Primaries prove it: In New York, pro-Israel politics are now a liability
Goldman’s loss and his campaign’s approach to Israel are part of the article’s comparison of two New York races.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates The Forward, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The Forward is an established nonprofit newsroom, but this piece is explicitly an opinion article that originally appeared at JTA. Its credibility therefore rests primarily on JTA’s work and the article’s clearly disclosed attribution.
- Source type — An established news organization republishes an explicitly labeled opinion article from JTA.
- Transparency — The article identifies its author and states that it originally appeared on JTA.org.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
The argument is supported with specific election results, candidate statements and comparisons between races. It is an explicitly opinionated interpretation and gives limited space to counterarguments or perspectives from the candidates who lost.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece offers concrete results and quotes from winning candidates, but it advances a clear argument about the consequences for pro-Israel politics without developing competing interpretations of the races.
- Counterarguments presented — The author allows that the trend may be limited to New York but does not develop a substantial alternative explanation.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article is explicitly an opinion piece and argues for a particular reading of the results.
- Source diversity — It includes candidate remarks and election outcomes but relies mainly on the author’s analysis.
- Loaded language — Some emphatic wording supports the argument, though the piece also reports specific results and quotations.
The author frames pro-Israel politics as increasingly vulnerable and treats the victories of candidates critical of Israel as a warning to the pro-Israel community. This is a modest rightward tilt in the article’s framing, rather than a uniformly partisan treatment of broader political issues.
- Framing — The article presents the election outcomes chiefly as a warning for pro-Israel Democrats.
- Source selection — Candidate statements are included, but the interpretation is led by the author’s perspective on the risks to pro-Israel politics.
- Language tone — Terms such as “seismic” and “career-ender” reinforce the author’s interpretation of the results.
Republished with credit
Republished from Jewish Telegraphic Agency, with credit to the original publisher.
Not enough stories yet: 8 of 10.
Ami Eden argues that New York’s congressional primaries show pro-Israel positions becoming a political liability among some Democratic voters, pointing to Brad Lander’s and Darializa Avila Chevalier’s victories over Daniel Goldman and Adriano Espaillat. Ritchie Torres’s primary victory offers a contrasting result.
Eden argues that the primary results signal a change in New York Democratic politics: Brad Lander and Darializa Avila Chevalier won after making their opponents’ support for Israel and AIPAC a focus, while Daniel Goldman and Adriano Espaillat lost. Eden describes the results as a sign that criticism of Israel may be an increasingly successful campaign strategy.
The article contrasts those defeats with Ritchie Torres’s primary victory and Adrian Boafo’s win in Maryland, where Boafo had backing from AIPAC. Lander said in his victory speech that he would advocate for Palestinian human rights and oppose U.S. funding for Netanyahu’s wars; Eden notes that it remains uncertain whether the New York results will predict outcomes elsewhere.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Goldman in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Goldman’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative defeated by Brad Lander in the New York primary
Representative defeated by Darializa Avila Chevalier in the New York primary
Espaillat's version of this story ↗Democratic House candidate who defeated Daniel Goldman in the New York primary
Lander's version of this story ↗Democratic House candidate who defeated Adriano Espaillat in the New York primary
Avila Chevalier's version of this story ↗House candidate who won the Maryland primary to succeed Steny Hoyer
Representative who won his New York primary
Representative whose Maryland seat is being vacated
Part of a bigger story
6 OUTLETSBrad Lander defeated Daniel Goldman in the Democratic primary for New York’s 10th Congressional District. Center outlets split: some present the results as a warning for pro-Israel Democrats, while The Forward argues the Goldman-Lander race was not simply about Israel and emphasizes Jewish safety and coalition-building. Right-leaning outlets treat Israel policy as central to Goldman’s loss and as a warning about its political costs for pro-Israel Democrats.
- ARTICLES
- 7
- OUTLETS
- 6
- AVG CRED
- 73
- The Forward · The biggest Jewish issue in NY's most Jewish primary wasn't Israel
- The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com · The Zohran Mamdani effect: Democrats now have to worry about being too pro-Israel
- Jns · Mamdani-backed Lander ousts incumbent Goldman, calls for 'new humanism' in politics - Israel & Jewish News
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






