Fresh from the Senate, can Markwayne Mullin help break the DHS deadlock?
Experts say Mullin’s recent Senate experience could help him communicate with lawmakers during the DHS funding impasse.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Newschannel9, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
WTVC is an established local news outlet, and the article identifies its author and attributes analysis to named political experts. The byline credits The National News Desk, indicating the reporting is attributed content rather than clearly original WTVC reporting.
- Source type — Established local news publisher; a credible baseline for reported news.
- Author attribution — The byline names Cory Smith and The National News Desk.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes assessments to named academic experts and distinguishes their analysis from reported facts.
The article includes detailed comments from two named political experts and explains the funding impasse and the competing issues. It provides little direct comment from the administration or Senate Democrats, so some key perspectives are represented indirectly.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article explains the administration’s position, Democrats’ demands and the practical effects of the shutdown. Its analysis relies on outside experts rather than direct responses from the parties to the dispute.
- Source diversity — Two named experts are quoted, but neither the administration nor Senate Democrats speak directly.
- Counterarguments presented — The article outlines both the administration’s SAVE Act demand and Democrats’ proposed enforcement reforms.
- Loaded language — Most language is neutral; pointed descriptions are attributed to quoted experts.
The article uses neutral language and attributes its assessments to academic experts. It describes the administration’s position and Democrats’ demands without an evident partisan framing.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive wording, with critical characterizations attributed to experts.
- Framing — The article examines both Mullin’s possible role and the obstacles to a funding agreement.
- Source selection — Two political experts provide analysis; neither is presented as a partisan advocate.
Republished with credit
Republished from Foxbaltimore, with credit to the original publisher.
Not enough stories yet: 2 of 10.
New DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin could use his Senate experience to help negotiate an end to the department’s funding impasse, experts say, but President Donald Trump’s insistence on including the SAVE Act may be a major obstacle. Airport delays and pressure on lawmakers could push talks toward a deal.
Political experts said Mullin’s experience as a senator may help him speak with lawmakers and explain what kind of deal could pass, though they cautioned that his relationships with Senate Democrats are not especially strong. One expert also said Mullin has expressed willingness to require judicial warrants for home searches.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Mullin in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Mullin’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →New Homeland Security secretary and former senator
President whose SAVE Act demand is described as an obstacle to DHS funding negotiations
Trump's version of this story ↗Former Homeland Security secretary, used as a comparison for Mullin
Part of a bigger story
20 OUTLETSThe Senate confirmed Markwayne Mullin as Homeland Security secretary in a 54-45 vote. He took over the department amid a funding shutdown and disputes over immigration enforcement. Center outlets mostly present the confirmation and swearing-in as a leadership transition, while some examine the funding impasse and Mullin’s prospective approach to DHS. Right-leaning outlets also cover the transition amid shutdown and immigration disputes, but some characterize the funding fight as Democratic obstruction and emphasize his enforcement agenda.
- ARTICLES
- 23
- OUTLETS
- 20
- AVG CRED
- 65
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


