Embattled Democrat Don David Is Lying About His Support for Radical Trans Policies
Curtis argues that Davis’s campaign ad conflicts with his past vote and his support for the Equality Act.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTownhall is an opinion-oriented publisher, and this article is an explicitly argumentative column rather than independent, multi-source reporting. The author is identified, but the piece offers little sourcing beyond the quoted ad and its own descriptions of Davis’s record.
- Source type — Opinion-first outlet and a column making a political argument.
- Editorial standards — The text does not demonstrate independent verification or cite supporting documents.
- Author attribution — The author is named.
- Transparency — The article identifies the campaign ad and describes the claimed voting and sponsorship record, but provides limited detail for checking those claims.
The article quotes Davis’s ad and identifies specific claimed legislative actions, but presents a strongly one-sided argument without a response from Davis or independent sourcing for its interpretation of the Equality Act’s effects.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article advances a single critical case against Davis, uses loaded language, and does not provide a response from him or a countervailing perspective.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Davis or counterargument is included.
- Loaded language — The column repeatedly uses accusatory and evaluative language.
- Source diversity — The argument relies mainly on the author’s characterization of the record and the quoted campaign ad.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article is explicitly opinion and argues for a conclusion about Davis.
The column uses strongly critical language about Davis and frames his position as deceptive and radical. Its framing and word choice align with a right-leaning perspective.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “lying,” “radical,” and “fool” to condemn Davis.
- Framing — Frames Davis’s ad as an effort to conceal an objectionable record.
- Source selection — Presents Davis’s ad but provides no other perspective or response.
Amy Curtis argues that Rep. Don Davis’s campaign ad portraying him as supportive of state decisions on girls’ sports conflicts with his past vote and his support for the Equality Act. The piece also briefly cites records or positions of three other Democratic candidates.
Curtis says a group that endorsed Davis promoted a booth at Greensboro Pride and quotes Davis praising the group. She then argues that Davis’s campaign ad, in which he says states should decide how to protect women and girls in sports, conflicts with his vote against the Protection of Women and Girls Act and his original co-sponsorship of the 2023 Equality Act. Curtis contends that the Equality Act would override state laws.
The piece also says Marcy Kaptur voted four times on the issue, Sherrod Brown criticized laws prohibiting drag shows for minors, and Dan Osborn pledged to be a trans ally if elected. Curtis concludes that Davis is presenting himself as a moderate despite his record.
Community verdict
2 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →North Carolina representative criticized for his campaign ad and record on transgender policies in sports
Ohio representative cited for past votes on women’s sports
Nebraska Senate candidate who pledged to be a trans ally if elected
Ohio Senate candidate cited for a statement about laws prohibiting drag shows for minors
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



