2 Democrats Save Mike Johnson From Facing Another Floor Shutdown
The article centers on the votes that allowed Johnson to avoid another House floor shutdown.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Daily Caller is a partisan political outlet, but this article attributes statements to named lawmakers and identifies other reporting for a contextual claim. The text provides limited independent verification and does not include responses from Golden or Perez.
- Source type — A partisan political news outlet; its framing warrants some caution.
- Transparency — It attributes lawmakers' statements and identifies The Oregonian for one claim.
- Author attribution — The article names an author.
- Source diversity — Much of the account relies on lawmakers' statements and social media posts, with limited independent sourcing.
The article supplies procedural context, quotes lawmakers, and attributes claims, but it relies heavily on statements and social media posts. It does not include explanations from Golden or Perez for their votes, leaving an important perspective absent.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article reports both the Democrats' procedural votes and criticism from Democratic leaders, alongside Republican objections to the funding measure. It does not provide Golden's or Perez's reasoning for voting as they did, nor a response to Roy's claims about the continuing resolution.
- Counterarguments presented — Reports objections to the continuing resolution and Democratic leaders' criticism of the two Democrats.
- Source diversity — Includes statements from multiple lawmakers but not from Golden or Perez.
- Omitted context — Does not explain Golden's or Perez's reasons for supporting the rule.
- Loaded language — The headline's word 'rescued' adds a dramatic frame, while the body is comparatively factual.
The article uses a favorable frame for Johnson and highlights conservative objections to the funding package, while also reporting criticism of Golden and Perez from Democratic leaders. Its tone is mostly reportorial but its emphasis leans right.
- Headline — Frames the Democrats as saving Johnson from a shutdown of the House floor.
- Framing — Gives notable space to conservative objections to the continuing resolution.
- Source selection — Includes criticism from Democratic leaders but no explanation from Golden or Perez themselves.
- Language tone — Mostly reports actions and attributed statements without overtly inflammatory wording.
Democratic Reps. Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez voted for a House rule, allowing debate to proceed and sparing Speaker Mike Johnson a floor shutdown. Their votes drew criticism from Democratic leaders, while the continuing resolution averted a government shutdown by extending funding through December 11.
Democratic Reps. Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez voted for a rule to open debate on bills after five Republicans voted against it. The article says their votes allowed the House to proceed and spared Speaker Mike Johnson a floor shutdown. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said he had not received a heads-up, and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she was disappointed in their votes.
Community verdict
12 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Voted for the rule that allowed House debate to proceed
Perez's version of this story ↗Voted for the rule that allowed House debate to proceed
Golden's version of this story ↗One of five Republicans who voted against the rule
One of five Republicans who voted against the rule
President referenced in connection with Golden's and Perez's districts
Former President referenced in a comparison to Golden's voting record
One of five Republicans who voted against the rule
House Minority Leader who said he had not received advance notice of the votes
Former House Speaker who criticized the votes
Republican representative who voted against the rule and opposed the continuing resolution
One of five Republicans who voted against the rule
Republican representative described as a holdout who later accepted Johnson's plan
Senator who introduced an amendment to remove the delay of the hemp ban
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…













