Markwayne Mullin blasted at confirmation hearing by assaulted GOP colleague he called a 'snake'
Paul used Mullin’s confirmation hearing to challenge his account of the assault and question his fitness to lead Homeland Security.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Yahoo News, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
Yahoo News is an established national publisher, and this page identifies the AL.com article as the original while crediting the Associated Press for contributing. The reporting is attributed, though the page appears to reproduce rather than originate the story.
- Source type — Established national news publisher, though this page republishes an article from another outlet.
- Author attribution — The article names Howard Koplowitz and credits the Associated Press for a contribution.
- Transparency — The page identifies AL.com as the original source.
- Editorial standards — The text gives no specific information about corrections or editorial policies.
The report includes substantial direct quotations from both senators and relevant background about the assault. The hearing exchange is clear, but the piece relies mainly on the participants’ accounts and offers limited independent corroboration or broader context.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story includes the competing accounts and Mullin’s denial, but the opening and much of the detail center Paul’s accusations. It provides little independent evidence to resolve their disagreement.
- Counterarguments presented — Mullin responds to the accusations and explains his own account of the remarks.
- Source diversity — The central perspectives are both represented, but most sourcing consists of the two senators’ statements.
- Framing — The lead and headline foreground Paul’s criticism of Mullin.
- Omitted context — The article gives limited independent corroboration of what Mullin previously told Paul.
The report uses a critical headline and leads with Paul’s case against Mullin, but it also includes Mullin’s response at length. The language is mostly descriptive and attributed rather than overtly partisan.
- Source selection — The report quotes both Paul and Mullin directly.
- Language tone — Most claims and judgments are attributed to the senators rather than asserted by the reporter.
- Headline — The headline foregrounds Paul’s criticism and Mullin’s insult, giving the story a critical initial frame.
Republished with credit
Republished from al, with credit to the original publisher.
27 stories · 75–78 · updated Oct 8, 2026
This is al's own score, and this article is credited to al. The host score in the Source Check is Yahoo News's.
At Markwayne Mullin’s Homeland Security confirmation hearing, Sen. Rand Paul accused him of justifying the past assault on Paul and lying about what he had said. Mullin defended his remarks, denied condoning violence and said their feud would not affect his leadership.
At Mullin’s confirmation hearing, Sen. Rand Paul said Mullin had called him a “freaking snake” and said he understood why Paul had been assaulted. Paul argued that this raised questions about Mullin’s fitness to lead Homeland Security, including an agency he said had struggled with limits on the use of force. Paul also accused Mullin of lying about having told him directly that the assault was justified.
Mullin said he had meant he understood the neighbor’s actions in light of Paul’s behavior, but that he did not approve of a surprise attack. He disputed Paul’s account, pointed to their political disagreements, and said those differences would not stop him from protecting the country if confirmed.
Community verdict
23 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator and nominee to lead the Department of Homeland Security
Mullin's version of this story ↗President who selected Mullin as his Homeland Security nominee
Former head of the Department of Homeland Security
Part of a bigger story
36 OUTLETSAt Markwayne Mullin’s Senate confirmation hearing for Homeland Security secretary, Rand Paul challenged him over past remarks about Paul’s assault and political violence, and said he would vote against the nomination. Left-leaning outlets center Paul’s criticism, with some presenting it as merited and relevant to Mullin’s fitness. Center outlets pair the confrontation with Mullin’s answers and questions about DHS policy, funding, immigration and travel. Right-leaning outlets also stress the clash, while some foreground Mullin’s rebuttal or question Paul’s conduct.
- ARTICLES
- 39
- OUTLETS
- 36
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



