Nancy Mace Concedes South Carolina Gubernatorial Primary After Failing To Gain Trump's Support
Mace conceded the South Carolina Republican gubernatorial primary and said her support for releasing the Epstein files was worth the political cost.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Daily Caller has an identifiable newsroom and byline, but its partisan orientation and comparatively limited transparency about corrections and editorial processes temper its institutional credibility.
- Source type — A national outlet that publishes political reporting, with a right-leaning editorial orientation.
- Author attribution — The article names a reporter.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes claims and includes a response from the Evette campaign, though the outlet's partisan orientation is relevant.
- Transparency — The page identifies the publisher and reporter, but provides limited information about corrections practices.
The article reports the primary result and includes attributable statements from Mace and an Evette campaign spokesperson. It relies heavily on Mace's account and provides limited independent context about the race or the competing campaigns.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes the Evette campaign's response to Mace's accusation, but most of its detail comes from Mace's statements and there is little independent or opposing context about the race.
- Source diversity — Mace and an Evette campaign spokesperson are quoted or paraphrased; other candidates' perspectives are absent.
- Counterarguments presented — The Evette campaign disputes the claim that the alleged assailant worked for it and says it opposes violence.
- Omitted context — The article gives limited context on the full primary field and voters' reasons for their choices.
- Loaded language — The most charged language is attributed to Mace rather than presented as the article's own verdict.
The article largely recounts the result and attributes the candidates' claims without clear ideological framing. Its emphasis on Mace's account does not establish a consistent partisan lean.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive language, with charged statements presented as quotations from Mace.
- Source selection — Includes Mace's statements and a response from the Evette campaign, but little independent analysis.
- Framing — Frames the story around Mace's concession and her lack of Trump's endorsement, consistent with the reported event.
Nancy Mace conceded her South Carolina gubernatorial primary after finishing far behind, while Trump-endorsed candidates Pamela Evette and Alan Wilson advanced to a runoff. Mace said her support for releasing the Epstein files cost her support. [not allowed ids prose]
Nancy Mace conceded the South Carolina Republican gubernatorial primary on Tuesday after placing fifth, according to the article. Trump-endorsed Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and Attorney General Alan Wilson advanced to a June 23 runoff. Mace said she was “at peace” with supporting the release of the Epstein files even if it cost her the election.
Mace said she believed her support for releasing the files was the reason Trump did not endorse her. The article also recounts her accusation that an Evette supporter attacked a Mace supporter; an Evette spokesperson said the individual had never worked for the campaign and that the campaign did not condone violence. [not allowed ids prose]
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Mace in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Mace’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative from Iowa
Former attorney general
President and endorser of Pamela Evette
Representative from Kentucky
Representative from Colorado
Former representative from Georgia
Senator from Louisiana
Representative from Louisiana
Texas attorney general and Senate candidate
Republican House candidate in Kentucky
Senator from Texas
Part of a bigger story
18 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Nancy Mace lost South Carolina’s Republican gubernatorial primary and did not advance to the runoff. Left-leaning outlets present the loss as a political rebuke, connecting it to Mace’s relationship with Trump and, in some coverage, her standing in MAGA politics. Center outlets mainly report her finish and the runoff, sometimes placing the result in broader primary coverage or in the context of Trump’s influence. Right-leaning outlets emphasize the significance of Trump’s endorsement and Mace’s failure to secure it.
- ARTICLES
- 19
- OUTLETS
- 18
- AVG CRED
- 67
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…













