House BillHR 687Government ethics and transparency, public corruptionMerit Systems Protection Board
MERIT Act of 2025
INTRO JAN 23· LAST ACTION JAN 23
READING
35MIN
COSPONSORS
24
READER REACTIONS0 TOTAL
NO VOTES YET · BE THE FIRST
Introduced only
LEGISLATIVE PROGRESS
STEP 2 / 8
Introduced
In Committee
Reported
Passed House
Passed Senate
Conference
To President
Became Law
WHAT THE BILL DOES
AI-written
This bill matters because it fundamentally changes the employment rules for federal workers, addressing long-standing debates about the ease of removing federal employees for poor performance or misconduct. If passed, it would significantly shift the balance, making it quicker and easier for agencies to take disciplinary actions, including firing.
Voters should care because this could lead to a more responsive and efficient federal workforce by enabling faster removal of underperforming employees. However, it also raises concerns about whether employees will have sufficient due process and protection from arbitrary or unfair decisions, potentially impacting federal employee morale and the government's ability to attract and retain talented individuals in public service. It alters the basic contract between federal employees and their employers.
KEY PROVISIONS
5AI-extracted
PROVISION 01
Eliminates the specific legal process (Chapter 43) for performance-based actions against federal employees, which previously often included a chance to improve performance.
This fundamentally alters how poor performance is addressed, folding it into a broader and faster disciplinary framework rather than a separate system focused on employee development.
PROVISION 02
Establishes strict and short deadlines for adverse actions, requiring agencies to issue a final decision within 15 business days of notifying an employee of a proposed action, with the employee having only 7 business days to respond.
This dramatically speeds up the disciplinary process, significantly reducing the time employees have to prepare a defense and agencies have to make a decision.
PROVISION 03
Removes the requirement for agencies to place an employee on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) before taking adverse actions for poor performance.
This eliminates a common step that provided employees with a formal opportunity to improve their performance before facing disciplinary consequences.
PROVISION 04
Changes pay status for employees whose grade is reduced: their pay is immediately cut to the lower grade, and they cannot be placed on administrative leave or receive pay during an appeal unless they work or use accrued leave.
This removes a financial safety net for employees appealing a demotion, putting immediate financial pressure on them.
PROVISION 05
Shortens the time an employee has to appeal an adverse action to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to not later than 10 business days after the effective date of the action.
This significantly reduces the timeframe for federal employees to seek review from an independent board, making it harder to challenge agency decisions.
This bill matters because it fundamentally changes the employment rules for federal workers, addressing long-standing debates about the ease of removing federal employees for poor performance or misconduct. If passed, it would significantly shift the balance, making it quicker and easier for agencies to take disciplinary actions, including firing.
Voters should care because this could lead to a more responsive and efficient federal workforce by enabling faster removal of underperforming employees. However, it also raises concerns about whether employees will have sufficient due process and protection from arbitrary or unfair decisions, potentially impacting federal employee morale and the government's ability to attract and retain talented individuals in public service. It alters the basic contract between federal employees and their employers.
KEY PROVISIONS
AI-extracted
high
Eliminates the specific legal process (Chapter 43) for performance-based actions against federal employees, which previously often included a chance to improve performance.
This fundamentally alters how poor performance is addressed, folding it into a broader and faster disciplinary framework rather than a separate system focused on employee development.
high
Establishes strict and short deadlines for adverse actions, requiring agencies to issue a final decision within 15 business days of notifying an employee of a proposed action, with the employee having only 7 business days to respond.
This dramatically speeds up the disciplinary process, significantly reducing the time employees have to prepare a defense and agencies have to make a decision.
high
Removes the requirement for agencies to place an employee on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) before taking adverse actions for poor performance.
This eliminates a common step that provided employees with a formal opportunity to improve their performance before facing disciplinary consequences.
med
Changes pay status for employees whose grade is reduced: their pay is immediately cut to the lower grade, and they cannot be placed on administrative leave or receive pay during an appeal unless they work or use accrued leave.
This removes a financial safety net for employees appealing a demotion, putting immediate financial pressure on them.
med
Shortens the time an employee has to appeal an adverse action to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to not later than 10 business days after the effective date of the action.
This significantly reduces the timeframe for federal employees to seek review from an independent board, making it harder to challenge agency decisions.
Employee response period to a notice of proposed adverse action
Not to exceed 15 business days (unless crime suspected)
Aggregate period for agency's written notice, employee's response, and agency's final decision on adverse action
Not later than 15 business days
Agency's issuance of final decision after providing notice to employee
Not later than 10 business days after effective date of action
Employee appeal period to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)
GLOSSARY
AI-written
Adverse Action
A disciplinary action an agency takes against a federal employee, such as removal from job, suspension, reduction in job grade or pay, or furlough.
Title 5, United States Code
The section of U.S. law that outlines the organization and responsibilities of the federal government, including rules for federal employees and their employment.
Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)
An independent federal agency that protects federal merit systems and the rights of federal employees. Employees can appeal certain adverse actions to the MSPB for review.
Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)
A formal plan that a federal agency uses to give an employee an opportunity and specific guidance to improve their performance to an acceptable level before further disciplinary action is taken.
Preponderance of the Evidence
A legal standard of proof that means it is more likely than not (over a 50% chance) that the facts presented are true. It's the standard for the initial decision to take an adverse action.
Substantial Evidence
A legal standard of proof that means there is enough evidence for a reasonable person to conclude that something is true, but it is a lower bar than 'preponderance of the evidence.' It's the standard for agency review of an initial decision.
ACTION TIMELINE
2 EVENTS
JAN 23, 25
Introduced in House
INTROREFERRAL
JAN 23, 25
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.