Lewandowski's lawyers respond to Sen. Hassan
Hassan sought to preserve records and investigate allegations about Lewandowski’s work at DHS.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYWMUR is an established regional news outlet with an identified reporter, and the article attributes statements to Hassan and to a letter obtained by the newsroom. The short report offers limited independent context about the underlying allegations.
- Source type — Established local television news outlet.
- Transparency — The article identifies the letter as the source of the lawyers’ response and attributes Hassan’s remarks.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Editorial standards — The outlet has the characteristics of a professional newsroom, though this article provides little detail about its verification of the underlying allegations.
The report includes direct statements from Hassan and Lewandowski’s lawyers and identifies the letter as the basis for the response. It provides little background or independent evidence about the contract allegations and does not include a response from Hassan to the lawyers’ letter.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The report presents both Hassan’s stated purpose and the lawyers’ objections, but gives little context about the underlying allegations or the legal dispute over the senator’s authority.
- Counterarguments presented — The lawyers’ response is presented alongside Hassan’s earlier explanation.
- Source diversity — The article includes the senator and the subject’s lawyers, but no independent expert or additional source.
- Omitted context — It does not detail the underlying contract allegations or provide further context on the scope of Hassan’s authority.
The report presents Hassan’s stated rationale alongside the lawyers’ objections, using attributed quotations without clear partisan framing.
- Language tone — The article attributes the lawyers’ sharp characterization rather than adopting it as the reporter’s own language.
- Source selection — It includes remarks from Hassan and the lawyers responding on Lewandowski’s behalf.
- Framing — The story is framed as a response to Hassan’s request for an investigation, without an evident ideological argument.
Lawyers for Corey Lewandowski challenged Sen. Maggie Hassan’s authority to compel information as she seeks an investigation into his handling of DHS contracts. They also rejected the factual characterizations in her letter.
Hassan said she wanted Lewandowski to preserve documents and records while allegations about his handling of contracts during his DHS leadership are investigated. She said the records could help establish whether the allegations are true.
In a letter obtained by News 9, Lewandowski’s lawyers called Hassan’s effort “an exercise in publicity dressed up as oversight” and argued that a senator acting alone cannot compel him to provide documents or answers. They also said Lewandowski rejects the factual characterizations and implications in her letter.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSED
No good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Hassan in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Hassan’s record.
People in this story
Senator seeking an investigation into Lewandowski’s handling of DHS contracts
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…