Search people, articles, bills, and more
Voters should care about this bill because it directly addresses the critical issue of price gouging, which often occurs during natural disasters or emergencies. When communities are recovering from a hurricane, earthquake, or other major event, people are desperate for basic necessities like water, food, fuel, and shelter, as well as repair services. Without protections, some businesses might exploit this desperation by drastically inflating prices, making it harder for people to get what they need to survive and rebuild.
If this bill becomes law, it would provide a clear federal standard against excessive price hikes in disaster zones, giving consumers and enforcement agencies stronger tools to fight exploitation. It aims to ensure that prices remain reasonable during chaotic and vulnerable times, helping communities recover more equitably. If it doesn't become law, the ability to combat price gouging would remain inconsistent, relying on varied state laws, potentially leaving more people vulnerable to unfair practices when they can least afford it.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
Voters should care about this bill because it directly addresses the critical issue of price gouging, which often occurs during natural disasters or emergencies. When communities are recovering from a hurricane, earthquake, or other major event, people are desperate for basic necessities like water, food, fuel, and shelter, as well as repair services. Without protections, some businesses might exploit this desperation by drastically inflating prices, making it harder for people to get what they need to survive and rebuild.
If this bill becomes law, it would provide a clear federal standard against excessive price hikes in disaster zones, giving consumers and enforcement agencies stronger tools to fight exploitation. It aims to ensure that prices remain reasonable during chaotic and vulnerable times, helping communities recover more equitably. If it doesn't become law, the ability to combat price gouging would remain inconsistent, relying on varied state laws, potentially leaving more people vulnerable to unfair practices when they can least afford it.
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
| TYPE | AMOUNT | WHO |
|---|---|---|
| administrative | Treated as a violation of a regulation under the Federal Trade Commission Act regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices; subject to penalties described in subsection (e) of that act (not specified in provided text but generally includes civil penalties/fines) | Any person or business violating the price gouging prohibition |
| civil | Injunctions, enforcement of compliance, damages, restitution, or other compensation on behalf of residents of the State | Any person or business violating the price gouging prohibition (actions brought by State Attorney General) |
| civil | Injunctions, recovery of actual monetary loss; if willful, up to 3 times the actual monetary loss, plus costs and reasonable attorney's fees for prevailing plaintiff | Any person or business violating the price gouging prohibition (actions brought by an injured private person) |