Search people, articles, bills, and more
This bill matters because it addresses a common frustration for many TV viewers: being assigned to a "local market" that doesn't feel local. For example, a county on a state border might be assigned to a TV market in another state or a distant city within their own state, even if they live much closer to a major city in an adjacent TV market within their own state. This means they miss out on local news, weather, and sports that are truly relevant to their daily lives.
If this bill becomes law, these viewers would gain the power to choose programming that better reflects their community, potentially improving access to critical local information like severe weather alerts or election coverage, and allowing them to follow sports teams they identify with. If it doesn't pass, these subscribers will continue to be restricted to the channels defined by their current, potentially irrelevant, local market assignments.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
This bill matters because it addresses a common frustration for many TV viewers: being assigned to a "local market" that doesn't feel local. For example, a county on a state border might be assigned to a TV market in another state or a distant city within their own state, even if they live much closer to a major city in an adjacent TV market within their own state. This means they miss out on local news, weather, and sports that are truly relevant to their daily lives.
If this bill becomes law, these viewers would gain the power to choose programming that better reflects their community, potentially improving access to critical local information like severe weather alerts or election coverage, and allowing them to follow sports teams they identify with. If it doesn't pass, these subscribers will continue to be restricted to the channels defined by their current, potentially irrelevant, local market assignments.