Cooke campaign sends cease-and-desist to Congressman Van Orden over AI deepfakes
Cooke’s attorneys sent Van Orden a cease-and-desist letter over videos that attributed statements to her.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYWPR is a regional public-radio newsroom, and the article identifies its reporter and attributes claims to the attorneys’ letter and the campaigns. The article provides limited independent context beyond the competing statements.
- Source type — Established local public-radio news organization.
- Editorial standards — The story attributes disputed claims to the letter and campaign statements rather than presenting them as independently established conclusions.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Transparency — The article identifies the relevant campaign statements and the legal notice.
The report gives concrete examples of the videos and quotes both Cooke’s attorneys and Van Orden’s campaign. It offers some context about the race and the law cited in the letter, but does not include a direct response from Van Orden or independent legal analysis.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article describes the videos and the legal concerns raised by Cooke’s attorneys, and includes a response from Van Orden’s campaign. It does not include a direct explanation from Van Orden or independent legal commentary.
- Counterarguments presented — Van Orden’s campaign responds with criticism of Cooke, but does not directly address the videos or legal concerns.
- Source diversity — The article quotes both campaigns and the attorneys’ letter, but relies on a limited set of sources.
- Omitted context — No direct response from Van Orden or outside legal analysis is included.
The article uses largely descriptive language and presents statements from both campaigns. Its account of the videos relies substantially on Cooke’s attorneys’ characterization, but the article also includes the opposing campaign’s criticism.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive language, with disputed judgments attributed to the letter or campaigns.
- Source selection — Quotes Cooke, her attorneys and Van Orden’s campaign, though not Van Orden directly.
- Framing — Centers the cease-and-desist letter and the videos that prompted it.
Rebecca Cooke’s campaign sent Rep. Derrick Van Orden a cease-and-desist letter over AI-generated videos that attribute false statements to her. Van Orden’s campaign criticized Cooke, while Van Orden later shared another AI-assisted clip.
Cooke’s attorneys say videos Van Orden shared on X falsely depict her making statements she never made. Their Sept. 30 letter cites a video posted Aug. 4 and warns that the videos could violate Wisconsin defamation law; it says they are monitoring his accounts and weighing legal options. Cooke also criticized Van Orden’s use of the videos and linked the technology to tax breaks for data centers.
Van Orden’s campaign accused Cooke of lying to voters, and Van Orden responded to the letter with another Grok-assisted video featuring an AI-generated duck. Cooke is challenging Van Orden in Wisconsin’s 3rd Congressional District after losing to him in the 2024 general election.
Community verdict
11 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →House candidate whose campaign challenged Van Orden’s AI-generated videos
Representative who shared AI-generated videos depicting Cooke
Van Orden's version of this story ↗Former president shown in one of the AI-generated videos
Cooke’s opponent in the 2022 Democratic primary
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSRebecca Cooke sent Rep. Derrick Van Orden a cease-and-desist letter over AI-generated campaign videos that she said falsely attributed statements to her. Left-leaning outlets frame the videos as misleading ads and highlight Van Orden’s follow-up video. Center outlets use more restrained language, include responses from both campaigns, and some place the dispute in the broader debate over campaign deepfakes.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 75
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


