EMR fires: Rep. Norcross promotes lithium-ion battery bill
Norcross is promoting a battery-detection and recycling bill in response to recurring fires at a Camden recycling company.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYWHYY is an established regional public-media newsroom, and this report identifies its author and uses public records alongside interviews and attributed claims. The article offers meaningful local reporting, though the supplied text does not establish its correction practices.
- Source type — Established local-news organization with a public-service reporting mission.
- Editorial standards — Reporting includes interviews, attributed company claims and public-records findings.
- Author attribution — The article names Sophia Schmidt as its author.
- Transparency — The story identifies its sources and describes the records requests behind some findings.
The report combines interviews with a resident, company officials, a recycling-industry scientist and a member of Congress with details from public records and a state lawsuit. It includes competing perspectives and the limits of the proposed technology, though the article gives little independent analysis of whether the bill would reduce fires.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story presents the company’s battery explanation and safety response alongside a resident’s criticism and records showing the causes of several fires were undetermined. It also explains the bill’s stalled status and the technology’s current limitations.
- Counterarguments presented — A resident challenges the company’s explanation, and records show several fire causes were undetermined.
- Source diversity — Draws on community, company, industry, congressional and documentary sources.
- Omitted context — The article does not independently resolve the causes of the fires or assess the bill’s likely effectiveness.
- Loaded language — Generally attributes charged characterizations to the people who made them.
The report uses mostly neutral language and attributes claims about battery-related fires to the company and other named sources. It includes resident concerns and records that complicate the company’s explanation without adopting an overt partisan frame.
- Language tone — Uses descriptive, attributed language rather than overtly partisan or emotionally loaded framing.
- Source selection — Includes company representatives, a resident, an industry scientist, a lawmaker and public records.
- Framing — Connects the bill to recurring fires while also reporting uncertainty about their causes and limits in available technology.
Rep. Donald Norcross is promoting a bill that would encourage detection and recycling of lithium-ion batteries, which EMR says contribute to fires at its Camden facilities. The article also reports residents’ concerns, records showing fire causes were undetermined, and new safety measures at the company.
Norcross says his bill would provide tax incentives for battery detectors, tax battery manufacturers and create a grant program for battery recycling. The bill has not advanced in committee since its introduction last fall; Norcross said Frank Pallone would help move it if Democrats win control of the House and Pallone becomes committee chair.
EMR says lithium-ion batteries delivered to its facilities are a primary cause of fires and are difficult to detect. WHYY reports that a state lawsuit says EMR’s Camden facilities have had 14 major fires since 2020, while three incident reports found the probable causes of the fires they covered were undetermined. Residents have raised pollution and health concerns, and EMR says it has adopted court-mandated fire-safety measures.
Community verdict
10 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Promotes a bill intended to encourage detection and recycling of lithium-ion batteries.
Named as the prospective committee chair Norcross says could help advance the bill.
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

