Skip to main content
2 min read

Trump Took Revenge on MAGA Ally Lauren Boebert Over Epstein Vote, Thomas Massie Says

Massie said Trump retaliated against Boebert after she helped force a House vote on releasing the Epstein files.

Trump Took Revenge on MAGA Ally Lauren Boebert Over Epstein Vote, Thomas Massie Says
Image · The Daily Beast

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityThe Daily Beast71/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 7, 2026
tl;dr

Rep. Thomas Massie said President Donald Trump vetoed Colorado water legislation to retaliate against Rep. Lauren Boebert for supporting a push to release the Epstein files. Trump’s stated reason was that the project was too costly and inefficient.

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
Lauren Boebert R · CO-4
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting Boebert in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Boebert’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

SWIPE →

Colorado representative whose vote and support for the discharge petition are cited as the alleged reason for Trump's veto

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Thomas Massie
R · KY-4

Kentucky representative alleging that Trump vetoed Colorado water legislation in retaliation against Boebert

Massie's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President whose veto of Colorado water legislation is alleged to have been retaliation against Boebert

Trump's version of this story ↗

Part of a bigger story

5 OUTLETS
Massie Links Trump’s Water Bill Veto to Boebert’s Epstein Petition

Outlets report that Thomas Massie said President Donald Trump vetoed a Colorado water bill to retaliate against Lauren Boebert for supporting an effort to release Epstein-related files. Left-leaning outlets foreground Massie’s retaliation allegation. Center outlets also report the allegation, with Mediaite stressing it is unverified. Right-leaning outlets pair it with Trump’s stated cost rationale for the veto.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…