Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for MaceEthics / Corruption

Mace condemns House vote, says members chose to keep the truth buried

Mace criticized colleagues after the House referred her resolution on public access to misconduct reports to committee.

Mace condemns House vote, says members chose to keep the truth buried
Image · Abcnews4

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityAbcnews474/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 9, 2026
Abcnews4
Mar 6, 2026
tl;dr

Nancy Mace criticized the House’s 357-65 decision to refer her resolution seeking public release of misconduct reports to committee. She said lawmakers who opposed it were keeping the truth buried, as Tony Gonzales announced he was leaving his reelection race.

Community verdict

22 VOTES
How does this story look for
Nancy Mace R · SC-1
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Nancy Mace
R · SC-1

Representative and sponsor of the resolution criticizing the House vote

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Mike Johnson
R · LA-4

House Speaker who joined Republican leaders in asking Gonzales to withdraw

Tony Gonzales
Former U.S. Representative (R-TX)

Representative who announced he was withdrawing from his reelection race

House Republican Conference Chair who joined Republican leaders in asking Gonzales to withdraw

Steve Scalise
R · LA-1

House Majority Leader who joined Republican leaders in asking Gonzales to withdraw

Tom Emmer
R · MN-6

House Majority Whip who joined Republican leaders in asking Gonzales to withdraw

Part of a bigger story

7 OUTLETS
House Refers Mace Resolution on Sexual Misconduct Records to Ethics Committee

Outlets agree the House voted 357-65 to refer Rep. Nancy Mace’s resolution seeking public release of congressional sexual-misconduct investigation records to the Ethics Committee. Center outlets describe the referral as ending her push while reporting both her criticism and committee concerns that disclosure could hinder investigations or discourage cooperation. Right-leaning outlets frame it more as a setback for transparency, emphasizing Mace’s criticism of the referral.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…