Skip to main content
LAST ACTION SEP 23, 2026  UPDATED OCT 2
S. 5493SENATE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119TH

Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act of 2026

Creates a federal AI department, pauses advanced AI development until safety rules are in place, and bans superintelligence and systems with precursor traits.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee since Sept. 23, 2026, 13 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROSEP 23, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. SENATESENATE—
  4. HOUSEHOUSE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 4 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

Advanced AI raises questions about how to keep powerful systems safe and under human control. The bill would create a federal AI department, pause development of advanced systems until safety rules are in place, and prohibit superintelligence and systems with traits that could lead to it. It would also require charters and release approvals, and set penalties for violations.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 6 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN SENATE
  1. Create an AI department

    The bill would establish a Department of Artificial Intelligence, led by a presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed Secretary. An advisory board selected by the Secretary would provide scientific and technical advice.

  2. Pause advanced AI development

    Advanced AI systems would have to stop being trained, modified, or fine-tuned until the Secretary determines the department is fully staffed and has issued safety rules. The rules would cover development plans, ongoing monitoring, safety audits, and approval before public release; unreleased advanced systems could not be deployed during the pause.

  3. Ban superintelligence and precursor systems

    People and organizations could not develop, deploy, acquire, possess, fund, import, or transfer artificial superintelligence or systems with traits that could lead to it. The Secretary would have to pause and isolate identified precursor systems, and render a system inoperative if it is identified as superintelligence or cannot be verified as free of precursor traits.

  4. Require charters and release approval

    Developing or distributing an advanced AI model would require a department charter, and deploying, releasing, importing, or transferring an advanced AI system would require approval. Charter holders would have to give the Secretary access to systems, staff, processes, and facilities for enforcement.

  5. Penalize violations and protect whistleblowers

    A policymaking individual at a chartered organization or a person unaffiliated with one who recklessly violates covered requirements could face a fine and up to 20 years in prison; other employees could be barred from the AI industry for 10 years. Organizations could lose their charters and, after a court upholds a violation finding, have assets and intellectual property forfeited; the bill also bars retaliation against people who report violations.

  6. Coordinate international prevention

    The Secretary, working with the Secretary of State, would pursue international agreements and coordination with allies to prevent artificial superintelligence. U.S. policy would aim to prevent its development globally and could include export controls on AI computing infrastructure.

THE CONTEXT

The bill cites warnings from AI researchers and industry leaders about possible catastrophic harms, including loss of control over advanced systems and risks involving infrastructure or biological weapons. Those are findings and concerns stated by the bill, not established outcomes.

The bill would put prevention of artificial superintelligence at the center of federal AI oversight, including by allowing systems to be paused or rendered inoperative and by restricting development and release. It would also seek international cooperation to prevent such systems from being developed globally.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
WITHIN 24 HOURS
People report discoveries of superintelligence or precursor systems
WITHIN 30 DAYS OF IDENTIFICATION
Secretary renders certain unverified precursor systems inoperative
UNTIL THE SECRETARY MAKES BOTH DETERMINATIONS
Pause on advanced AI development ends when staffing and rules are complete
EACH YEAR
Secretary adjusts the advanced AI computing threshold
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. ISIntroduced in SenateSEP 23, 20262,743
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedSEP 23, 2026
    SENATE
    SEP 23, 2026
    By Sen. Sanders
    Referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    Senate committeeSEP 23, 2026
    COMMERCE, SCIENCE, & TRANSPORTATION NOW
    SEP 23, 2026
    In committee for 13 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 13 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. House committee—
    HOUSE
    —
  5. Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. SEP 232026SEP 23, 2026REFERREDRead twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
  2. SEP 232026SEP 23, 2026INTRODUCEDSENATEIntroduced in Senate
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE118 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 13, this bill is already older than 3% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

IN THE NEWS · 5 STORIES

Coverage at a glance

LEAN DESCRIBES THE OUTLETS, NOT THE BILL
5
STORIES
5
OUTLETS
3 LEFT0 CENTER1 RIGHT

Outlets that covered this bill, by their lean; 1 more are not rated.

EVENTSEP 23Sanders and Casar Introduce Bill to Ban AI Superintelligence50 OUTLETS · L 7% · C 88% · R 5%HOW EACH SIDE TOLD IT →
READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the Senate, or is signed into law.