Skip to main content
LAST ACTION SEP 24, 2026  UPDATED OCT 3
S. 5511SENATE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119TH

Honest Services Fraud Improvement Act

Creates a federal civil lawsuit that qualified citizens could bring against government officials accused of defrauding the public of honest services.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the Senate Judiciary Committee since Sept. 24, 2026, 12 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROSEP 24, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. SENATESENATE—
  4. HOUSEHOUSE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 4 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

Public officials can face allegations that they used their positions dishonestly. The bill would let certain citizens bring federal civil lawsuits against officials accused of defrauding the public of honest services. It sets rules for who can sue, gives the government an initial opportunity to pursue a criminal case, and allows damages and legal costs if an official is found liable.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 5 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN SENATE
  1. Create citizen lawsuits against officials

    A qualified U.S. citizen could sue a government official who takes part in a scheme to defraud citizens of their right to honest services. The case would be brought in federal district court.

  2. Limit who can bring a case

    A plaintiff would have to be a citizen who was a constituent or lived within the official’s jurisdiction during the alleged scheme. The plaintiff could not be an election candidate or act in coordination with, on behalf of, or using funding from a candidate, campaign committee, or candidate’s legal defense fund; the plaintiff could not represent themselves without a lawyer.

  3. Give the government an initial review period

    A complaint would first be filed under seal and shared with the government along with the plaintiff’s evidence. The government could pursue a criminal case; if it does, the civil case would be dismissed. If it declines, the plaintiff would have to provide evidence to the court, which would decide whether the complaint meets the bill’s requirements before it is unsealed and served.

  4. Award damages and legal costs

    A liable official would have to pay the plaintiff compensatory damages, damages equal to three times the value of any bribe solicited or accepted, and reasonable legal expenses and attorney’s fees. Punitive damages would go to the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund.

  5. Bar some claims and remedies

    A case would have to be filed within one year after the plaintiff discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the alleged scheme, and no later than the deadline for filing a criminal charge under the referenced law. A plaintiff could not base a case on an official’s campaign contributions or ask the court to block official action.

THE CONTEXT

The bill’s stated purpose is to let citizens enforce the public’s interest in honest services from government officials. It would create a way for eligible citizens to bring a civil case, with the possibility of damages, while giving the government an opportunity to pursue a criminal case first.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
WITHIN 1 YEAR, AND NO LATER THAN THE CRIMINAL-CHARGE DEADLINE
File after discovering the alleged scheme
AT LEAST 60 DAYS
Keep complaint under seal
WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER RECEIVING THE COMPLAINT AND EVIDENCE; EXTENSIONS FOR GOOD CAUSE
Government may pursue a criminal case
WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER NOTICE
Plaintiff files evidence if government declines prosecution
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. ISIntroduced in SenateSEP 24, 20261,171
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedSEP 24, 2026
    SENATE
    SEP 24, 2026
    By Sen. Kim with 1 original cosponsor
    Referred to Judiciary
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    Senate committeeSEP 24, 2026
    JUDICIARY NOW
    SEP 24, 2026
    In committee for 12 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 12 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. House committee—
    HOUSE
    —
  5. Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026REFERREDRead twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026INTRODUCEDSENATEIntroduced in Senate
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE118 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 12, this bill is already older than 3% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

WHO’S BEHIND IT · 1 COSPONSOR

Support from one state

PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS1 DEMOCRAT

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

COSPONSORS BY STATEEACH BAR IS ONE OF THE STATE’S TWO SENATORS
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
RI
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
DEMOCRATDEMREPUBLICANREPINDEPENDENTINDSPONSORNOT A COSPONSORNONE
PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS1 DEMOCRAT

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

MOMENTUM
SEP 2026 · 1 ORIGINALNOW · 1

Sen. Kim’s record: sponsored 48 bills this Congress. 0 passed the Senate; 0 became law.

EVERY COSPONSOR · IN THE ORDER THEY JOINED1 ACTIVE
READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the Senate, or is signed into law.