Todd Blanche says he's not Trump's lawyer. The senators in charge of his future aren't convinced
Tillis said the fund should not be paid out and appeared to secure assurances from Blanche before indicating he would vote yes.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Independent is an established news organization with a named reporter and a record of reporting on U.S. politics. The article includes direct quotations and identifies the people making key claims, though its strongly critical framing warrants some caution.
- Source type — An established international news outlet covering U.S. politics.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes key claims and includes direct quotations, though its presentation is pointed.
The article uses attributed statements from Blanche, senators and a judge and reports specific details about the settlement and hearing. Blanche's responses are included, but the framing is sharply critical and the article offers limited broader context or countervailing perspectives.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Blanche's denials and explanations, along with concerns from both Democratic and Republican senators. Its critical language and limited presentation of defenses or broader context leave the piece substantially tilted toward the critics.
- Counterarguments presented — Blanche's explanations and denials appear, but the article does not substantially develop a defense of the fund or settlement.
- Loaded language — Several descriptions and transitions frame Blanche and the settlement in strongly critical terms.
- Source diversity — Quotes Blanche, Democratic and Republican senators, and a judge, but the quoted perspectives are predominantly critical.
- Omitted context — Provides limited context about the legal arguments or the administration's broader rationale.
The article uses strongly critical language about Blanche and the Trump administration, including characterizations of the fund and the settlement. Although it includes Blanche's responses, the overall framing and selection of detail lean left.
- Language tone — Uses notably critical descriptions of the fund, the settlement and Blanche's conduct.
- Framing — Centers doubts about Blanche's independence and loyalty to Trump.
- Source selection — Features critical Democratic and Republican lawmakers and a judge's rebuke, while giving less space to defenses of the administration's actions.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended his record and his ties to Donald Trump at a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis raised concerns about a fund tied to a settlement benefiting Trump and his allies, while Tillis indicated he would support Blanche.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee seeking the job permanently. He defended his work at the Justice Department, including a memo concerning tax investigations of Trump and his family, and said a fund tied to a settlement was not moving forward, though he acknowledged it could still be enforced.
Community verdict
22 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator who criticized the fund and indicated support for Blanche
Senator questioning a settlement tied to a fund benefiting Trump’s allies
Cornyn's version of this story ↗Acting attorney general seeking confirmation as attorney general
Blanche's version of this story ↗Blanche’s former client and a party to the IRS lawsuit and settlement
Senator who challenged Blanche about his record
Federal judge who sanctioned Trump’s legal team
Senator who criticized Blanche at the confirmation hearing
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






