Search people, articles, bills, and more
Voters should care about this bill because it ties local control over immigration policies directly to federal funding for crucial public works. If this bill becomes law, communities that choose not to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement in the specified way could see their federal funding for roads, bridges, and other infrastructure dry up. This could mean fewer jobs, slower economic development, and a decline in the quality of local infrastructure. Conversely, if it doesn't become law, cities and states can continue to set their own policies regarding information sharing with federal immigration authorities without the threat of losing transportation funds.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
Voters should care about this bill because it ties local control over immigration policies directly to federal funding for crucial public works. If this bill becomes law, communities that choose not to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement in the specified way could see their federal funding for roads, bridges, and other infrastructure dry up. This could mean fewer jobs, slower economic development, and a decline in the quality of local infrastructure. Conversely, if it doesn't become law, cities and states can continue to set their own policies regarding information sharing with federal immigration authorities without the threat of losing transportation funds.
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
| TYPE | AMOUNT | WHO |
|---|---|---|
| administrative | Loss of certain federal funds for infrastructure projects, including highway construction. | Political subdivisions of a State that do not comply with the notification requirements. |