Skip to main content
3 min read
● InformationalForeign PolicyEconomy

Lindsey Graham may be gone, but his bill targeting Russia's energy and defense industries just landed on Donald Trump's desk

The bill would give Trump authority over tariffs, but the article says he has preferred to retain direct control over sanctions and tariffs.

Lindsey Graham may be gone, but his bill targeting Russia's energy and defense industries just landed on Donald Trump's desk
Image · We Got This Covered

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityWe Got This Covered44/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Sep 29, 2026
tl;dr

The House passed a Russia sanctions and tariff bill 262-159, sending it to President Donald Trump. Supporters say it would increase pressure on Russia; Democratic leaders warned it gives Trump too much discretion and could raise costs for American families.

Community verdict

11 VOTES
How does this story look for
Donald Trump R · President of the United States
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who received the bill and would decide how to proceed

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Lindsey Graham
Former U.S. Senator (R-SC)

Late South Carolina senator who introduced the measure; the bill was named in his honor.

Graham's version of this story ↗

Lead sponsor of the bill and defender of its tariff provisions.

McCaul's version of this story ↗

House Democratic leader who criticized the bill’s grant of authority to the president and its potential costs.

Jeffries's version of this story ↗
Mike Johnson
R · LA-4

House Speaker who supported the bill in a statement after its passage.

Darline Graham
R · SC · SEN

Senator appointed to fill her late brother Lindsey Graham’s seat; she commented on the bill’s significance to him.

Pete Aguilar
D · CA-33

House Democratic leader who joined a statement criticizing the bill’s presidential authority and potential costs.

House Democratic leader who joined a statement objecting to the bill’s presidential authority and potential costs.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…