Paxton responds to Cornyn calling him 'lazy': 'They don't know my schedule'
Cornyn said Paxton was a poor campaigner and warned that his candidacy could make the Senate race harder for Republicans.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Yahoo News, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
Yahoo News is an established news platform, but this page appears to reproduce reporting associated with The Hill rather than provide clear evidence of Yahoo’s own reporting. The reporting has an attributed author and names sources for polling and fundraising figures.
- Source type — Yahoo News is an established news platform, though its pages include content from other publishers.
- Transparency — The page identifies an author and directs readers to The Hill for more news.
- Author attribution — A named author is provided, but the page does not clarify the reporting arrangement.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes statements and identifies its polling and campaign-finance sources.
The article includes direct quotations from Paxton and Cornyn and gives named sources and specific figures for polling and campaign funds. It provides limited context about the poll and no response from Talarico, while Paxton’s campaign activity is largely presented through his own claims.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Cornyn’s criticism and Paxton’s rebuttal, as well as polling and fundraising data that provide some broader campaign context. It does not include a response from Talarico or much independent context for the poll and campaign claims.
- Counterarguments presented — Paxton responds directly to Cornyn’s criticism, giving both sides of the central dispute.
- Source diversity — The article quotes the two Republicans and cites outside polling and FEC data, but has no Talarico comment.
- Omitted context — The article gives little detail about the survey methodology or independent evidence on campaign effort.
The article uses mostly neutral language and reports both Cornyn’s criticism and Paxton’s response. Polling and fundraising figures are included without an overtly partisan framing.
- Language tone — The writing is largely factual and attributes the sharpest language to the people quoted.
- Source selection — It includes statements from both Paxton and Cornyn, along with named polling and campaign-finance sources.
- Framing — The story frames the exchange as a campaign dispute and adds race-status information.
Republished with credit
Republished from The Hill, with credit to the original publisher.
194 stories · 78.5–79.2 · updated Oct 1, 2026
This is The Hill's own score, and this article is credited to The Hill. The host score in the Source Check is Yahoo News's.
Ken Paxton pushed back on John Cornyn’s criticism of his campaigning, saying he works long hours and is reaching voters and donors. The article also reports polling and fundraising figures in the Texas Senate race between Paxton and James Talarico.
Paxton disputed Cornyn’s description of him as a poor and lazy campaigner, saying he campaigns about 18 hours a day, travels around Texas and is trying to connect with voters. Cornyn had said Paxton’s campaign could make it harder for Republicans to win the Senate race, although he supports the party’s Texas ticket. Paxton also said he was contacting Cornyn’s donors and supporters.
The article reports that a Texas Public Opinion Research survey showed Talarico at 47 percent and Paxton at 40 percent, with 11 percent undecided; it gives the poll’s margin of error as 3.3 percentage points. It also cites Decision Desk HQ’s 55 percent win probability for Talarico and Federal Election Commission figures showing Talarico’s campaign had more than $21.5 million on hand at the end of June, compared with less than $1.8 million for Paxton’s.
Community verdict
8 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Republican Senate nominee responding to Cornyn’s criticism of his campaign
Paxton's version of this story ↗Democratic Senate nominee discussed in race polling and fundraising figures
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETSDiscussion · 0
Loading comments…

