Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for PaxtonElections / Campaigns

Clay Travis Uses Ken Paxton Ad and a Sideways Jasmine Crockett 'Compliment' to End James Talarico

The article praises a new ad from Paxton’s Senate campaign as an effective attack on James Talarico.

Clay Travis Uses Ken Paxton Ad and a Sideways Jasmine Crockett 'Compliment' to End James Talarico
Image · twitchy.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilitytwitchy.com38/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 6, 2026
May 29, 2026
tl;dr

Twitchy praises Ken Paxton’s new Senate campaign ad and Clay Travis’s post about it, describing the ad as damaging to James Talarico. The article also contrasts Talarico with Jasmine Crockett and cites a prediction market giving Paxton a 60% chance to win.

Community verdict

3 VOTES
How does this story look for
Ken Paxton R · TX
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Ken Paxton
R · TX

Senate candidate whose campaign released the ad

PRIMARY SUBJECT

Senate candidate targeted by the ad and commentary

Talarico's version of this story ↗

Representative and prospective comparison to Talarico

Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President referenced in comparison to a past campaign ad

Kamala Harris
Former U.S. Senator (D-CA)

Former vice president referenced as the target of a past campaign ad

ALSO MENTIONED  Clay Travis, Commentator who shared the ad and criticized Talarico

Part of a bigger story

11 OUTLETS
Ken Paxton Releases Ad Targeting James Talarico’s Masculinity

Ken Paxton’s campaign released a general-election ad attacking James Talarico, using masculinity-focused rhetoric. Left-leaning outlets frame the ad as part of a Republican strategy centered on masculinity and examine its cultural implications. Center outlets place the ad amid the wider Senate campaign, including Talarico’s focus on Paxton’s scandals and the candidates’ competing messages. Right-leaning outlets emphasize attacks on Talarico’s past remarks and his perceived fit with Texas voters, with some portraying the ad as effective.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…