Skip to main content
LAST ACTION OCT 1, 2026  UPDATED OCT 7
H.R. 10710HOUSE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119TH

Military Officer Promotion Integrity Act of 2026

Limits when the Defense Secretary can remove promotion-selected officers and gives them notice, a chance to respond, and review.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the House Armed Services Committee since Oct. 1, 2026, 7 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROOCT 1, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. HOUSEHOUSE—
  4. SENATESENATE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 7 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

Military officers selected for promotion can face removal from a promotion recommendation by the Secretary of Defense. The bill would limit removals to specified grounds and require written evidence, advance notice, and a chance for the officer to respond. It would also allow expedited review by a military-records correction board.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 5 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN HOUSE
  1. Limit removal to listed grounds

    The Secretary of Defense could remove an officer chosen for promotion only for specified reasons, such as misconduct, newly discovered material adverse information, loss of a legal qualification, or national security or military necessity. The Secretary would have to identify the ground and supporting facts and evidence in writing, backed by substantial evidence.

  2. Define misconduct and bar certain reasons

    Misconduct would include violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, substantiated adverse findings by an Inspector General or other competent authority, conduct leading to removal from command or administrative separation proceedings, or conduct showing material inability to perform the duties of the grade. A removal decision could not be based on an officer’s participation in or statements about a lawful Defense Department policy or activity that was authorized when it occurred.

  3. Give officers notice and a chance to respond

    Before a final removal decision, the Secretary would have to give the officer written notice of the proposed action and its factual basis, allow the officer a reasonable period to submit a written response, and consider that response. Within 15 days after a final decision, the Secretary would also have to notify the officer and the congressional defense committees in writing.

  4. Allow expedited review and a temporary stay

    An officer could petition a board for correction of military records for expedited review. If the officer petitions within 15 days after receiving notice of the final decision, the removal would be paused until the board finishes; the board would have 180 days after receiving the petition to complete its review.

  5. Require procedures for implementing the law

    The Secretary concerned would have to issue procedures to carry out the bill within 180 days after enactment.

THE CONTEXT

The bill’s findings say promotion boards help keep advancement based on merit and preserve the professionalism and apolitical character of the Armed Forces. They also say that transparency and oversight can protect servicemembers’ rights and public confidence in the promotion system.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER FINAL DETERMINATION
Secretary notifies officer and congressional defense committees
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF FINAL DETERMINATION
Officer petitions for review to pause removal
WITHIN 180 DAYS AFTER RECEIVING PETITION
Correction board completes expedited review
WITHIN 180 DAYS AFTER ENACTMENT
Secretary concerned issues implementing procedures
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. IHIntroduced in HouseOCT 1, 2026929
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedOCT 1, 2026
    HOUSE
    OCT 1, 2026
    By Rep. Strickland with 1 original cosponsor
    Referred to Armed Services
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    House committeeOCT 1, 2026
    ARMED SERVICES NOW
    OCT 1, 2026
    In committee for 7 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 7 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. Senate committee—
    SENATE
    —
  5. Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. OCT 12026OCT 1, 2026REFERREDHOUSEReferred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
  2. OCT 12026OCT 1, 2026INTRODUCEDHOUSEIntroduced in House
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE119 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 7, this bill is already older than 3% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

WHO’S BEHIND IT · 1 COSPONSOR

Support from one state

PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS1 DEMOCRAT

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

COSPONSORS BY STATEEACH BAR IS THE SHARE OF THE STATE’S HOUSE MEMBERS
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
RI
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
PR
DEMOCRATDEMREPUBLICANREPINDEPENDENTINDSPONSORNOT A COSPONSORNONE
PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS1 DEMOCRAT

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

MOMENTUM
OCT 2026 · 1 ORIGINALNOW · 1

Rep. Strickland’s record: sponsored 30 bills this Congress. 1 passed the House; 1 became law.

EVERY COSPONSOR · IN THE ORDER THEY JOINED1 ACTIVE
IN THE NEWS · 1 STORY

Coverage at a glance

LEAN DESCRIBES THE OUTLETS, NOT THE BILL
1
STORY
1
OUTLET

Outlets that covered this bill, by their lean; 1 more are not rated.

READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the House, or is signed into law.