Christine Flowers: Dems Deflect, Attack, and Still Back Scandalous Graham Platner
Flowers argues that Democrats continue to support Platner despite allegations about his conduct and past tattoo.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Patriot Post is an opinion-oriented publisher, and this column is openly argumentative rather than reported original journalism. The author is identified, but the article offers little sourcing for its claims.
- Source type — An opinion publisher and an explicitly opinionated column warrant a lower institutional-credibility rating than a reporting-focused newsroom.
- Editorial standards — The text provides few verifiable sources or supporting documents for its claims.
- Author attribution — The column identifies Christine Flowers as its author.
- Transparency — The page identifies the publisher and author, but the article does not explain its sourcing.
The column makes specific allegations but supplies no cited records, named sources, or responses from the people discussed. Its charged language and one-sided presentation limit its evidentiary value.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The column advances a sustained criticism of Democrats and Platner without presenting their explanations or responses in meaningful detail.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantial response from Platner or Democrats is included.
- Loaded language — Frequent ridicule and accusatory phrasing shape the account.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is explicitly a column and argues a clear position.
- Source diversity — The article relies on the author's assertions rather than a range of sources.
The column strongly favors Collins and attacks Democrats and Platner, using ridicule and accusatory language while presenting little counterargument.
- Language tone — Uses derisive descriptions and charged phrases about Democrats and Platner.
- Framing — Frames Democratic support for Platner as hypocrisy and a willingness to overlook misconduct to oppose Trump.
- Source selection — Presents the author's claims and characterizations without meaningful opposing perspectives.
Christine Flowers argues that Democrats continue to support Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner despite allegations about his conduct and past tattoo, while criticizing them for their attacks on Susan Collins and Donald Trump.
Flowers recounts allegations that Platner frequented a pornography website, sexted with women, and had a tattoo she describes as Nazi-related. She says Platner attributed his past conduct to combat service and that Democrats defended him or dismissed criticism of his judgment. The column does not provide independent sourcing for these claims.
Flowers contrasts the Democrats’ response to Platner with their past criticism of Trump’s recorded remarks, and argues that Democrats back Platner because they oppose Trump. She also portrays Collins as a moderate Republican who sometimes breaks with her party, in contrast to the criticism Democrats direct at her.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Platner in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Platner’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Former senator used as a comparison in discussing Platner’s tattoo and PTSD
Maine senator discussed as a contrast to Platner
President whose past recorded remarks are used as a comparison
Defense secretary cited in a comparison about tattoos
Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETSRep. Ro Khanna said he continues to support Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner while condemning his past behavior. Center outlets pair Khanna’s continued support with accounts of allegations against Platner and his criticism of Platner’s behavior. Right-leaning outlets emphasize controversy around Platner and Democratic backing, while Breitbart also highlights Khanna’s opposition to foreign wars.
- ARTICLES
- 5
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 61
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





