Skip to main content
LAST ACTION SEP 17, 2026  UPDATED OCT 5
H.R. 10506HOUSE BILL · 119TH CONGRESS119THAGRICULTURE AND FOOD

Packers and Stockyards Improvements Act

Gives the Agriculture Secretary new investigative tools and expands protections against unfair livestock and poultry market practices.

WHERE IT STANDS

In the House Agriculture Committee since Sept. 17, 2026, 21 days after it was introduced. Most bills never leave committee.

  1. INTRODUCEDINTROSEP 17, 2026
  2. COMMITTEECOMM.IN COMMITTEE
  3. HOUSEHOUSE—
  4. SENATESENATE—
  5. LAWLAW—
Read the text
WHAT IT DOES

What the bill would do, and why it matters

BASED ON THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED
tl;drWRITTEN OCT 4 FROM THE TEXT AS INTRODUCED

The Packers and Stockyards Act sets rules for businesses that buy, process, or contract for livestock and poultry. This bill would give the Agriculture Secretary new ways to gather evidence in investigations and extend enforcement provisions to live poultry dealers. It would also define additional unfair market practices, require certain livestock data sharing, and protect people who report suspected violations.

  • INTRODUCED ONLY This bill has been introduced and possibly referred to a committee, but it has not passed any vote. Most introduced bills never become law — they die in committee without a hearing.
  • DATA NOTE No Congressional Research Service summary was available.
WHAT IT WOULD DO · 5 PROVISIONSINTRODUCED IN HOUSE
  1. Define unfair livestock-market practices

    The bill would define unfair practices to include certain conduct that harms competition or causes substantial injury that market participants cannot reasonably avoid and that is not outweighed by benefits. It would also specifically cover practices such as certain poultry-grower pay comparisons, some contract pricing and exclusivity terms, delayed cattle pickup, contract termination without compensation, and losses tied to plant closures.

  2. Authorize civil investigative demands

    Before starting an enforcement proceeding, the Agriculture Secretary could require people with relevant information to provide documents or physical items, answer written questions, or give oral testimony about a suspected unlawful practice. The bill sets procedures for these demands, including confidentiality rules and ways to challenge or enforce them.

  3. Protect Packers Act whistleblowers

    The bill would prohibit retaliation against employees, contractors, subcontractors, and agents who report suspected violations or assist government investigations or proceedings. Remedies could include reinstatement, lost income, other damages, and punitive damages of up to $400,000.

  4. Share livestock data with enforcers

    The Agriculture Department would regularly and continually share livestock data with its employees enforcing the Packers and Stockyards Act and with Commodity Futures Trading Commission employees enforcing the Commodity Exchange Act, so they can monitor possible violations.

  5. Extend enforcement authority to poultry dealers

    The bill would add live poultry dealers to several existing administrative enforcement provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act. It would also repeal three sections and renumber two others.

THE CONTEXT

The bill would change how suspected violations of the Packers and Stockyards Act can be investigated and would spell out additional practices that count as unfair. That could affect both the tools available to government investigators and the rules governing dealings among livestock and poultry businesses and producers.

Its compensation and whistleblower provisions would also affect what some producers could recover and what protections are available to people who report suspected misconduct.

Written from the bill text.

KEY DATES
WITHIN 180 DAYS OF THE VIOLATION
File a complaint over retaliation
AFTER 180 DAYS FROM FILING A COMPLAINT
Seek court action if Labor has not issued a final decision
WITHIN 20 DAYS OF SERVICE, OR BEFORE ITS RETURN DATE, WHICHEVER IS SHORTER
Petition to modify or set aside an investigative demand
FOR NO LESS THAN SEVEN YEARS
Compensate producers for certain processing-plant closure costs
TEXT VERSIONS
  1. IHIntroduced in HouseSEP 17, 20264,444
THE JOURNEY

The path it took, step by step

FROM THE OFFICIAL ACTIONS ON CONGRESS.GOV
  1. IntroducedSEP 17, 2026
    HOUSE
    SEP 17, 2026
    By Rep. Scanlon
    Referred to Agriculture
  2. SAME DAYNOW
    House committeeSEP 17, 2026
    AGRICULTURE NOW
    SEP 17, 2026
    In committee for 21 days
    No hearing yet
  3. 21 DAYS SO FAR
    Passed the House—
    HOUSE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  4. Senate committee—
    SENATE
    —
  5. Passed the Senate—
    SENATE FLOOR
    —
    Not scheduled
  6. Resolve differencesONLY IF NEEDED
    BOTH CHAMBERS
    ONLY IF NEEDED
    Skipped if the other chamber passes the same text
  7. Signed into law—
    PRESIDENT
    —
    10 days to sign or veto
KEY ACTIONS2 OF 2 · PROCEDURAL STEPS FOLDED
  1. SEP 172026SEP 17, 2026REFERREDHOUSEReferred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
  2. SEP 172026SEP 17, 2026INTRODUCEDHOUSEIntroduced in House
HOW LONG LAWS TAKE119 LAWS THIS CONGRESS

At day 21, this bill is already older than 6% of the laws passed this Congress were when they were signed.

DAYS FROM INTRODUCTION TO SIGNING · ○ CEREMONIAL
YOUR MEMBERS

Where your members stand on it

READERS · 0 COMMENTS

What readers think

READERS’ VIEWS, NOT CHAMBERLIGHT’S

What do you think?

0 votes

Discussion

Loading comments...
TRACK THIS BILL

Get an alert when it changes stage, gets a floor vote in the House, or is signed into law.