All It Took for Democrats to Cave on DHS Funding Was Four Terrorist Attacks
Slotkin voted against DHS funding, then said the department should be funded while ICE was treated as a separate issue.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTownhall is an established, openly conservative publisher, but this is an opinion article with strongly partisan framing rather than independent, multi-perspective reporting.
- Source type — Opinion publisher with an explicit conservative identity.
- Editorial standards — The page presents arguments and social-media quotes, with limited visible independent verification.
- Author attribution — The article identifies Amy Curtis as its author.
The article includes specific events and quotes from named people, but its highly charged language, reliance on social-media excerpts and lack of meaningful competing perspectives limit its evidentiary strength.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents a sustained criticism of Democrats, but gives no substantive response from Slotkin, Peters or other supporters of the funding position.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive case for the Democrats’ position on DHS or ICE funding is offered.
- Loaded language — The article repeatedly uses charged descriptions and assertions about Democrats’ motives.
- Source diversity — The quoted criticism comes from a commentator and social-media posts; opposing sources are absent.
The article uses strongly anti-Democratic and pro-enforcement framing, portrays the party’s actions as putting Americans at risk, and ends with a partisan electoral appeal.
- Language tone — Uses accusatory and emotionally charged language about Democrats and immigration.
- Framing — Links Democratic opposition to DHS funding with alleged disregard for public safety.
- Headline — The headline frames Democrats as having “cave[d]” only after terror attacks.
Amy Curtis argues that Democrats kept the Department of Homeland Security shut down over immigration policy, then highlights Sen. Elissa Slotkin saying DHS should be funded while ICE funding is discussed separately. The article criticizes Slotkin and Michigan Sen. Gary Peters for voting against DHS funding after a series of attacks.
Amy Curtis says Sen. Brian Schatz described Democrats as “serene” during the shutdown despite unpaid TSA agents and airport delays. The article recounts four attacks it characterizes as terrorist attacks, including the Temple Israel attack in Michigan, then says Elissa Slotkin and Gary Peters voted against a bill to fund DHS.
Curtis contrasts Slotkin’s vote with her later statement that DHS should be funded and that the discussion about ICE should be separated from DHS’s core missions. The article quotes commentator Guy Benson criticizing her for voting to keep DHS closed, and concludes by urging readers to remember the issue in the midterm elections.
Community verdict
15 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator criticized for voting against DHS funding and later calling for DHS funding separate from the ICE debate
Senator whose description of his party as “serene” is cited in the shutdown debate
Senator who voted against a bill to fund DHS
Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETSElissa Slotkin said the Department of Homeland Security should be funded while the debate over ICE funding remained separate, after voting against a measure to reopen DHS funding. Her remarks followed recent attacks, including an attack at a Michigan synagogue. Right-leaning outlets focus on the contrast between Slotkin’s earlier vote and later call to fund DHS, often linking the timing to attacks and criticizing her shift.
- ARTICLES
- 5
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 44
- Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion | · Democrat Senator Suddenly Open to DHS Funding After Michigan Synagogue Attack
- redstate.com · We Now Know How Many Terrorist Attacks It Takes to Get Democrats to Blink on DHS Funding
- twitchy.com · Dem Sen. Elissa Slotkin Says Recent Attacks Show DHS Should Be Funded (Shortly After Voting Against It)
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


