Skip to main content
LAST ACTION SEP 24, 2026  UPDATED OCT 5
H.R. 10539HOUSE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119THENERGY

Integrated Local, Regional, and Interregional Transmission Planning Act of 2026

Requires neighboring transmission-planning regions to coordinate projects and share costs according to customer benefits.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the House Energy and Commerce Committee since Sept. 24, 2026, 14 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROSEP 24, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. HOUSEHOUSE—
  4. SENATESENATE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 4 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

Planning transmission lines across areas can be difficult when local and regional needs are considered separately. The bill would require neighboring transmission-planning regions to coordinate plans for local, regional, and interregional projects. It would also set rules for choosing projects, sharing costs according to benefits, and resolving disputes.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 5 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN HOUSE
  1. Require joint planning across transmission regions

    FERC would have to create rules that bring local, regional, and interregional transmission planning together. The rules would require neighboring planning regions to prepare joint plans and consider near-term, medium-term, and long-term needs, including scenarios 20 years or more into the future.

  2. Set rules for choosing transmission projects

    Joint plans would need a shared method for selecting transmission projects, weighing benefits against costs, and identifying the best transfer capability between neighboring regions. Selection criteria would include reliability, resource adequacy, resilience, consumer benefits, and the public interest.

  3. Tie project costs to customer benefits

    FERC would set cost-allocation principles for projects in joint plans. Customers with no reasonably identifiable benefit could not be required to pay for a project, and costs would have to be allocated in a manner commensurate with benefits.

  4. Require utilities to report replacement plans

    Transmission utilities and owners of covered local transmission facilities would have to give their planning region an estimate of facilities they expect to replace in kind during the next 10 years. Joint plans would identify local, regional, and interregional facilities in each region's service territory.

  5. Set review and dispute procedures

    FERC would review joint plans and could direct a resolution when neighboring regions dispute a material part of a plan. If a region fails to submit a plan, FERC could grant a one-time extension, set a firm submission date with possible civil penalties, or require the region to follow a FERC-approved plan.

THE CONTEXT

The bill's stated purpose is to improve the electric grid through better coordination of transmission planning, with attention to reliability, affordability, and resilience. Its approach would connect planning decisions across neighboring regions and account for local facilities that might also provide wider transmission benefits.

The practical stakes include which projects are selected, how costs are shared among customers, and how disputes between regions are settled. The bill would also treat certain projects selected through approved joint plans as meeting specified requirements for a construction permit.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
6 MONTHS AFTER ENACTMENT
FERC proposes the transmission-planning rule
18 MONTHS AFTER ENACTMENT
FERC issues the final transmission-planning rule
1 YEAR AFTER THE FINAL RULE TAKES EFFECT
Regions submit joint plans
60 DAYS AFTER PROPOSALS ARE SUBMITTED
FERC resolves a submitted planning dispute
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. IHIntroduced in HouseSEP 24, 20262,256
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedSEP 24, 2026
    HOUSE
    SEP 24, 2026
    By Rep. Casten with 4 original cosponsors
    Referred to Energy and Commerce
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    House committeeSEP 24, 2026
    ENERGY & COMMERCE NOW
    SEP 24, 2026
    In committee for 14 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 14 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. Senate committee—
    SENATE
    —
  5. Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026REFERREDHOUSEReferred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  2. SEP 242026SEP 24, 2026INTRODUCEDHOUSEIntroduced in House
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE119 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 14, this bill is already older than 3% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

WHO’S BEHIND IT · 4 COSPONSORS

A coalition from 4 states

PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS4 DEMOCRATS

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

COSPONSORS BY STATEEACH BAR IS THE SHARE OF THE STATE’S HOUSE MEMBERS
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
RI
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
PR
DEMOCRATDEMREPUBLICANREPINDEPENDENTINDSPONSORNOT A COSPONSORNONE
PARTY MIX
0 REPUBLICANS4 DEMOCRATS

Plus the sponsor, a Democrat. Every cosponsor is from one party.

MOMENTUM
SEP 2026 · 4 ORIGINALNOW · 4

Rep. Casten’s record: sponsored 50 bills this Congress. 1 passed the House; 0 became law.

EVERY COSPONSOR · IN THE ORDER THEY JOINED4 ACTIVE
READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the House, or is signed into law.