State Department’s Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, with deputy advisors and senior directors for domestic and international coordination.

  4. Share training materials across agencies

    The Secretary of State would make materials developed under section 104 available to specified War Department offices and other federal departments and agencies with personnel stationed abroad. The training requirements would end three years after enactment.

THE CONTEXT

The bill cites critical minerals and energy resources as important to national security, economic competitiveness and technological leadership. It says diplomats need knowledge of global supply chains and their vulnerabilities to carry out foreign-policy, commercial and energy-security work.

The bill also points to risks in supply chains, including strategic competition with China and other adversaries. Its training requirements would be temporary, ending three years after enactment.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
BY THE END OF THEIR SECOND DEPARTMENT TOUR
Entry-level Economic Officers complete the academic program
BEFORE DEPLOYMENT
Economic Officers complete training for focused overseas billets
BEFORE DEPLOYMENT
Economic Officers complete specialized training for qualifying posts
3 YEARS AFTER ENACTMENT
Training requirements end
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. ISIntroduced in SenateSEP 24, 20261,114
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedSEP 24, 2026
    SENATE
    SEP 24, 2026
    By Sen. Scott with 5 original cosponsors
    Referred to Foreign Relations
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    Senate committeeSEP 24, 2026
    FOREIGN RELATIONS NOW
    SEP 24, 2026
    In committee for 14 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 14 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. House committee—
    HOUSE
    —
  5. Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026REFERREDRead twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
  2. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026INTRODUCEDSENATEIntroduced in Senate
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE119 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 14, this bill is already older than 3% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

WHO’S BEHIND IT · 5 COSPONSORS

A coalition from 5 states

PARTY MIX
1 REPUBLICAN4 DEMOCRATS

Plus the sponsor, a Republican. The smaller side has 1 member.

COSPONSORS BY STATEEACH BAR IS ONE OF THE STATE’S TWO SENATORS
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
RI
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
DEMOCRATDEMREPUBLICANREPINDEPENDENTINDSPONSORNOT A COSPONSORNONE
PARTY MIX
1 REPUBLICAN4 DEMOCRATS

Plus the sponsor, a Republican. The smaller side has 1 member.

MOMENTUM
SEP 2026 · 5 ORIGINALNOW · 5

Sen. Scott’s record: sponsored 69 bills this Congress. 10 passed the Senate; 1 became law.

EVERY COSPONSOR · IN THE ORDER THEY JOINED5 ACTIVE
READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the Senate, or is signed into law.