Skip to main content
LAST ACTION SEP 24, 2026  UPDATED OCT 3
S. 5544SENATE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119TH

Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act of 2026

Restricts federal biometric surveillance and ties Byrne grants to similar state and local limits.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the Senate Judiciary Committee since Sept. 24, 2026, 14 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROSEP 24, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. SENATESENATE—
  4. HOUSEHOUSE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 4 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

Biometric surveillance uses traits such as faces or voices to identify or track people. The bill would generally bar federal agencies and officials from using these systems unless Congress specifically authorizes it and sets safeguards. It would also condition Byrne grants for state and local governments on adopting substantially similar limits.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 5 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN SENATE
  1. Bar federal biometric surveillance

    Federal agencies and officials could not acquire, possess, access, or use biometric surveillance systems in the United States, or use information from a system operated by someone else, unless an act of Congress specifically authorizes it. The bill also bars federal law-enforcement agencies from using federal funds, including unallocated agency funds, to buy or use these systems.

  2. Require safeguards for authorized uses

    Any congressional authorization would have to specify who may use the system, which biometric it may use, its purposes and prohibited uses, and rules for handling information. It would also have to address accuracy, audits, due process, privacy, free speech and association, and racial, gender, and religious equity.

  3. Condition Byrne grants on similar limits

    States and local governments would be ineligible for Byrne grant program assistance unless they comply with a law or policy substantially similar to the bill’s federal-use prohibition. This condition would apply starting with the first fiscal year that begins after enactment.

  4. Allow lawsuits and penalties

    People aggrieved by a violation could sue the federal government, and state officials could sue on behalf of residents. Courts could award damages, legal fees, costs, or other relief; federal officials who violate the prohibition could also face penalties, subject to due process.

  5. Preserve biometric testing and stricter laws

    The bill would not prevent NIST from testing or researching biometric technologies in commercial use, and it would not override laws that impose stricter limits.

THE CONTEXT

The bill would place limits on government use of technology that can identify people from physical traits or infer information about their activities, associations, emotions, or location. It also makes privacy, accuracy, and protections for speech and association part of the requirements for any congressional authorization.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
FIRST DAY OF THE FIRST FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING AFTER ENACTMENT
Similar state and local limits apply for Byrne grant eligibility
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. ISIntroduced in SenateSEP 24, 20261,096
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedSEP 24, 2026
    SENATE
    SEP 24, 2026
    By Sen. Markey with 3 original cosponsors
    Referred to Judiciary
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    Senate committeeSEP 24, 2026
    JUDICIARY NOW
    SEP 24, 2026
    In committee for 14 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 14 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. House committee—
    HOUSE
    —
  5. Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026REFERREDRead twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026INTRODUCEDSENATEIntroduced in Senate
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE119 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 14, this bill is already older than 3% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

WHO’S BEHIND IT · 3 COSPONSORS

A coalition from 2 states

PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS3 DEMOCRATS

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

COSPONSORS BY STATEEACH BAR IS ONE OF THE STATE’S TWO SENATORS
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
RI
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
DEMOCRATDEMREPUBLICANREPINDEPENDENTINDSPONSORNOT A COSPONSORNONE
PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS3 DEMOCRATS

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

MOMENTUM
SEP 2026 · 3 ORIGINALNOW · 3

Sen. Markey’s record: sponsored 164 bills this Congress. 7 passed the Senate; 0 became law.

EVERY COSPONSOR · IN THE ORDER THEY JOINED3 ACTIVE
IN THE NEWS · 2 STORIES

Coverage at a glance

LEAN DESCRIBES THE OUTLETS, NOT THE BILL
2
STORIES
2
OUTLETS
0 LEFT1 CENTER0 RIGHT

Outlets that covered this bill, by their lean; 1 more are not rated.

STORYSEP 28Lawmakers Reintroduce Bill to Halt Government Use of Facial Recognition2 OUTLETS · L 50% · C 50% · R 0%HOW EACH SIDE TOLD IT →
READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the Senate, or is signed into law.